Document Detail

Comparison between 0.08% ropivacaine and 0.06% levobupivacaine for epidural analgesia during nulliparous labor: a retrospective study in a single center.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21733358     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are new local anesthetics that have effects similar to bupivacaine. However, the relative potency of these two drugs is controversial. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether a combination of 0.06% levobupivacaine and 0.0002% fentanyl had the same effects as 0.08% ropivacaine and 0.0002% fentanyl on the mode of delivery and other obstetric outcomes when used for epidural analgesia of labor in nulliparous women.
METHODS: Computer records of 392 Asian nulliparous parturients, who had presented with spontaneous labor or spontaneous rupture of the membranes, and had received epidural analgesia were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 193 received 0.08% ropivacaine and 199 received 0.06% levobupivacaine. Fentanyl (0.0002%) was used in both regimens.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the mode of delivery, duration of labor, or neonatal outcome between the two groups. In the levobupivacaine group, the parturients required top-up boluses of local anesthetics more frequently (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 0.9 ± 1.3, p< 0.0001), and the incidence of temporary maternal fever (25 % vs. 15%, p = 0.024) and the cost of local anesthetic were higher (292 ± 183 NTD vs. 146 ± 104 NTD, p< 0.0001). However, the amount of local anesthetic administered during labor was lower (79 ± 49 mg vs. 114 ± 81 mg, p< 0.0001) than for the ropivacaine group.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.06 % levobupivacaine was as effective as 0.08% ropivacaine, when both were used with 0.0002% fentanyl for labor epidural analgesia of nulliparous women.
Hui-Ling Lee; Liang-Ming Lo; Chung-Chuan Chou; Eng-Chye Chuah
Related Documents :
22808838 - Results of aortic valve replacement with the supra-annular sorin bicarbon overline pros...
23091408 - Gross total resection of glioma with the intraoperative fluorescence-guidance of fluore...
21733358 - Comparison between 0.08% ropivacaine and 0.06% levobupivacaine for epidural analgesia d...
24509458 - A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-g...
24699608 - M. trizzino, l. carnevali, s. de felici & paolo audisio (2013) a revision of hydraena s...
24292108 - Nonuremic calciphylaxis precipitated by teriparatide [rhpth(1-34)] therapy in the setti...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Chang Gung medical journal     Volume:  34     ISSN:  2309-835X     ISO Abbreviation:  Chang Gung Med J     Publication Date:    2011 May-Jun
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-07-07     Completed Date:  2011-11-04     Revised Date:  2013-10-22    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101088034     Medline TA:  Chang Gung Med J     Country:  China (Republic : 1949- )    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  286-92     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Songshan District, Taipei, Taiwan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Amides / administration & dosage*
Analgesia, Epidural*
Analgesia, Obstetrical*
Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage*
Bupivacaine / administration & dosage,  analogs & derivatives
Retrospective Studies
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Amides; 0/Anesthetics, Local; 2180-92-9/Bupivacaine; 7IO5LYA57N/ropivacaine; A5H73K9U3W/levobupivacaine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The levels of stress and depression among interns and clerks in three medical centers in Taiwan--a c...
Next Document:  An anatomical study of the inferior oblique muscle with emphasis on its nerve entry.