Document Detail


Comparison of food consumption frequencies among NHANES and CPES children: implications for dietary pesticide exposure and risk assessment.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19738638     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Characterizing food consumption patterns among children is critical to dietary pesticide exposure assessment. We have used public release data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the longitudinal Children's Pesticide Exposure Study (CPES) to illustrate the magnitude of potential error introduced by using national-scale, cross-sectional data to estimate the consumption frequencies for smaller cohorts. We focused on foods commonly consumed by children in the target CPES age and income group (3-11 years; annual household income >$75,000) and foods likely to contain organophosphorus or pyrethroid pesticide residues. We defined "percent eaters" as the percentage of study participants who reported eating a particular food in a 24-h period. We computed the weighted percent eaters and 95% confidence limits (CL) for the target age/income group using the NHANES 24-h dietary recall data and compared these with the CPES percent eaters by sampling day and season. For certain foods, particularly the seasonally available produce (for example, apples, peaches/nectarines, melon, grapes, pears, strawberries), soy milk, and peanut butter, the CPES percent eaters fell outside the NHANES 95% CLs on many sampling days. For other foods (for example, orange juice and cow's milk), differences were not readily apparent. Although the differences we observed for certain foods may be, in part, because of measurement error, they also likely reflect seasonal and geographic patterns among the CPES data that the public release NHANES data do not capture. Using NHANES data to estimate pesticide intakes from strawberries, for example, may underestimate the exposure of the CPES children, as significantly more CPES than NHANES children ate strawberries on many sampling days. For other sampling days or other foods, overestimation is also possible.
Authors:
Anne M Riederer; Melanie A Pearson; Chensheng Lu
Related Documents :
99818 - Productivity of ospreys in connecticut--long island increases as dde residues decline.
15300138 - Patterns of pesticide use and their determinants among wives of farmer pesticide applic...
6546568 - Pesticide, metal, and other chemical residues in adult total diet samples. (xiv). octob...
9776788 - Technical hexachlorocyclohexane use trends in china and their impact on the environment.
1689328 - A risk-reduction nutrition course for adults.
1005578 - "dieters" and "vomiters and purgers" in anorexia nervosa.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.     Date:  2009-09-09
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology     Volume:  20     ISSN:  1559-064X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol     Publication Date:  2010 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-20     Completed Date:  2010-12-17     Revised Date:  2014-04-08    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101262796     Medline TA:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  602-14     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet* / adverse effects,  statistics & numerical data
Eating*
Environmental Exposure* / adverse effects
Food / adverse effects,  statistics & numerical data
Fruit / adverse effects
Humans
Nutrition Surveys / methods*
Pesticides / adverse effects*
Research Design
Risk Assessment
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Pesticides

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Ohtahara syndrome in a family with an ARX protein truncation mutation (c.81C>G/p.Y27X).
Next Document:  The eosinophil: "is it still the king"?