Document Detail


Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19101495     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) for buccal infiltration in patients experiencing irreversible pulpitis in maxillary posterior teeth. STUDY DESIGN: Forty patients with irreversible pulpitis in first premolar or first molar were divided into 4 study groups and received buccal infiltration of either 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine in a double-blind manner. Endodontic access was begun 5 minutes after solution deposition. Success was defined as no or mild discomfort (VAS recordings) during the endodontic procedure. RESULTS: The success rate for maxillary buccal infiltration to produce pulpal anesthesia using articaine was 100% in first premolar and first molar, and for the lidocaine solution, success rate was 80% in first premolar and 30% in first molar. There was high significant difference between the articaine and lidocaine solutions (ANOVA; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of 4% articaine was superior to 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in posterior teeth.
Authors:
Narasimhan Srinivasan; Mahendran Kavitha; Chandarasekaran S Loganathan; Govindasamy Padmini
Related Documents :
2324985 - Cardiovascular and ventilatory responses to dynamic exercise during epidural anaesthesi...
23526925 - Increased expression of neurotrophin 4 following focal cerebral ischemia in adult rat b...
24149535 - Differences in ball sports athletes speed discrimination skills before and after exerci...
15242435 - Efficacy of the a-line aep monitor as a tool for predicting successful insertion of a l...
2227535 - Age migraine and achievement motivation related? a psychophysiological study of respons...
1279565 - A comparison of external rate responsive pacemakers with identical implanted units.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics     Volume:  107     ISSN:  1528-395X     ISO Abbreviation:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod     Publication Date:  2009 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-22     Completed Date:  2009-02-24     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9508562     Medline TA:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  133-6     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Tamilnadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai-3, India. nbalaji_82@yahoo.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesia, Dental / methods*
Anesthesia, Local / methods*
Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage*
Bicuspid
Carticaine / administration & dosage*
Cheek
Double-Blind Method
Humans
Lidocaine / administration & dosage*
Maxilla
Molar
Pain Measurement
Prospective Studies
Pulpitis / therapy*
Root Canal Therapy*
Young Adult
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Local; 137-58-6/Lidocaine; 23964-58-1/Carticaine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection...
Next Document:  An immunohistochemical evaluation of cell adhesion molecules in human dental pulp after tooth prepar...