Document Detail


Comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a cardiology hospital.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17395672     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: A few recent studies have evaluated diagnostic accuracy by comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a hospital specialising in cardiology. METHODS: 406 consecutive autopsy cases during 2 years were studied. Patients were aged 47.4+/-28.4 years; 236 (58.1%) were men and 170 (41.9%) women. Diagnostic comparison was categorised in classes I to V (I, II, III and IV: discrepancy in decreasing order of importance regarding therapy and prognosis; V: concordance). Categorisation was ranked on the basis of the highest degree of discrepancy. Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi(2) test and stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Each age increase of 10 years added 16.2% to the risk of the diagnostic comparison to be categorised in classes I and II (major discrepancy) in comparison to classes III, IV and V (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27, p<0.001). By contrast, admission to intensive care units decreased the risk of categorisation in classes I and II by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85, p = 0.009). The most frequent diagnostic discrepancy occurred for pulmonary embolism: 30 out of 88 (34.1%) diagnoses in classes I and II. The concordance rate was 71.1% for acute myocardial infarction, 75% for aorta dissection, 73.1% for infective endocarditis and 35.2% for pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Age and hospital ward influenced the distribution of diagnostic discrepancy or concordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. The lower discrepancy rate for myocardial infarction and infective endocarditis may be related to the fact that the study was carried out in a specialist hospital.
Authors:
Rafael Saad; Alice Tatsuko Yamada; Fernando Henrique Ferraz Pereira da Rosa; Paulo Sampaio Gutierrez; Alfredo José Mansur
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2007-03-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Heart (British Cardiac Society)     Volume:  93     ISSN:  1468-201X     ISO Abbreviation:  Heart     Publication Date:  2007 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-10-15     Completed Date:  2007-11-26     Revised Date:  2010-11-02    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9602087     Medline TA:  Heart     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1414-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Autopsy / standards*
Brazil
Cardiac Care Facilities / standards*
Child
Child, Preschool
Emergency Service, Hospital
Endocarditis / diagnosis,  pathology
Female
Heart Diseases / diagnosis*,  pathology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units
International Classification of Diseases
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis,  pathology
Patients' Rooms
Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis,  pathology
Reproducibility of Results

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Coronary microvascular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: increased coronary zero flow pressur...
Next Document:  Impact of arterial remodelling and plaque rupture on target and non-target lesion revascularisation ...