Document Detail


Classification of rheumatologic opinion on early inflammatory arthritis: harmonization of a heterogeneous standard.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20506530     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Interrater variability limits rheumatologic opinion as a reference standard for early inflammatory arthritis (IA) classification. The study objectives were to determine whether rheumatologic opinion is associated with potential early IA classification methods despite high interrater variability, and to compare the relative strengths of those associations. METHODS: Eighteen rheumatologists independently classified 30 initial rheumatology presentation summaries as early IA or not and recommended a pharmacotherapy. Case fulfillment of the following classification methods was independently determined: early referral to rheumatology recommendation for rheumatoid arthritis (ERRR), common early IA cohort inclusion criteria (CEAC), and prevalent IA classification criteria (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]/European Spondylarthropathy Study Group [ESSG]). Associations between rheumatologic opinion, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) recommendation, and each classification method were determined. RESULTS: Participating rheumatologists published on early IA and represented 3 continents. The median case was age 43 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-53) years, had 40 (IQR 24-104) weeks of symptoms, 60 (IQR 18-120) minutes of morning stiffness, a swollen joint count of 6 (IQR 1-13), and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 25 (IQR 10-51) mm/hour. The mean ± SD multiple-rater kappa for rheumatologic opinion on early IA was 0.16 ± 0.02. The common odds ratios for associations between rheumatologic opinion and ERRR, CEAC, and ACR/ESSG were 10.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.6-23.2), 4.4 (95% CI 2.5-7.7), and 0.7 (95% CI 0.4-1.1), respectively. Odds ratios for associations between DMARD recommendation and ERRR, rheumatologic opinion, CEAC, and ACR/ESSG were 18.7 (95% CI 8.1-43.2), 10.6 (95% CI 6.0-18.8), 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.6), and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: Classification methods can be used to harmonize rheumatologic opinion of early IA despite high interrater variability. The ERRR is very strongly associated with both rheumatologic opinions of early IA and DMARD treatment recommendations.
Authors:
Ruben Tavares; George A Wells; Joel Scarf; Ria Cagaanan; Vivian P Bykerk; Mary J Bell
Publication Detail:
Type:  Case Reports; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Arthritis care & research     Volume:  62     ISSN:  2151-4658     ISO Abbreviation:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-08     Completed Date:  2010-10-26     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101518086     Medline TA:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1407-14     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ruben.tavares@sympatico.ca
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Age Factors
Antirheumatic Agents / therapeutic use
Arthritis, Rheumatoid / diagnosis*,  drug therapy,  pathology*
Cohort Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians / standards*
Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards
Rheumatology / methods,  standards*
Single-Blind Method
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Antirheumatic Agents

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Expression of GFAT1 and OGT in podocytes: transport of glucosamine and the implications for glucose ...
Next Document:  The association of pruritus with quality of life and disability in systemic sclerosis.