Document Detail


Comparative Evaluation of Pelvic Allograft Selection Methods.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23299829     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This paper presents a firsthand comparative evaluation of three different existing methods for selecting a suitable allograft from a bone storage bank. The three examined methods are manual selection, automatic volume-based registration, and automatic surface-based registration. Although the methods were originally published for different bones, they were adapted to be systematically applied on the same data set of hemi-pelvises. A thorough experiment was designed and applied in order to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The methods were applied on the whole pelvis and on smaller fragments, thus producing a realistic set of clinical scenarios. Clinically relevant criteria are used for the assessment such as surface distances and the quality of the junctions between the donor and the receptor. The obtained results showed that both automatic methods outperform the manual counterpart. Additional advantages of the surface-based method are in the lower computational time requirements and the greater contact surfaces where the donor meets the recipient.
Authors:
Habib Bousleiman; Laurent Paul; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Mauricio Reyes
Related Documents :
19061509 - Support vector machine versus logistic regression modeling for prediction of hospital m...
20613499 - Characterizing performance profiles of icus.
24926099 - Extraction of diffuse correlation spectroscopy flow index by integration of nth-order l...
24534719 - Pore size distribution of bioresorbable films using a 3-d diffusion nmr method.
23623739 - New method to estimate the sample size for calculation of a proportion assuming binomia...
11732969 - Predicting duration of posttraumatic amnesia (pta) from early pta measurements.
23227149 - Cavemen were better at depicting quadruped walking than modern artists: erroneous walki...
20367819 - The impact of record-linkage bias in the cox model.
1187769 - The validity of an equivalent point source (eps) assumption used in quantitative scanning.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-9
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of biomedical engineering     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1521-6047     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann Biomed Eng     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0361512     Medline TA:  Ann Biomed Eng     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland, habib.bousleiman@istb.unibe.ch.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Ultrasonic Evaluation of Bone Quality in Cadaver Ilia.
Next Document:  Soft-chemical synthesis and tunable luminescence of Tb(3+), Tm(3+)/Dy(3+)-doped SrY(2)O(4) phosphors...