Document Detail

Comparison of a low-pressure and a high-pressure pulsatile lavage during débridement for orthopaedic implant infection.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21387137     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of high-pressure pulsatile lavage and low-pressure lavage in patients with an orthopaedic implant infection treated with open débridement followed by antibiotic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an orthopaedic implant infection requiring open débridement from January 2008 to August 2009 were randomized prospectively to a low-pressure or a high-pressure pulsatile lavage arm. Relevant information about demographics, co-morbidity, type of implant, microbiology data, surgical treatment, and outcome were recorded. Comparison of proportions was made using χ(2) test or Fisher exact test when necessary. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of treatment failure from open débridement to the last visit. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. There were no differences between the main characteristics between both groups (p > 0.05). Mean (SD) age of the whole cohort was 70.2 (11.9) years. There were 46 infections on knee prosthesis, 17 on hip prosthesis, 7 on hip hemiarthroplasties and 9 on osteosynthesis devices. There were 69 acute post-surgical infections, 8 acute haematogenous infections and 2 chronic infections. The most common microorganisms isolated were coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 34 cases, Staphylococcus aureus in 26 and Escherichia coli in 19 cases. There were 30 polymicrobial infections. A total of 42 and 37 patients were randomized to a high-pressure pulsatile or a low-pressure lavage, respectively. There was no difference in the success rate between both arms (80.9 vs. 86.5%, p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The use of a high-pressure pulsatile lavage during open débridement of implant infections had a similar success rate as a low-pressure lavage.
E Muñoz-Mahamud; S García; G Bori; J C Martínez-Pastor; J A Zumbado; J Riba; J Mensa; A Soriano
Related Documents :
11831427 - Effect of polarized light in the healing process of pressure ulcers.
17137287 - The current procedural terminology and the medicare resource based relative value scale...
9227937 - Pressure ulcer prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and impact.
7966467 - Prospective evaluation of craniofacial pressure in four different cervical orthoses.
20540447 - Pressure regulating ear plug testing in a pressure chamber.
17939557 - The effect of hydration status on the echocardiographic measurements of normal cats.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-3-9
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1434-3916     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-3-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9011043     Medline TA:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Correction of crossover deformity of second toe by combined plantar plate tenodesis and extensor dig...
Next Document:  Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric...