Document Detail


Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23299649     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
AIM: To compare dentoskeletal and soft tissue treatment effects of two alternative Class II division 1 treatment modalities (maxillary first permanent molar extraction versus Herbst appliance). METHODS: One-hundred-fifty-four Class II division 1 patients that had either been treated with extractions of the upper first molars and a lightwire multibracket (MB) appliance (n = 79; 38 girls, 41 boys) or non-extraction by means of a Herbst-MB appliance (n = 75; 35 girls, 40 boys). The groups were matched on age and sex. The average age at the start of treatment was 12.7 years for the extraction and for 13.0 years for the Herbst group. Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) lateral cephalograms were retrospectively analyzed using a standard cephalometric analysis and the sagittal occlusal analysis according to Pancherz. RESULTS: The SNA decrease was 1.10° (p = 0.001) more pronounced in the extraction group, the SNB angle increased 1.49° more in the Herbst group (p = 0.000). In the extraction group, a decrease in SNB angle (0.49°) was observed. The soft tissue profile convexity (N-Sn-Pog) decreased in both groups, which was 0.78° more (n. s.) pronounced in the Herbst group. The nasolabial angle increased significantly more (+ 2.33°, p = 0.025) in the extraction group. The mechanism of overjet correction in the extraction group was predominantly dental (65% dental and 35% skeletal changes), while in the Herbst group it was predominantly skeletal (58% skeletal and 42% dental changes) in origin. CONCLUSION: Both treatment methods were successful and led to a correction of the Class II division 1 malocclusion. Whereas for upper first molar extraction treatment more dental and maxillary effects can be expected, in case of Herbst treatment skeletal and mandibular effects prevail.
Authors:
J W Booij; J Goeke; E M Bronkhorst; C Katsaros; S Ruf
Related Documents :
11323879 - 'fluxes' and chemical solubility in dental porcelains.
10399409 - Dental materials: 1997 literature review.
23413639 - Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of angle class ii division 2 ma...
18254559 - Custom ceramic posts and cores: an overview of rationale and a new use for a proven tec...
18455859 - Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications.
10207529 - Highly cross-linked networks for dental applications obtained by photocuring of tris[2-...
15948489 - The challenge of leadership in technology and education.
11048269 - An overview of laser wavelengths used in dentistry.
19401069 - Comparison of the dental health of adults and children living in nsw with their counter...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1615-6714     ISO Abbreviation:  J Orofac Orthop     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9713484     Medline TA:  J Orofac Orthop     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, mrbooij@planet.nl.
Vernacular Title:
Klasse-II-Therapie mit Extraktion der ersten oberen Molaren oder Herbst-Behandlung: Dentoskeletale und Weichteileffekte im Vergleich.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Gender Differences in Drug Bioequivalence: Time to Rethink Practices.
Next Document:  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatm...