Document Detail


Comparison of effects of lidocaine hydrochloride, buffered lidocaine, diphenhydramine, and normal saline after intradermal injection.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12208437     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain and the spread of analgesia when local anesthetics are given as an intradermal injection into the dorsal aspect of the hand. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 40 consenting adult volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a 0.25-mL injection of either lidocaine hydrochloride (1%), buffered lidocaine, diphenhydramine (1%), or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) into the dorsal aspect of both hands. MEASUREMENTS: The volunteers used a visual analog scale to compare the pain of needle insertion and solution injection. Then at 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after intradermal injection, the extent of the analgesic area was marked on a strip of tape placed horizontally across the hand. Then at 32 minutes after intradermal injection, the extent of the analgesic area was marked on a strip of tape placed vertically across the hand. The volunteers were called each day and asked the duration of their numbness or hyperesthesia until their hands were no longer numb or sore. MAIN RESULTS: Buffered lidocaine during intradermal infiltration was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) less painful than either lidocaine hydrochloride or diphenhydramine and equivalent to placebo. Diphenhydramine and lidocaine hydrochloride during intradermal infiltration induced significantly (p < 0.05) more pain than buffered lidocaine or placebo. Lidocaine hydrochloride displayed a significantly (p < 0.05) larger diameter of analgesia than placebo by 1 minute after the injection, buffered lidocaine by 2 minutes after injection, and diphenhydramine by 5 minutes after injection. By 20 minutes after injection, diphenhydramine diameter of analgesia was significantly (p < 0.05) larger than placebo but significantly less than buffered lidocaine. By 30 minutes after injection, diphenhydramine diameter of analgesia was equivalent to placebo whereas buffered lidocaine and lidocaine diameters were still significantly (p < 0.05) larger than placebo. Diphenhydramine injection resulted in numbness that lasted significantly (p < 0.05) longer than other study solutions whereas buffered lidocaine and lidocaine injections resulted in numbness that lasted significantly longer than placebo. Diphenhydramine injection resulted in hyperesthesia that lasted for 2 or more days in 12 of the volunteers. CONCLUSION: There is a reduction of infiltration pain using buffered lidocaine as opposed to lidocaine and diphenhydramine. Although lidocaine injection resulted in a slightly faster spread of analgesic diameter, buffered lidocaine was equivalent to lidocaine from minute 2 until minute 30. Therefore, to obtain optimal anesthetic conditions, we recommend that buffered lidocaine be given 2 minutes before performing catheterization, whereas diphenhydramine should be given 5 minutes before catheterization, but only when buffered lidocaine cannot be used.
Authors:
Yun Xia; Edward Chen; David L Tibbits; Thomas E Reilley; Thomas D McSweeney
Related Documents :
8311307 - Anesthetic depth defined using multiple noxious stimuli during isoflurane/oxygen anesth...
24806687 - Mitochondria modify exercise-induced development of stem cell-derived neurons in the ad...
9187787 - Difficult intubation and brain-stem anaesthesia.
24090487 - The expression of excessive exercise co-segregates with the risk of developing an eatin...
7849747 - A randomized-control study of active and passive treatments for chronic low back pain f...
8056467 - Blood lactate after maximal and supramaximal exercise in 10- to 12-year-old bolivian bo...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical anesthesia     Volume:  14     ISSN:  0952-8180     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Anesth     Publication Date:  2002 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-09-04     Completed Date:  2002-12-19     Revised Date:  2010-10-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8812166     Medline TA:  J Clin Anesth     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  339-43     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage*
Diphenhydramine / administration & dosage*
Double-Blind Method
Female
Hand / physiopathology
Humans
Hypesthesia / etiology
Injections, Intradermal
Lidocaine / administration & dosage*
Male
Pain / chemically induced*,  drug therapy*,  physiopathology
Pain Measurement
Sodium Chloride / administration & dosage*
Time Factors
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Local; 137-58-6/Lidocaine; 58-73-1/Diphenhydramine; 7647-14-5/Sodium Chloride

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Head and neck elevation beyond the sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult d...
Next Document:  Effects of combining midazolam and barbiturate on the response to tracheal intubation: changes in au...