Document Detail

Comparison of heart rate reserve versus 85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate as a measure of chronotropic response in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16490449     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The role of heart rate (HR) reserve (HRR) in the risk stratification of patients who undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography is not well defined. This study evaluated 1,323 patients (mean age 63 +/- 13 years, 47% men) who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Abnormal stress echocardiographic results were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia. HRR was defined as [(peak HR - HR at rest)/(220 - age - HR at rest)] x 100, with HRR <70% defined as low. Follow-up data (2.7 +/- 1.1 years) for confirmed myocardial infarction (n = 16) and cardiac death (n = 58) were obtained. HRR risk stratified patients into normal and abnormal subgroups (event rate 1.1%/year vs 4.2%/year, p <0.0001) and further risk stratified patients into normal (adjusted HR 1 [reference] vs 2.88, p = 0.04) and abnormal (adjusted HR 4.17 vs 10.09, p <0.0001) stress echocardiography groups. Low HRR (relative risk [RR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 4.01, p = 0.013) was an independent predictor of cardiac event even after controlling for standard cardiovascular risk factors, other stress electrocardiographic variables, and stress echocardiographic variables. Low HRR (chi-square 32) was superior to 85% maximum predicted HR (MPHR; chi-square 18) and provided incremental value over stress echocardiography and 85% MPHR (global chi-square increased from 48.3 to 54 to 61.3, p <0.0001) in a model consisting of stress echocardiography, MPHR, and HRR. In conclusion, HRR can further risk stratify patients who undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography and provides independent and incremental prognostic value over standard cardiovascular risk factors and also independent of echocardiographic myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction and is superior to 85% MPHR. In the setting of low HRR, normal stress echocardiographic results are prognostically less benign, whereas abnormal stress echocardiographic results are prognostically more malignant.
Sripal Bangalore; Siu-Sun Yao; Farooq A Chaudhry
Related Documents :
15679889 - Relevance of tissue doppler in the quantification of stress echocardiography for the de...
10590829 - Intrusive memories, post-traumatic stress disorder and myocardial infarction.
9183619 - Detection of myocardial viability using stress echocardiography.
12123319 - Adenosine myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographic stress testi...
3720779 - The role of psychologic stress in the genesis of lethal arrhythmias in patients with co...
9359049 - Ultra-early risk stratification after myocardial infarction via pharmacological stress ...
7419379 - Isolated circumflex coronary artery obstruction.
1427939 - Asymptomatic coronary heart disease detected on epidemiological survey of urban populat...
3204419 - Preventing heart disease: is treating the high risk sufficient?
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2006-01-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of cardiology     Volume:  97     ISSN:  0002-9149     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2006 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-02-21     Completed Date:  2006-04-18     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0207277     Medline TA:  Am J Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  742-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / therapeutic use
Age Factors
Analysis of Variance
Echocardiography, Stress*
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Rate* / drug effects
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia / physiopathology,  ultrasonography
Predictive Value of Tests
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume / drug effects
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Paradoxical contributions of non-compacted and compacted segments to global left ventricular dysfunc...
Next Document:  Effects of statins on renal function.