Document Detail

Chronic anal and perianal pain resolved with MRI.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23617486     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of anorectal MRI in the care of patients with chronic anal and perianal pain but without findings of abnormalities in the clinical workup. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients referred from a tertiary department of colorectal surgery to the MRI unit with clinically occult chronic anal and perianal pain were included. MRI of the anorectum was performed with an endoanal or pelvic phased-array coil. The images from all examinations were read by two radiologists. MRI findings were correlated with clinical follow-up data. RESULTS. The study group (103 patients) was stratified into patients with no history of anorectal disease (n = 60) and those who had a history of surgery for anorectal disease (n = 43). MRI findings suggested the final diagnoses in 40 patients (39%). These diagnoses were 28 cases of suppurative lesions (27%), 11 cases of painful scarring of the anus (11%), and one case of metastasis to the sacrum (1%). Suppurative lesions were surgically proved with marked relief of pain after surgery. In the other patients the final diagnoses were 37 cases of levator ani syndrome (36%) and 26 cases of unspecified functional anorectal pain (25%). No MRI abnormalities were found in 33 of the patients with levator ani syndrome and 26 of the patients with unspecified anorectal pain. The two readers had very good agreement (κ = 0.92). The patients with a history of anorectal disease had significantly more MRI findings of abnormalities (60%) than did patients without a history of anorectal disease (23%). The positive predictive value of MRI was 91%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSION. In 39% of patients, MRI showed abnormalities that were clinically confirmed as the final diagnosis. Surgical treatment will especially benefit patients with suppurative lesions, resulting in relief of pain.
Roy S Dwarkasing; W Rudolf Schouten; Tychon E A Geeraedts; Litza E Mitalas; Wim C J Hop; Gabriel P Krestin
Related Documents :
24179906 - Stapled hemorrhoidectomy; results of a prospective clinical trial in saudi arabia.
23102076 - Glyceryl trinitrate ointment did not reduce pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a rand...
2178736 - A practitioner's views on fluid therapy in calves.
9888026 - Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy.
22520556 - Evaluation of the postoperative lumbar spine.
22254696 - Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and skin conductance: a comparison study of acute pain i...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  200     ISSN:  1546-3141     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2013 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-04-26     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1034-41     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
1 Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging, Erasmus MC, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rm Hs-257, 's-Gravendijkwal 2303015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Determinants of second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography in potential living liver...
Next Document:  Distinguishing benign and life-threatening pneumatosis intestinalis in patients with cancer by CT im...