Document Detail


Comparison of hospital risk-standardized mortality rates calculated by using in-hospital and 30-day models: an observational study with implications for hospital profiling.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22213491     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: In-hospital mortality measures, which are widely used to assess hospital quality, are not based on a standardized follow-up period and may systematically favor hospitals with shorter lengths of stay (LOSs).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between performance measures of U.S. hospitals by using risk-standardized in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: Nonfederal acute care hospitals in the United States with at least 30 admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia from 2004 to 2006.
PATIENTS: Medicare fee-for-service patients admitted for AMI, HF, or pneumonia from 2004 to 2006.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs).
RESULTS: Included patients comprised 718,508 admissions to 3135 hospitals for AMI, 1,315,845 admissions to 4209 hospitals for HF, and 1,415,237 admissions to 4498 hospitals for pneumonia. The hospital-level mean patient LOS varied across hospitals for each condition, ranging from 2.3 to 13.7 days for AMI, 3.5 to 11.9 days for HF, and 3.8 to 14.8 days for pneumonia. The mean RSMR differences (30-day RSMR minus in-hospital RSMR) were 5.3% (SD, 1.3) for AMI, 6.0% (SD, 1.3) for HF, and 5.7% (SD, 1.4) for pneumonia; distributions varied widely across hospitals. Performance classifications differed between the in-hospital and 30-day models for 257 hospitals (8.2%) for AMI, 456 (10.8%) for HF, and 662 (14.7%) for pneumonia. Hospital mean LOS was positively correlated with in-hospital RSMRs for all 3 conditions.
LIMITATION: Medicare claims data were used for risk adjustment.
CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality measures provide a different assessment of hospital performance than 30-day mortality and are biased in favor of hospitals with shorter LOSs.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Authors:
Elizabeth E Drye; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Joseph S Ross; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Lein Han; Michael Rapp; Harlan M Krumholz
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of internal medicine     Volume:  156     ISSN:  1539-3704     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Intern. Med.     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-01-03     Completed Date:  2012-02-13     Revised Date:  2013-02-20    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372351     Medline TA:  Ann Intern Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  19-26     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA. Elizabeth.Drye@yale.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Heart Failure / mortality
Hospital Mortality*
Hospitals / standards*
Humans
Length of Stay
Medicare
Myocardial Infarction / mortality
Patient Transfer / statistics & numerical data
Pneumonia / mortality
Quality of Health Care*
United States
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
K08 AG032886-04/AG/NIA NIH HHS; U01-HL105270-02/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):404

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparison of natural language processing biosurveillance methods for identifying influenza from enc...
Next Document:  Evaluation of guideline recommendations on oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systemat...