Document Detail

Comparative Study of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Diagnosis Methods: Detection of MUC5AC mRNA and Goblet Cells in Corneal Epithelium.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22297031     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
PURPOSE: To evaluate a limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) diagnosis method based on the detection of the MUC5AC transcript by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in comparison with the standard diagnostic method based on goblet cell detection by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-hematoxylin staining, using samples obtained from corneal epithelium impression cytology (IC). DESIGN: Transversal, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: We studied 59 eyes from 43 patients clinically diagnosed with LSCD. METHODS: Impression cytology was used to gather cells from corneal and conjunctival epithelium from the same eye. The presence of goblet cells in the cornea was determined by PAS-hematoxylin staining, whereas the presence of the MUC5AC transcript was detected by RT-PCR using a custom-designed primer pair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Goblet cells in the corneal epithelium were detected by light microscopy, and the MUC5AC transcript was detected as the corresponding PCR amplicon in agarose gels. RESULTS: Our study included 59 corneal samples, together with their respective conjunctival samples for RT-PCR assays. Of these, 47 samples were also available for comparative PAS-hematoxylin staining. The MUC5AC amplicon was detected in 56 of 59 (94.9%) corneal epithelium samples. In contrast, conventional IC staining detected goblet cells in only 17 of 47 (36.2%) samples; these were not found in 27 of 47 (57.4%) samples (negative results), and 3 of 47 (6.4%) showed inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of the MUC5AC transcript in corneal epithelium is a more sensitive method to diagnose LSCD than the conventional PAS-hematoxylin method, although a minimum RNA concentration of 1.2 ng/μl is required for negative results to be reliable. Moreover, RT-PCR is a highly specific and more objective technique. Overall, these findings indicate that molecular analysis facilitates a more precise clinical diagnosis of LSCD, thereby reducing the risk of surgical failure. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Iker Garcia; Jaime Etxebarria; Ana Boto-de-Los-Bueis; David Díaz-Valle; Luis Rivas; Itziar Martínez-Soroa; Nerea Saenz; Carlos López; Almudena Del-Hierro-Zarzuelo; Rosa Méndez; Javier Soria; Nerea González; Tatiana Suárez; Arantxa Acera
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-1-30
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ophthalmology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1549-4713     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-2-2     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7802443     Medline TA:  Ophthalmology     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Bioftalmik, Parque Tecnológico de Vizcaya, Vizcaya, Spain.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Intraoperative ultrasonography-guided positioning of iodine 125 plaque brachytherapy in the treatmen...
Next Document:  Novel MSX1 mutation in a family with autosomal-dominant hypodontia of second premolars and third mol...