Document Detail


Comparison of enprostil and cimetidine in active duodenal ulcer disease. Summary of pooled European studies.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  3092659     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Data were combined for statistical analysis from four European trials comparing enprostil (35 micrograms twice daily) with cimetidine (400 mg twice daily) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, using a double-blind, randomized design with endoscopic control. A total of 369 patients entered the trials, of whom 348 were eligible for the efficacy analyses and 362 for the safety analyses. Patients were allowed antacids as needed. The pooled cumulative healing rates at two, four, and six weeks were 40, 75, and 84 percent, respectively, for enprostil and 42, 77, and 87 percent, respectively, for cimetidine. There were no significant differences between treatments. Healing rates in both groups were reduced in smokers, in those with larger ulcers at baseline, and in those who reported a higher consumption of alcohol. Age, however, had no effect on healing rates. Digestive system complaints were reported more frequently in the enprostil group, whereas central nervous system complaints were more than twice as frequent in the cimetidine group.
Authors:
L Winters
Related Documents :
2877569 - Treatment of active duodenal ulcers with famotidine. a double-blind comparison with ran...
3513329 - Effectiveness of foaming antacid in relieving induced heartburn.
6356319 - Short-term treatment with sucralfate or cimetidine in gastric ulcer: preliminary result...
22742999 - Accelerometer as a tool to assess sedentarity and adherence to physical activity recomm...
6340009 - A comparison of oxmetidine and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
3061859 - Famotidine versus cimetidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. double-blind, ra...
13678869 - Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricu...
22609319 - Improving the prediction of stroke or death after transient ischemic attack (tia) by ad...
7084649 - A randomized double-blind study of nalbuphine as an analgesic for colonoscopy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of medicine     Volume:  81     ISSN:  0002-9343     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Med.     Publication Date:  1986 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1986-10-06     Completed Date:  1986-10-06     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0267200     Medline TA:  Am J Med     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  69-74     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Alcohol Drinking
Belgium
Cimetidine / administration & dosage,  adverse effects,  therapeutic use*
Clinical Trials as Topic
Double-Blind Method
Duodenal Ulcer / drug therapy*
Enprostil
Female
France
Great Britain
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prostaglandins E, Synthetic / administration & dosage,  adverse effects,  therapeutic use*
Random Allocation
Smoking
Sweden
Time Factors
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Prostaglandins E, Synthetic; 51481-61-9/Cimetidine; 73121-56-9/Enprostil

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Treatment of duodenal ulcer with enprostil, a prostaglandin E2 analogue.
Next Document:  Treatment of gastric ulcer with enprostil.