Document Detail

Comparison of environment and mice in static and mechanically ventilated isolator cages with different air velocities and ventilation designs.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14984284     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The purpose of this study was to compare environmental conditions and mice in cages with four different mechanical ventilation designs and a static isolator cage. Environmental conditions (air velocity, temperature, relative humidity, bedding weight change, airborne dust, NH3, and CO2) were compared for each cage type (n = 5 per cage). Bedding type was chipped hardwood. Mouse response in each cage type was evaluated by body weight, feed consumption, water intake, location of specific behaviors, and building of bedding mounds. Commercial polycarbonate mouse caging units (29.2 x 19.1 x 12.7 cm shoebox style, stainless-steel round wire bar lids, and 7-cm-deep isolator cage filter tops) were modified to fit the mechanical ventilation cage types and were used for the static isolator cages. Mechanically ventilated cages were fitted with forced air inlets centered 5 cm above the cage floor on the 19.1 cm-side of the cage. Inlet air velocity was either 40 or 200 feet/min (n = 10 cages each), and the air volume exchange rate was 9.3 L/min. In half of the mechanically ventilated cages, the exhaust air was forced through a filter in the isolator cage top, whereas in the remaining mechanically ventilated cages, the air was forced through a single exhaust port fixed in the narrow side of the cage top directly above the air inlet. Inlet air velocity but not exhaust design affected intracage air velocity distribution. Other environmental conditions were similar between the four mechanical ventilation designs. Relative to the mechanically ventilated cages, the static isolator cages had lower air velocities, higher relative humidities, higher NH3 levels, higher CO2 levels, lower body weight gain, and lower water consumption; temperatures, particulate levels, and feed consumption rates did not differ significantly between cage types. Locations of bedding mounds and behaviors were similar in all cage treatments.
Farhad Memarzadeh; Paul C Harrison; Gerald L Riskowski; Tonja Henze
Related Documents :
15091434 - Response of a grassland ecosystem to air pollutants. iv. the chemical climate: concentr...
22906314 - Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the canter...
11539534 - Inhalation risk in low-gravity spacecraft.
16442294 - Retrospective estimation of the concentration of 241pu in air sampled at a belgrade sit...
12480304 - Toxicity of the chlordane metabolite oxychlordane in female rats: clinical and histopat...
16236214 - The new nutrition science: sustainability and development.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science / American Association for Laboratory Animal Science     Volume:  43     ISSN:  1060-0558     ISO Abbreviation:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci     Publication Date:  2004 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-02-26     Completed Date:  2004-03-16     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9204153     Medline TA:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  14-20     Citation Subset:  IM    
Division of Policy and Program Assessment, Office of Research Facilities, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Air / analysis
Animal Husbandry*
Animals, Laboratory*
Body Weight
Housing, Animal*
Nesting Behavior
Comment In:
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2004 Jan;43(1):7   [PMID:  14989290 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Effects of Freund's complete adjuvant on the physiology, histology, and activity of New Zealand Whit...
Next Document:  Comparison of fertility between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization with a p...