| Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 23055180 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Comparative effectiveness research represents the kind of research that arguably more directly affects clinical practice and policy. It includes observational studies, clinical trials, and systematic syntheses of existing literature. In this commentary, I argue for the ongoing and critical role of randomization in comparative effectiveness, noting the key differences between practical and explanatory trials. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Michael S Lauer |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Statistics in medicine Volume: 31 ISSN: 1097-0258 ISO Abbreviation: Stat Med Publication Date: 2012 Nov |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2012-10-11 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8215016 Medline TA: Stat Med Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 3051-3 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Affiliation:
|
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Change in Cognitive Errors and Coping Over the Course of Brief Psychodynamic Intervention.
Next Document: Modulation of mutagenesis in eukaryotes by DNA replication fork dynamics and quality of nucleotide p...