Document Detail


Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20299247     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the long-term stability of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). STUDY DESIGN: CLP patients requiring maxillary advancement of 4 to 10 mm were randomized and assigned to either CO or DO. In the CO group, the maxilla was fully mobilized to the preplanned position and fixed using titanium miniplates. In the DO group, the maxilla was mobilized to a limited extent and distractors were fixed on each side of the maxilla. Serial lateral cephalographs were taken for the assessment of stability at different postoperative periods up to 5 years. RESULTS: In the CO group, the maxilla relapsed backward and upward, whereas in the DO group, it advanced more forward and downward over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Distraction of the cleft maxilla can achieve better long-term skeletal stability in maintaining its advanced position than CO.
Authors:
Hannah Daile P Chua; Margareta Bendeus Hägg; Lim Kwong Cheung
Related Documents :
20805347 - Decontamination of viable streptococcus mutans from orthodontic tungsten carbide debond...
2617157 - Cinefluoroscopic study of long-term changes of bolus position and chewing cycle duratio...
16241177 - The effect of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in patients with cleft palate and velophar...
17614257 - Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction after mandibular reconstruction with free fib...
10475557 - Patient-reported health status in total joint replacement.
21677787 - Efficacy and safety of abciximab in diabetic patients who underwent percutaneous corona...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-03-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics     Volume:  109     ISSN:  1528-395X     ISO Abbreviation:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-10     Completed Date:  2010-08-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9508562     Medline TA:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  803-14     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Discipline of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cephalometry
Cleft Lip / surgery*
Cleft Palate / surgery*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class III / etiology,  surgery
Maxilla / abnormalities,  surgery*
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures / methods*
Osteogenesis, Distraction / methods*
Osteotomy, Le Fort / methods
Recurrence / prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Treatment outcomes of mandibular advancement devices in positional and nonpositional OSA patients.
Next Document:  Complication rates of operatively treated mandibular fractures-the mandibular neck.