Document Detail


Communication across the divide. A trial of structured communication between general practice and emergency departments.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11917836     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
AIM: To evaluate the impact of structured form letters for general practitioner to emergency department (ED) communication. METHOD: Study population: one hundred and fifty-five GPs with practices in the Liverpool local government area in metropolitan Sydney and patients referred by them to ED at Liverpool over five months from June to October 1998. Design: randomised control trial of GPs as unit of randomisation; intervention GPs were encouraged to follow a structured proforma for their written communication with the ED. Control GPs were left to usual referral procedures. The ED was encouraged to fax a brief report back to GPs using the form. Impact measures: the quality of the referral letters was evaluated using a checklist that included: reason for referral; examination finding; medical history; investigations; psychosocial history; allergies; drugs given in the surgery and present medication. Surveys were sent every month to GPs to assess communication from the ED and adverse events observed by GPs. RESULTS: Most letters from GPs to the ED contained information on reasons for referral, medical history and examination findings. Reasons for referral were present in 95% of the intervention group GPs' letters compared with 99% of those of the control group. Investigations were included with 27% and present medications in 37%. Letters from GPs in the intervention group were more likely to contain a psychosocial history than those in the control group (13% compared with 1%). Most GPs reported receiving a letter from the ED although this was rarely by fax; most were brought to them by the patient. Phone calls were received by about one in five GPs each month. Most GPs found both of these to be useful. There were no differences between communication received by GPs in the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that improvements to communication between GPs and EDs are difficult and may require a systemic change within general practice and the hospital. Electronic systems may allow the sort of reciprocal communication required to establish and sustain improvement.
Authors:
M F Harris; A Giles; B I O'Toole
Related Documents :
11613266 - Physician, heal thyself: the health and mortality of victorian doctors.
1268176 - Retinoblastoma occurring in four successive generations.
20158896 - General practitioners' perceptions of the effectiveness of medical interventions: an ex...
10169366 - Recruitment of medical practitioners to rural areas: a practical approach from the coal...
10367266 - Identifying medical center units with disproportionate shares of patient complaints.
11613266 - Physician, heal thyself: the health and mortality of victorian doctors.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Australian family physician     Volume:  31     ISSN:  0300-8495     ISO Abbreviation:  Aust Fam Physician     Publication Date:  2002 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-03-28     Completed Date:  2002-04-12     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0326701     Medline TA:  Aust Fam Physician     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  197-200     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Communication
Correspondence as Topic*
Data Collection
Emergency Service, Hospital / organization & administration*
Family Practice / organization & administration*
Forms and Records Control
Health Services Research
Humans
Interprofessional Relations*
Medical Audit
New South Wales
Referral and Consultation / organization & administration*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Medical fees. Medibank and Medicare.
Next Document:  Research capacity building in general practice. The new Australian scene.