Document Detail


Comparison between Transthoracic Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Status Post Atrial Switch Procedure.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22011133     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Objectives.  This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries. Background.  This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Methods.  Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared. Results.  For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P= .002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P= .002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P= .063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P= .002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P= .250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions.  In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.
Authors:
Jason G Ho; Mervyn D Cohen; Eric S Ebenroth; Marcus S Schamberger; Timothy M Cordes; Matthew T Bramlet; Roger A Hurwitz; Tiffanie R Johnson
Related Documents :
9059303 - Pulmonary involvement in adult gaucher's disease: high resolution ct appearance.
1643313 - Diagnostic pulmonary imaging.
16165303 - A three-dimensional digital atlas database of the adult c57bl/6j mouse brain by magneti...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-10-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Congenital heart disease     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1747-0803     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-10-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101256510     Medline TA:  Congenit Heart Dis     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
© 2011 Copyright the Authors. Congenital Heart Disease © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Affiliation:
Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Departments of Pediatrics Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Thai Human Papillomavirus Beliefs Scale.
Next Document:  Moving forward on women's gender-related HIV vulnerability: The good news, the bad news and what to ...