Document Detail


Comparison of GE Centricity Electronic Medical Record database and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey findings on the prevalence of major conditions in the United States.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20568974     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The study objective was to facilitate investigations by assessing the external validity and generalizability of the Centricity Electronic Medical Record (EMR) database and analytical results to the US population using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data and results as an appropriate validation resource. Demographic and diagnostic data from the NAMCS were compared to similar data from the Centricity EMR database, and the impact of the different methods of data collection was analyzed. Compared to NAMCS survey data on visits, Centricity EMR data shows higher proportions of visits by younger patients and by females. Other comparisons suggest more acute visits in Centricity and more chronic visits in NAMCS. The key finding from the Centricity EMR is more visits for the 13 chronic conditions highlighted in the NAMCS survey, with virtually all comparisons showing higher proportions in Centricity. Although data and results from Centricity and NAMCS are not perfectly comparable, once techniques are employed to deal with limitations, Centricity data appear more sensitive in capturing diagnoses, especially chronic diagnoses. Likely explanations include differences in data collection using the EMR versus the survey, particularly more comprehensive medical documentation requirements for the Centricity EMR and its inclusion of laboratory results and medication data collected over time, compared to the survey, which focused on the primary reason for that visit. It is likely that Centricity data reflect medical problems more accurately and provide a more accurate estimate of the distribution of diagnoses in ambulatory visits in the United States. Further research should address potential methodological approaches to maximize the validity and utility of EMR databases.
Authors:
Albert G Crawford; Christine Cote; Joseph Couto; Mehmet Daskiran; Candace Gunnarsson; Kara Haas; Sara Haas; Somesh C Nigam; Rob Schuette; Joseph Yaskin
Related Documents :
11933764 - Closing the loop between clinical practice, research, and education: the potential of e...
12463904 - Using loinc to link an emr to the pertinent paragraph in a structured reference knowled...
17945954 - Fragility issues of medical video streaming over 802.11e-wlan m-health environments.
9357584 - Cytobase: an electronic medical record for cervical cytology.
1317084 - Should semi-automatic defibrillators be used by emergency medical technicians in belgiu...
6719684 - Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. preliminary clinical results in 30 patients.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Population health management     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1942-7905     ISO Abbreviation:  Popul Health Manag     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-06-23     Completed Date:  2010-09-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101481266     Medline TA:  Popul Health Manag     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  139-50     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Thomas Jefferson University School of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acute Disease / epidemiology
Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data*
Bias (Epidemiology)
Chronic Disease / epidemiology
Data Collection* / methods,  standards
Databases, Factual / standards*
Documentation
Electronic Health Records*
Female
Health Care Surveys / standards*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Office Visits / statistics & numerical data
Prevalence*
Sex Distribution
United States / epidemiology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review.
Next Document:  Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: low-osmolar versus iso-osm...