| Clinician's use of the Statin Choice decision aid in patients with diabetes: a videographic study nested in a randomized trial. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 19366386 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECTIVE: To describe how clinicians use decision aids. BACKGROUND: A 98-patient factorial-design randomized trial of the Statin Choice decision vs. standard educational pamphlet; each participant had a 1:4 chance of receiving the decision aid during the encounter with the clinician resulting in 22 eligible encounters. DESIGN: Two researchers working independently and in duplicate reviewed and coded the 22 encounter videos. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two patients with diabetes (57% of them on statins) and six endocrinologists working in a referral diabetes clinic randomly assigned to use the decision aid during the consultation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion and nature of unintended use of the Statin Choice decision aid. RESULTS: We found eight encounters involving six clinicians who did not use the decision aid as intended either by not using it at all (n = 5; one clinician did use the decision aid in three encounters), offering inaccurate quantitative and probabilistic information about the risks and benefits of statins (n = 2), or using the decision aid to advance the agenda that all patients with diabetes should take statin (n = 1). Clinicians used the decision aid as intended in all other encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Unintended decision aid use in the context of videotaped encounters in a practical randomized trial was common. These instances offer insights to researchers seeking to design and implement effective decision aids for use during the clinical visit, particularly when clinicians may prefer to proceed in ways that the decision aid apparently contradicts. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Roberto Abadie; Audrey J Weymiller; Jon Tilburt; Nilay D Shah; Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Victor M Montori |
Related Documents
:
|
20419066 - Skip sequencing: a decision problem in questionnaire design. 10124676 - In the best interest of the patient. applying this standard to healthcare decision maki... 17317206 - Is there a role for decision aids in cancer-related decisions? 12002006 - Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: th... 9535526 - Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. 12166736 - Assignment of the in-plane molecular vibrations of the electron-donor molecule bdt-ttp ... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2009-04-02 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Volume: 15 ISSN: 1365-2753 ISO Abbreviation: J Eval Clin Pract Publication Date: 2009 Jun |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2009-06-15 Completed Date: 2009-09-22 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9609066 Medline TA: J Eval Clin Pract Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 492-7 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Health Sciences Doctoral Programs, Public Health, Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Choice Behavior* Decision Support Systems, Clinical* Diabetes Mellitus Health Personnel* Humans Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / therapeutic use* Video Recording |
| Chemical | |
Reg. No./Substance:
|
0/Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients in a clinical pathway gained less in health-rel...
Next Document: Satisfaction of osteoarthritis patients with provided care is not related to the disease-specific qu...