Document Detail

Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23299649     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
AIM: To compare dentoskeletal and soft tissue treatment effects of two alternative Class II division 1 treatment modalities (maxillary first permanent molar extraction versus Herbst appliance). METHODS: One-hundred-fifty-four Class II division 1 patients that had either been treated with extractions of the upper first molars and a lightwire multibracket (MB) appliance (n = 79; 38 girls, 41 boys) or non-extraction by means of a Herbst-MB appliance (n = 75; 35 girls, 40 boys). The groups were matched on age and sex. The average age at the start of treatment was 12.7 years for the extraction and for 13.0 years for the Herbst group. Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) lateral cephalograms were retrospectively analyzed using a standard cephalometric analysis and the sagittal occlusal analysis according to Pancherz. RESULTS: The SNA decrease was 1.10° (p = 0.001) more pronounced in the extraction group, the SNB angle increased 1.49° more in the Herbst group (p = 0.000). In the extraction group, a decrease in SNB angle (0.49°) was observed. The soft tissue profile convexity (N-Sn-Pog) decreased in both groups, which was 0.78° more (n. s.) pronounced in the Herbst group. The nasolabial angle increased significantly more (+ 2.33°, p = 0.025) in the extraction group. The mechanism of overjet correction in the extraction group was predominantly dental (65% dental and 35% skeletal changes), while in the Herbst group it was predominantly skeletal (58% skeletal and 42% dental changes) in origin. CONCLUSION: Both treatment methods were successful and led to a correction of the Class II division 1 malocclusion. Whereas for upper first molar extraction treatment more dental and maxillary effects can be expected, in case of Herbst treatment skeletal and mandibular effects prevail.
J W Booij; J Goeke; E M Bronkhorst; C Katsaros; S Ruf
Related Documents :
11890019 - Dental ceramics: what's new?
17209539 - Good night, squashbite: a 'how to' paper on better wax occlusal records.
264919 - Characterization of airborne particles from irreversible hydrocolloids.
19025349 - Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration.
23960489 - Orthognathic surgical norms for a sample of saudi adults: hard tissue measurements.
11908379 - Properties and characteristics of an indirect bis-gma/barium-glass polymer ceramic rest...
21988519 - Management of unilaterally deep impacted first, second, and third mandibular molars.
8441509 - Te niho waiora me te iwi maori: dental health and the maori people.
9161189 - The dental management of children with sickle cell disease and beta-thalassaemia: a rev...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1615-6714     ISO Abbreviation:  J Orofac Orthop     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9713484     Medline TA:  J Orofac Orthop     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
Vernacular Title:
Klasse-II-Therapie mit Extraktion der ersten oberen Molaren oder Herbst-Behandlung: Dentoskeletale und Weichteileffekte im Vergleich.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Gender Differences in Drug Bioequivalence: Time to Rethink Practices.
Next Document:  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatm...