Document Detail

Comparison of automated 4D-MSPECT and visual analysis for evaluating myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19073376     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease (CAD) of an automated software package, 4D-MSPECT, and compare the results with a visual approach. We enrolled 60 patients without previously known CAD, who underwent dual-isotope rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging and subsequent coronary angiography within 3 months. The automated summed stress score (A-SSS), summed rest score (A-SRS) and summed difference score (A-SDS) were obtained using a 17-segment five-point scale model with 4D-MSPECT. For intraobserver and interobserver variability assessment, automated scoring was done by a nuclear medicine physician twice and by a nuclear medicine technologist. The visual summed stress score (V-SSS), summed rest score (V-SRS), and summed difference score (V-SDS) were obtained by consensus of two nuclear medicine physicians. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements of automated segmental scores were excellent. The intraobserver and interobserver summed scores also correlated well. Agreements between visual and automated segmental scores were moderate (weighted kappa of 0.55 and 0.50 for stress and rest images, respectively). Correlations between automated and visual summed scores were high, with correlation coefficients of 0.89, 0.85 and 0.82 for SSS, SRS and SDS, respectively (all p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for diagnosis of CAD by V-SSS, V-SDS, A-SSS and A-SDS were 0.78 +/- 0.06, 0.87 +/- 0.05, 0.84 +/- 0.05 and 0.90 +/- 0.04, respectively. A-SDS had better diagnostic performance than A-SSS and V-SSS (p = 0.043 and p = 0.032, respectively), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between A-SDS and V-SDS (p = 0.56). Using V-SDS > or = 2 as a diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CAD were 83.7%, 76.5% and 81.7%, respectively. Using A-SDS > or = 3 as a diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CAD were 79.1%, 82.4% and 80.0%, respectively. In conclusion, the reproducibility of automated semiquantitative analysis with 4D-MSPECT was excellent. The diagnostic performance of automated semiquantitative analysis with 4D-MSPECT was comparable with the visual approach.
Chien-Chin Hsu; Yu-Wen Chen; Chi-Long Hao; Jun-Ted Chong; Chun-I Lee; Hau-Tong Tan; Ming-Sheng Wu; Jung-Chou Wu
Related Documents :
25384966 - Soluble p‑selectin promotes acute myocardial infarction onset but not severity.
10531146 - Coronary artery disease in potential lung transplant recipients > 50 years old: the rol...
18344556 - Xenon or propofol anaesthesia for patients at cardiovascular risk in non-cardiac surgery.
3956526 - Detection of right-coronary-artery disease using stress thallium scintigraphy: importan...
2869616 - Oxprenolol in myocardial infarction survivors: brief review of the european infarction ...
3718796 - Quantitative analysis of myocardial fibrosis in normals, hypertensive hearts, and hyper...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1607-551X     ISO Abbreviation:  Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci.     Publication Date:  2008 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-16     Completed Date:  2009-03-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100960562     Medline TA:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci     Country:  China (Republic : 1949- )    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  445-52     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pingtung Christian Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Coronary Artery Disease / radionuclide imaging*
Coronary Circulation*
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / methods*,  standards*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Fundamental aspects of the impact of glucocorticoids on the (immature) brain.
Next Document:  Health-related quality of life in Taiwanese dialysis patients: effects of dialysis modality.