Document Detail


Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23055180     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Comparative effectiveness research represents the kind of research that arguably more directly affects clinical practice and policy. It includes observational studies, clinical trials, and systematic syntheses of existing literature. In this commentary, I argue for the ongoing and critical role of randomization in comparative effectiveness, noting the key differences between practical and explanatory trials. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors:
Michael S Lauer
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Statistics in medicine     Volume:  31     ISSN:  1097-0258     ISO Abbreviation:  Stat Med     Publication Date:  2012 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-11     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8215016     Medline TA:  Stat Med     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3051-3     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Change in Cognitive Errors and Coping Over the Course of Brief Psychodynamic Intervention.
Next Document:  Modulation of mutagenesis in eukaryotes by DNA replication fork dynamics and quality of nucleotide p...