Document Detail


Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20171354     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Many recent technological advancements have been made in the field of endodontics; however, comparatively few studies have evaluated their impact on tooth survival. This study compared the survival rates of endodontic treatment performed by using classic techniques (eg, instrumentation with stainless steel hand files, alternating 5.25% NaOCl and 3% H2O2 irrigation, mostly multiple treatment visits, and so on) versus those performed using more contemporary techniques (eg, instrumentation with hand and rotary nickel-titanium files, frequent single-visit treatment, NaOCl, EDTA, chlorhexidine, H2O2 irrigation, warm vertical or lateral condensation obturation, use of surgical microscopes, electronic apex locators, and so on). METHODS: Using a retrospective chart review, clinical data were obtained for 984 endodontically treated teeth in 857 patients. Survival was defined as radiographic evidence of the treated tooth being present in the oral cavity 12 months or more after initial treatment. A mixed-model Poisson regression analysis was used to compare failure rates. RESULTS: Of the 459 teeth in the classic group, there was an overall survival rate of 98% with an average follow-up time of 75.7 months. Of 525 teeth in the contemporary group, there was an overall survival rate of 96%, with an average follow-up time of 34 months. Considerably more treatments in the classic group were completed in multiple appointments (91%) than in the contemporary group (39%). More teeth in the classic group underwent posttreatment interventions (6.7% vs 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was noted between the two technique groups or between single or multiple visits in terms of survival.
Authors:
Chris H Fleming; Mark S Litaker; Larry W Alley; Paul D Eleazer
Related Documents :
2352104 - Human clinical and histologic responses to the placement of htr polymer particles in 11...
12887004 - Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in pat...
20630304 - Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rota...
9205914 - Retrospective analysis of factors related to clinical outcome of guided tissue regenera...
25281424 - Frequency and predictors of thrombus inside the guiding catheter during interventional ...
23794004 - Influence of the anterior-posterior femoral translation on the range of motion in cruci...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-01-25
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of endodontics     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1878-3554     ISO Abbreviation:  J Endod     Publication Date:  2010 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-02-22     Completed Date:  2010-07-13     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7511484     Medline TA:  J Endod     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  414-8     Citation Subset:  D    
Copyright Information:
Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Endodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Appointments and Schedules
Endodontics / trends*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)*
Retrospective Studies
Root Canal Therapy / instrumentation,  methods*
Survival Analysis
Tooth, Nonvital / therapy*
Treatment Failure

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Comprehensive Literature Review-Part III: Clinical Applications, Drawb...
Next Document:  Pulpal Blood Flow Measurement with Ultrasound Doppler Imaging.