Document Detail


Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia: needle-through-needle or separate spaces?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15717699     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized and blinded study compared the performance of a new needle-through-needle (NTN) kit (Epistar; Medimex, Germany) with the double-space technique for providing combined spinal epidural anaesthesia during Caesarean section. METHODS: Following local Ethics Committee approval and patient consent, 200 females were randomized to receive combined spinal epidural anaesthesia by the double-space (n = 100) or NTN (n = 100) technique. The frequency with which the intrathecal component could achieve a T5 block to touch for Caesarean section without the need for epidural augmentation or an alternative technique was determined. The time from start of procedure to achieving a block height to T5 was recorded. Pain and backache at insertion, and at 24 h follow-up were recorded using a visual analogue scale. To remove any bias due to posture, 50% of each group were further randomized to receive their block in the sitting or in the left lateral position. To evaluate improvement of performance over time the success in the first 100 study patients were compared to the success in the second 100. RESULTS: A successful block to T5 with the double-space and NTN techniques were 80 vs. 54, odds ratio 0.29. Failure to enter the intrathecal space once the epidural space had been located occurred in 29 patients in the NTN group. Time to readiness for surgery was 15 min (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.7-17.4) and 12.9 min (95% CI: 11.5-14.3) for the double-space and NTN techniques, respectively. The median (interquartile range) visual analogue scores for discomfort at insertion were 30 (12.5-51.5) and 32 (12.75-60) and for postoperative backache 0 (0-10) and 0 (0-10.75) in the double-space and NTN groups, respectively. The number of epidural augmentations was similar in both the groups and posture made no difference. There was a tendency to increased success in the second half of the study. CONCLUSION: The double-space technique had a greater success rate than the NTN technique.
Authors:
S K Backe; Z Sheikh; R Wilson; G R Lyons
Related Documents :
8862379 - Thoracic versus lumbar epidural anesthesia's effect on pain control and ileus resolutio...
16880869 - Spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in the management of chronic low back pain: a preliminar...
18165599 - Intraarticular administration of ketorolac, morphine, and ropivacaine combined with int...
9195349 - Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia following repair of frontal encephaloc...
20953219 - Introduction of continuous regional analgesia via wound catheters in a peripheral hospi...
18511999 - Comparison of ct characteristics of extravertebral cement leakages after vertebroplasty...
18298399 - Long-term clinical review (10-20 years) after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate l...
7300409 - Detachment of the septal tricuspid leaflet during transatrial closure of isolated ventr...
14618059 - Internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation using rectilinear biphasic wav...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of anaesthesiology     Volume:  21     ISSN:  0265-0215     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur J Anaesthesiol     Publication Date:  2004 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-02-18     Completed Date:  2005-08-02     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8411711     Medline TA:  Eur J Anaesthesiol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  854-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. Samyuktha@doctors.org.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Anesthesia, Epidural / adverse effects,  instrumentation*,  methods
Anesthesia, Spinal / adverse effects,  instrumentation*,  methods
Anesthetics, Combined / therapeutic use*
Back Pain / etiology
Cesarean Section / methods
Female
Humans
Needles*
Odds Ratio
Pain / etiology
Pain Measurement / methods
Posture / physiology
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Combined

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Influence of underlying disease on the outcome of critically ill patients with acute renal failure.
Next Document:  Influence of microcatheter length on flow rates of disposable infusion kits.