Document Detail


Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11832704     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: We evaluated the accuracy of noncontrast spiral computerized tomography (CT) for determining urinary stone size compared with plain x-ray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed noncontrast helical CT and plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder images of 39 patients with urolithiasis who underwent each study from July 1997 to February 1999. Stone size on x-ray was measured in the craniocaudal and transverse dimensions by a single radiologist (I.C.B.). The size of the same stone was then determined on blinded noncontrast spiral CT images. Stones that were less than 3 mm. were excluded from study. On CT estimated craniocaudal dimension was based on collimation thickness, the reconstruction interval and the number of images on which the stone was visualized. RESULTS: We evaluated 58 stones 3 mm. or larger in the greatest dimension on plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, and noncontrast spiral CT, including 15 in the distal ureter, 7 in the mid or proximal ureter and 36 in the kidneys. Stone size was 3 to 18 mm. in the greatest dimension. Mean transverse dimension of the stone plus or minus standard deviation on noncontrast spiral CT was 5.1 +/- 1.08 versus 4.9 +/- 1.08 mm. on plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (paired t test; p = 0.335). The mean craniocaudal dimension on noncontrast spiral CT was 7.5 +/- 1.98 versus 6.7 +/- 1.98 mm. on plain x-ray paired t test (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Noncontrast spiral CT enables a similar measurement of stone size along the transverse dimension as plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder. In individuals noncontrast spiral CT does not accurately measure the craniocaudal dimension of stones compared with plain x-ray when standard acquisition and reconstruction techniques are used. In this regard it has a tendency to overestimate stone size by an average of 0.8 mm.
Authors:
Narendra Narepalem; Chandru P Sundaram; Illya C Boridy; Yan Yan; Jay P Heiken; Ralph V Clayman
Related Documents :
9524594 - Helical versus conventional ct in detecting meniscal injuries.
9057524 - Helical ct angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.
16929014 - The role of late-phase pulse inversion harmonic imaging in the detection of occult hepa...
6389254 - Appearance of gas-containing gallstones on sonography and computed tomography.
9107644 - Intrahepatic metastatic nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma detected at lipiodol-ct: im...
19657644 - Nontumorous arterioportal shunts in the liver: ct and mri findings considering mechanis...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  167     ISSN:  0022-5347     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2002 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-02-08     Completed Date:  2002-02-28     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1235-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, Mallinkrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Humans
Kidney Calculi / radiography
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
Ureteral Calculi / radiography
Urinary Bladder Calculi / radiography
Urinary Calculi / radiography*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.
Next Document:  Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a stat...