Document Detail

Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20645948     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
In a randomised, non-crossover study, we tested the hypothesis that the ease of insertion using a duodenal tube guided insertion technique and the oropharyngeal leak pressure differ between the LMA ProSeal and the i-gel in non-paralysed, anesthetised female subjects. One hundred and fifty-two females aged 19-70 years were studied. Insertion success rate, insertion time and oropharyngeal leak pressure were measured. First attempt and overall insertion success were similar (LMA ProSeal, 75/76 (99%) and 76/76 (100%); i-gel 73/75 (97%) and 75 (100%), respectively). Mean (SD) insertion times were similar (LMA ProSeal, 40 (16) s; i-gel 43 (21) s). Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was 7 cmH(2) O higher with the LMA ProSeal (p < 0.0001). Insertion of the LMA ProSeal and i-gel is similarly easy using a duodenal tube guided technique, but the LMA ProSeal forms a more effective seal for ventilation.
L Gasteiger; J Brimacombe; D Perkhofer; M Kaufmann; C Keller
Related Documents :
9596128 - Nasal airflow resistance measurement: forced oscillation technique versus posterior rhi...
7419718 - How does heo2 increase maximum expiratory flow in human lungs?
18652688 - Reliability of home cpap titration with different automatic cpap devices.
123128 - Continuous positive airway pressure breathing (cpap). apparatus for use in neonates or ...
11675958 - Clinical trial of arotinolol in the treatment of hypertension: dippers vs. non-dippers.
965298 - Uterine work in parturition.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Anaesthesia     Volume:  65     ISSN:  1365-2044     ISO Abbreviation:  Anaesthesia     Publication Date:  2010 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-04     Completed Date:  2011-01-24     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370524     Medline TA:  Anaesthesia     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  913-6     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Air Pressure
Disposable Equipment
Equipment Design
Intubation, Intratracheal / instrumentation,  methods
Laryngeal Masks*
Middle Aged
Oropharynx / physiology
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Risk of intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injections.
Next Document:  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral vein in anaesthetised infants and young children.