Document Detail


Comparison of advanced visual field defects measured with the T?bingen Mobile Campimeter and the Octopus 101 perimeter.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19882509     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To compare the results of advanced visual field defects (VFD) measured with the conventional reference perimeter Octopus 101 (O-101) and the new portable T?bingen Mobile Campimeter (TMC). METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects (18 to 75 years), 13 with advanced arcuate scotomas, 12 with VFD respecting vertical meridians, 6 with concentric constriction and 6 healthy controls were included. First examination was with O-101: grid 30 degrees -NO, 192 stimuli, 10 cd/m(2) background luminance, stimulus size: Goldmann III (26'); second examination was with TMC: 84 stimuli (subset of grid 30 degrees -NO), stimulus size 34', stimulus luminance 320-370 cd/m(2), background luminance 8-20 cd/m(2). Pointwise accuracy (proportion of concordant locations), sensitivity, and specificity were estimated into 95% confidence intervals (CI) by averaging individual logits. Examination durations were compared. RESULTS: TMC results are highly concordant with O-101 results for all defect classes. For the entire sample, the percentage of discordant points (perceived with TMC but not with O-101) among all discordant points was 35% (CI: 30% to 40%). Analyzed by VFD pattern, accuracy was highest in healthy controls scotomas (97.9%; CI: 97% to 98.5%) and lowest in arcuate scotomas (80.6 %; CI: 77.3% to 83.5%). Sensitivity was highest in concentric constriction (94.5%; CI: 82.9% to 98.4%) and lowest in healthy controls (59.1%; CI: 26.3% to 85.3%). Specificity was highest in healthy controls (98.1%; CI: 96.6% to 98.9%) and lowest in concentric constriction (77.4%; CI: 62.1% to 87.7%). Mean examination time was 4.6 minutes (TMC) and 9.8 minutes (O-101). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the TMC is a feasible device for detection of VFD.
Authors:
Anna Bruckmann; Nicholas J Volpe; Jens Paetzold; Reinhard Vonthein; Ulrich Schiefer
Related Documents :
11925519 - Effects of stimulus parameters on seizure duration and ecs-induced retrograde amnesia.
9183979 - Does irrelevant stimulus location affect response selection?
21593549 - Retinal ganglion cell responses to voltage and current stimulation in wild-type and rd1...
10703269 - The importance of the convex hull for human performance on the traveling salesman probl...
22516479 - Light-regulated stomatal aperture in arabidopsis.
971379 - The wenckebach phenomenon between electric pacemaker and ventricle.
12642179 - Gaze during visually-guided locomotion in cats.
21549809 - Respiratory responses to somatostatin microinjections into the bötzinger complex and th...
16096779 - Can stooped posture explain multidirectional postural instability in patients with park...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of ophthalmology     Volume:  20     ISSN:  1120-6721     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur J Ophthalmol     Publication Date:    2010 Jan-Feb
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-04     Completed Date:  2010-04-01     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9110772     Medline TA:  Eur J Ophthalmol     Country:  Italy    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  149-57     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of T?bingen, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Perimetry / instrumentation*,  methods
Reproducibility of Results
Scotoma / diagnosis*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Visual Fields*
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Chronic macular edema medical treatment in Irvine-Gass syndrome: case report.
Next Document:  Unilateral optic atrophy preceding Coats disease in a girl with Parry-Romberg syndrome.