Document Detail


Comparison of likelihood ratios of first-trimester nuchal translucency measurements: multiples of median, delta or mixture.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20503228     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the likelihood ratios (LR) determined for a measured nuchal translucency (NT) using the multiples of the median (MoM), delta-NT and mixture model approaches.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with known outcome screened at the 12(th) week of pregnancy between January 2006 and May 2008. NT, crown-rump length (CRL) and LR for trisomy 21 using the delta-NT approach (LRNT-delta) were extracted from The Fetal Medicine Foundation trisomy 21 risk-calculation software database. NT measurements were converted into their equivalent MoM by dividing by the expected CRL-specific median NT. LR for trisomy 21 based on the MoM (LRNT-MoM) of each case was then calculated as the ratio of the Gaussian probability density functions using published trisomy 21 risk-screening parameters. The LR using the mixture model (LRNT-mixture) was calculated as the ratio of individual composite probability densities reported for trisomy 21 and unaffected pregnancies. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement between the three different approaches while the paired t-test was used to perform pairwise comparisons.
RESULTS: Of the 5907 pregnancies with known outcome, 14 had trisomy 21. The ICC between the three approaches to determining an LR was 0.947 (95% CI, 0.943-0.951; P < 0.0001). Pairwise comparison indicated that differences between LR were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Likelihood ratios determined via the delta-NT model were in general greater than those produced by both the mixture model (z = 5.58, P < 0.0001) and the MoM approaches (z = 32.8, P < 0.0001). For a 5% false-positive rate the detection rate of trisomy 21 (DR) was 78.6% (95% CI, 57.1-99.9%) The screen positive thresholds to achieve this DR were 1 : 200 for the delta-NT approach, 1 : 220 for the mixture approach and 1 : 290 for the MoM approach.
CONCLUSION: No single method of determining NT-associated LR outperformed the others in its ability to detect a trisomy 21-affected pregnancy.
Authors:
D S Sahota; T Y Leung; M Chen; L W Chan; T Y Fung; T K Lau
Related Documents :
8311928 - Detection of fetal trisomies 21 and 18 from maternal blood using triple gradient and ma...
15932828 - First-trimester ductus venosus, nasal bones, and down syndrome in a high-risk population.
15672008 - Nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac defects: a pooled analysis of major fetal echocar...
14966338 - The distribution of fetal nuchal translucency thickness in normal korean fetuses.
581338 - Placental coccidioidomycosis without fetal disease.
12077548 - Multiple hpv-positive basal cell carcinomas on the abdomen in a young pregnant woman.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1469-0705     ISO Abbreviation:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Publication Date:  2010 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-01     Completed Date:  2010-12-17     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9108340     Medline TA:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  15-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China. daljit@cuhk.edu.hk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Crown-Rump Length
Down Syndrome / ultrasonography*
Female
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Nuchal Translucency Measurement / methods*
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Probability
Retrospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Reproducibility and repeatability of maternal venous Doppler flow measurements in renal interlobar a...
Next Document:  Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence.