|Chasing the reflected wave back into the heart: a new hypothesis while the jury is still out.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21731888 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness directly influences cardiac function and is independently associated with cardiovascular risk. However, the influence of the aortic reflected pulse pressure wave on left ventricular function has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to obtain detailed information on regional ventricular wall motion patterns corresponding to the propagation of the reflected aortic wave on ventricular segments.
METHODS: Left ventricular wall motion was investigated in a group of healthy volunteers (n = 14, age 23 ± 3 years), using cardiac magnetic resonance navigator-gated tissue phase mapping. The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and regional wall motion was studied in high temporal detail.
RESULTS: Corresponding to the expected timing of the reflected aortic wave reaching the left ventricle, a characteristic "notch" of regional myocardial motion was seen in all radial, circumferential, and longitudinal velocity graphs. This notch was particularly prominent in septal segments adjacent to the left ventricular outflow tract on radial velocity graphs and in anterior and posterior left ventricular segments on circumferential velocity graphs. Similarly, longitudinal velocity graphs demonstrated a brief deceleration in the upward recoil motion of the entire ventricle at the beginning of diastole.
CONCLUSION: These results provide new insights into the possible influence of the reflected aortic waves on ventricular segments. Although the association with the reflected wave appears to us to be unambiguous, it represents a novel research concept, and further studies enabling the actual recording of the pulse wave are required.
|Ion Codreanu; Matthew D Robson; Oliver J Rider; Tammy J Pegg; Bernd A Jung; Constantin A Dasanu; Kieran Clarke; Cameron J Holloway|
Related Documents :
|10148638 - Use of echocardiography in detecting cardiac sources of embolus.
3744948 - Hypoxia mediated binding of misonidazole in non-malignant tissue.
18296828 - Systolic dysfunction in urban japan.
18644908 - Lacunar infarcts: no black holes in the brain are benign.
17425158 - Correlation between the aptt and clinical events in acute coronary syndromes treated wi...
17979778 - Npy and cardiac diseases.
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2011-06-08|
|Title: Vascular health and risk management Volume: 7 ISSN: 1178-2048 ISO Abbreviation: Vasc Health Risk Manag Publication Date: 2011|
|Created Date: 2011-07-06 Completed Date: 2011-10-28 Revised Date: 2014-02-20|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101273479 Medline TA: Vasc Health Risk Manag Country: New Zealand|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 365-73 Citation Subset: IM|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Aorta / physiology*
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Regional Blood Flow
Ventricular Function, Left*
|G0700796//Medical Research Council; G0900883//Medical Research Council; PS/02/002/14893//British Heart Foundation; RG/07/004/22659//British Heart Foundation; //British Heart Foundation|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Vasc Health Risk Manag
Journal ID (publisher-id): Vascular Health and Risk Management
Publisher: Dove Medical Press
© 2011 Codreanu et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Received Day: 7 Month: 6 Year: 2011
collection publication date: Year: 2011
Print publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 08 Month: 6 Year: 2011
Volume: 7First Page: 365 Last Page: 373
PubMed Id: 21731888
Publisher Id: vhrm-7-365
|Chasing the reflected wave back into the heart: a new hypothesis while the jury is still out|
|Matthew D Robson2|
|Oliver J Rider2|
|Tammy J Pegg2|
|Bernd A Jung3|
|Constantin A Dasanu4|
|Cameron J Holloway12|
1Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford;
2University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Oxford, UK;
3Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany;
4Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA
|Correspondence: Correspondence: Ion Codreanu, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK, Tel +44 1865 221 869, Fax +44 1865 221 111, Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Left ventricular contraction leads to a pressure wave within the aorta, which is amplified as it travels down the arterial wall in advance of blood flow, and generates an arterial pulse. When the wave reaches major branching points, additional waves are generated and reflected back, which are similarly amplified as they travel back toward the heart. The magnitude and timing of the reflected waves are altered in cardiovascular disease and are modulated by therapies.1 Both increased arterial stiffness and increased wave reflections alter cardiac function and are independent predictors of cardiovascular risk.1,2 Despite the well-described relationship between arterial pressure waves and cardiac function,3–5 the effects of reflected arterial waves on ventricular motion patterns have not been described.
There have been two main schools of thought describing the hemodynamics of the arterial system. The Windkessel theory views the arterial system as a compliance and resistance pair, relating pulse pressure to arterial compliance and peripheral resistance. The model assumes that arterial pulse wavelengths are infinite.6 The transmission theory views the arterial system as a network of vessels that transmits pulses, which have a certain finite pulse wavelength. The pulse pressure in this model is affected by the magnitude, timing, and sites of pulse wave reflection.6 Decreasing heart rate (ie, pulse frequency) by one third increases the pulse wavelength by 50%.6 Similarly, increasing vessel radii by 50% or decreasing arterial compliance by 55.5% increases the pulse wavelength by 50%.6 These examples demonstrate the complexity of the interactions in the cardiovascular system and the effects of mechanical arterial properties on the pumping ventricle.
The forward travelling (incident) wave depends on the pressure generated by left ventricular contraction and arterial elasticity, while the reflected wave is related to the sites of wave reflection and mechanical arterial properties.7–9 The reflected wave alters arterial wall motion with an amplitude almost similar to that of the incident wave, giving the pulse wave in large arteries a dicrotic shape (Figure 1). It has been reported that changes in pulse wave contour could readily be explained on the basis of increased stiffness of the aorta and early return of wave reflection.10,11
However, how this reflected pulse wave alters left ventricular motion, and whether it contributes to diastolic function in healthy and diseased hearts, is not established. To determine the effects of the reflected aortic wave on the heart, we used a cardiac magnetic resonance technique with high temporal resolution (navigator-gated tissue phase mapping) to record changes in three-dimensional left ventricular wall motion in normal healthy subjects.
Cardiac magnetic resonance examinations were performed using a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonata scanner (Siemans Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Malvern, PA) on 14 healthy male volunteers. At the initial assessment visit, a medical history was taken and a screening examination was performed to exclude any cardiovascular, endocrine, or neuromuscular disease. An electrocardiogram was performed for an accurate assessment of heart rate. Baseline characteristics of the study participants are provided in Table 1.
Cine images for navigator-gated high temporal resolution tissue phase mapping were acquired using a black blood segmented k-space gradient echo sequence12,13 (repetition time = 13.8 msec, echo time = 5.0 msec, flip angle = 15°, bandwidth = 650 Hz/pixel, field of view = 400 × 300 mm, matrix =256 × 96) with a temporal resolution of 13.8 msec. Three short axis images were acquired for the left ventricular base, mid ventricle, and apex. Tissue phase mapping analysis was performed using customized software (Matlab, version 6.5, Mathworks, Natick, MA). The endocardial and epicardial borders were manually contoured for the base, mid ventricle, and apex in each phase of the cardiac cycle. For tissue phase mapping analysis, the left ventricle was divided into 16 segments (six basal, six middle, and four apical) according to the American Society of Echocardiography and American Heart Association models.14 Inplane velocities were transformed into an internal polar coordinate system positioned at the center of mass of the left ventricle. As a result, motion parameters are described in terms of radial, circumferential, and longitudinal velocities. Global and regional velocity time courses were calculated as the mean of all myocardial pixels within the segmentation mask or within the 16 segments, respectively. All myocardial velocities are expressed as cm/sec. Circumferential velocities are described as clockwise or counterclockwise, as viewed from the ventricular apex. The duration of the cardiac cycle was determined by the R-R interval on the electrocardiogram, with end systole defined as the smallest left ventricular cavity, as previously described.15 The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by a local Oxfordshire Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Each subject provided written informed consent.
The radial, circumferential, and longitudinal motion patterns of the heart are demonstrated in Figures 2–4. In addition to the large motion patterns observed in each segment, a wave of altered motion (Figures 2–4), is consistently seen in early diastole, corresponding to the expected timing of the reflected aortic wave reaching the left ventricle (Figure 1).
Radial velocities from individual left ventricular segments, as well as average values for the left ventricular base, mid ventricle, and apex during a cardiac cycle, are shown in Figure 2. Positive values demonstrate myocardial wall motion toward the center of the ventricle, while negative values reflect an outward motion.
The radial notch in early diastole has an upright deflection and resembles the dicrotic notch of the arterial pulse wave (Figure 2) and corresponds to a brief thrust of inward movement in early diastole (when the notch is above zero) or a sudden deceleration in the radial expansion of the ventricular wall (when the notch is below zero). On the segmental velocity curves, this early diastolic notch was particularly prominent in the septal segments (2, 3, 8, and 9). In the lateral segments (5–6 at the ventricular base, 11–12 at the mid ventricular level) the notch was above zero, indicating an additional thrust of inward movement at the beginning of diastole. In most other segments, the notch was below zero, indicating a brief deceleration in radial expansion. This early diastolic notch was more prominent in the basal segments and less prominent in the apical segments, which are located further away from the attachment of the aorta to the left ventricular outflow tract (ie, segments 12–16).
The velocity of the longitudinal left ventricular segments during a cardiac cycle is shown in Figure 3. These graphs represent average values for all volunteers. Positive values reflect downward motion along the longitudinal left ventricular axis (ie, toward the apex) and negative values show upward motion (ie, toward the base). The early diastolic notch observed in all left ventricular segments (Figure 3) demonstrates a brief deceleration in the upward recoil motion of the entire ventricle at the beginning of diastole, corresponding to the expected impact with the reflected pulse wave travelling in the opposite direction.
The circumferential or rotational velocities of individual left ventricular segments, as well as average values for the left ventricular base, mid ventricle, and apex are shown in Figure 4. Positive values reflect clockwise rotation and negative values reflect counterclockwise rotation, as viewed from the apex. A brief clockwise motion occurred at the beginning of diastole in most basal segments (Figure 4). At the left ventricular apex and mid ventricle, the notch was superimposed on a larger wave of clockwise rotation of the left ventricular apex during ventricular untwisting (Figure 4).
The arterial pressure wave represents a superposition of two separate waves, that is, the incident wave travelling from the heart toward the periphery, and the reflected wave travelling from the periphery and the sites of wave reflection toward the heart.7–9 As opposed to blood flow, the pulse pressure wave spreads almost instantaneously and is amplified as it travels. The reflected aortic wave travels at a similar speed to the incident wave but in an opposite direction and is amplified as it travels toward the heart, reaching it in late systole or early diastole. Moreover, the reflected wave alters arterial wall motion with an amplitude almost similar to that of the incident wave, suggesting it influences the motion patterns of the aorta and left ventricle.
For the first time, we have linked early diastolic segmental motion patterns and the associated changes in radial, circumferential, and longitudinal left ventricular motion with the reflected aortic pulse wave reaching the left ventricle. The upright notch on the radial velocity graphs in early diastole (Figure 2) corresponds to a sudden deceleration in the commencement of radial relaxation, or even a brief inward motion in separate segments. As the front of the reflected wave travelling toward the heart was directed inwards (Figure 1), it is conceivable that it caused a brief inward displacement, or a brief deceleration in the ongoing radial expansion when reaching the left ventricle (Figure 2). The subsequent outward directed part of the reflected wave (Figure 1), responsible for the dicrotic shape of the pulse wave (Figure 1), was superimposed on the ongoing radial expansion in diastole. The prominence of this early diastolic notch in septal segments (2, 3, 8, and 9) may be explained by the close proximity of the aorta to the septum, the inline wave propagation on these adjacent segments having a greater mechanical effect (Figure 5). This is further supported by a similar shape of the reflected wave in the aorta and membranous septum, which form a continuous structure with no mechanical barriers for pulse wave propagation.
Longitudinal motion patterns reveal a sudden deceleration in the upward motion of the entire ventricle at the beginning of diastole (Figure 3), which may be explained by the impact of the reflected pressure wave travelling in an opposite direction. Moreover, the brief early diastolic notch of clockwise rotation seen on circumferential velocity graphs (Figure 4) suggests the reflected wave leads to a brief clockwise rotation when reaching these segments. The orientation of the aortic arch and attachment of the ascending aorta to the left ventricle may explain this mechanically driven clockwise motion. A schematic representation of this motion is provided in Figure 6.
The early diastolic notch that we have described has been reported in studies of radial left ventricular motion using other techniques, with various proposed explanations.16–18 The notch is also observed in the first studies of myocardial motion obtained using high temporal resolution magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping.12 Garcia et al suggested that the notch reflects geometric changes caused by asynchronous contraction and ventricular interdependence.16 Sengupta et al suggested the notch was associated with asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial left ventricular wall layers.18 In line with these hypotheses, the reflected wave may influence the epicardium, mid-myocardium, and endocardium to different degrees. The magnitude and force of the reflected pulse waves are sufficiently high to cause an aortic pulsation (Figure 1), and the effect on ventricular segments is consistent with the recorded asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial layers,18 with a sudden interruption of late systolic lengthening17 and with accentuation in stiff arteries and ischemic heart disease.19
There is no expected difference between the timing of the reflected wave reaching the left ventricle and the commencement of aortic valve closure, which is consistent with the experiments by Remme et al.17 Given that the pulse wave spreads almost instantaneously throughout the body, propagation of the reflected wave is expected to be synchronous throughout the left ventricle, as previously shown.17 Myocardial motion secondary to the reflected aortic wave would be expected to decrease after a sudden drop in systemic pressure, as Remme et al observed after mitral valve stenting (the amplitude of both incident and reflected waves would be lower in this case).17 In addition, placing a stent in the aortic valve orifice and inflating it to the point of preventing aortic valve closure led to a mechanical obstacle, preventing propagation of the reflected wave from the aorta to the ventricular segments.17 However, replacing the valve did not obstruct the wave propagation, if the size of the prosthesis matched the size of the aortic lumen.17
Although the effects of aortic reflected waves on ventricular motion pattern in disease states have not been studied, it has been established that early return of reflected wave boosts (central) systolic blood pressure, increasing the load on the heart and boosting the amplitude of the pressure pulse.20 Increased peripheral wave reflection has actually been recorded in chronic heart failure.3 Therefore, it is entirely plausible that the reflected pulse wave may adversely influence ventricular function in disease states. Pulse wave velocity is a strong predictor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in hypertension21 and chronic renal disease,22–25 and is independently related to coronary outcome in atherosclerosis,26 suggesting that it plays both a functional and prognostic role in cardiovascular disease. In addition, the aortic wave reflections may also have important implications for optimization of therapy.27 For example, from all the therapeutic agents used in essential hypertension, arterial wave reflections decreased only following perindopril, outlining a potential role for this drug to alter the effect of the reflected wave on cardiovascular function.28
Our results suggest that propagation of the reflected pulse wave may affect early diastolic radial, circumferential, and longitudinal ventricular motion in healthy subjects. In addition, we have previously described the shape of this late systolic/early diastolic notch change in an older age group, affecting the pattern of ventricular motion in early diastole.29 We have previously described that the pattern of diastolic motion is different in patients with ischemic heart disease.29 The myocardial velocity graphs for two such patients are provided in Figure 7. Large artery stiffening may be both a cause and a consequence of atherosclerosis, and there is clear experimental and clinical evidence that large artery stiffening promotes myocardial ischemia secondary to central pulse pressure elevation.26 A combination of excessive inward movement during the phase of isovolumic relaxation accompanied by reduced peak systolic and diastolic wall velocities in patients with coronary artery disease16,19 is also consistent with systemic arterial involvement and accentuated wave reflections in most patients with stenotic coronary arteries. The findings are similar to those recorded in our 69-year-old patient with ischemic heart disease and associated peripheral vascular disease (Figure 7). In the patient with a massive left ventricular scar, it seems the reflected wave freely propagated along the scar tissue without being absorbed. Moreover, the wave was apparently amplified as it travelled toward the apex, like in a rigid tube (arrows in Figures 7A, 7B, and 7C). The findings can serve as a distinct example of the effects of reflected waves on ventricular motion patterns and their clinical relevance. However, these represent individual cases, and further studies involving larger groups of patients with different cardiac and vascular pathology are required to validate our data. Furthermore, quantifying the reflected wave may provide important information in disease states. Methods which enable reflected wave quantification are important considerations.30 Consequently, the effects of reflected waves on ventricular motion patterns in cardiovascular disease require further investigation and may yield new insights into the mechanisms of diastolic dysfunction in cardiac pathology.
The high temporal resolution navigator-gated tissue phase mapping technique has allowed registration of tiny details of three-dimensional motion of myocardial segments, but the registration of pulse wave propagation on the aortic wall was not possible in the magnetic resonance scanner. We are describing this concept for the first time and believe it deserves further attention, at least as a possible cause for the recorded motion patterns.
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
This research was funded by the British Heart Foundation, and was supported by the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, with funding from the Department of Health’s National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.
|1..||Palombo C,Malshi E,Morizzo C,et al. Arterial wave reflection during antihypertensive therapy with barnidipine: a 6-month, open-label study using an integrated cardiovascular ultrasound approach in patients with newly diagnosed hypertensionClin TherYear: 200931122873288520110026|
|2..||Safar ME,Blacher J,Pannier B,et al. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal diseaseHypertensionYear: 200239373573811897754|
|3..||Curtis SL,Zambanini A,Mayet J,et al. Reduced systolic wave generation and increased peripheral wave reflection in chronic heart failureAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 20072931H557H56217400718|
|4..||Jones CJ,Sugawara M. “Wavefronts” in the aorta – implications for the mechanisms of left ventricular ejection and aortic valve closureCardiovasc ResYear: 19932711190219058287392|
|5..||Laskey WK,Kussmaul WG. Arterial wave reflection in heart failureCirculationYear: 19877547117223829333|
|6..||Mohiuddin MW,Laine GA,Quick CM. Increase in pulse wavelength causes the systemic arterial tree to degenerate into a classical windkesselAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 20072932H1164H117117483241|
|7..||Berger DS,Robinson KA,Shroff SG. Wave propagation in coupled left ventricle-arterial system: implications for aortic pressureHypertensionYear: 1996275107910898621200|
|8..||Khir AW,O’Brien A,Gibbs JS,Parker KH. Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteriesJ BiomechYear: 20013491145115511506785|
|9..||Pythoud F,Stergiopulos N,Meister JJ. Separation of arterial pressure waves into their forward and backward running componentsJ Biomech EngYear: 199611832953018872250|
|10..||O’Rourke MF,Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysisJ Hypertens SupplYear: 1996145S147S1579120672|
|11..||O’Rourke MF,Kelly RP. Wave reflection in the systemic circulation and its implications in ventricular functionJ HypertensYear: 19931143273378390498|
|12..||Jung B,Foll D,Bottler P,Petersen S,Hennig J,Markl M. Detailed analysis of myocardial motion in volunteers and patients using high-temporal-resolution MR tissue phase mappingJ Magn Reson ImagingYear: 20062451033103916947325|
|13..||Jung B,Markl M,Foll D,Hennig J. Investigating myocardial motion by MRI using tissue phase mappingEur J Cardiothorac SurgYear: 200629Suppl 1S150S15716563784|
|14..||Cerqueira MD,Weissman NJ,Dilsizian V,et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart AssociationCirculationYear: 2002105453954211815441|
|15..||Codreanu I,Robson MD,Golding SJ,Jung BA,Clarke K,Holloway CJ. Longitudinally and circumferentially directed movements of the left ventricle studied by cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity mappingJ Cardiovasc Magn ResonYear: 201012484820716369|
|16..||Garcia MJ,Rodriguez L,Ares M,et al. Myocardial wall velocity assessment by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging: characteristic findings in normal subjectsAm Heart JYear: 199613236486568800038|
|17..||Remme EW,Lyseggen E,Helle-Valle T,et al. Mechanisms of preejection and postejection velocity spikes in left ventricular myocardium: Interaction between wall deformation and valve eventsCirculationYear: 2008118437338018606917|
|18..||Sengupta PP,Khandheria BK,Korinek J,Wang J,Belohlavek M. Biphasic tissue Doppler waveforms during isovolumic phases are associated with asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial layersJ Appl PhysiolYear: 20059931104111115905326|
|19..||Gibson DG,Prewitt TA,Brown DJ. Analysis of left ventricular wall movement during isovolumic relaxation and its relation to coronary artery diseaseBr Heart JYear: 1976381010101019973874|
|20..||Kips JG,Rietzschel ER,De Buyzere ML,et al. Evaluation of noninvasive methods to assess wave reflection and pulse transit time from the pressure waveform aloneHypertensionYear: 200953214214919075098|
|21..||Laurent S,Boutouyrie P,Asmar R,et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patientsHypertensionYear: 20013751236124111358934|
|22..||Blacher J,Guerin AP,Pannier B,Marchais SJ,Safar ME,London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal diseaseCirculationYear: 199999182434243910318666|
|23..||Blacher J,Safar ME,Pannier B,Guerin AP,Marchais SJ,London GM. Prognostic significance of arterial stiffness measurements in end-stage renal disease patientsCurr Opin Nephrol HypertensYear: 200211662963412394609|
|24..||Guerin AP,Blacher J,Pannier B,Marchais SJ,Safar ME,London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness attenuation on survival of patients in end-stage renal failureCirculationYear: 2001103798799211181474|
|25..||London GM,Blacher J,Pannier B,Guerin AP,Marchais SJ,Safar ME. Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failureHypertensionYear: 200138343443811566918|
|26..||Kingwell BA,Ahimastos AA. Arterial stiffness and coronary ischaemic diseaseAdv CardiolYear: 20074412513817075203|
|27..||De Luca N,Mallion JM,O’Rourke MF,et al. Regression of left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients treated with perindopril/indapamide as a first-line combination: the REASON echocardiography studyAm J HypertensYear: 200417866066715323062|
|28..||Pannier BM,Guerin AP,Marchais SJ,London GM. Different aortic reflection wave responses following long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and beta-blocker in essential hypertensionClin Exp Pharmacol PhysiolYear: 200128121074107711903319|
|29..||Codreanu I,Holloway CJ,Pegg TJ,Robson MD,Neubauer S,Clarke K. New details of reflected pressure wave propagation on left ventricular segmentsJ Cardiovasc Magn ResonYear: 201012Suppl 1127|
|30..||Westerhof BE,Guelen I,Westerhof N,Karemaker JM,Avolio A. Quantification of wave reflection in the human aorta from pressure alone: A proof of principleHypertensionYear: 200648459560116940207|
Keywords: arterial pressure wave, reflected wave, ventricular wall motion, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, tissue phase mapping.
Previous Document: Aldosterone and aldosterone receptor antagonists in patients with chronic heart failure.
Next Document: Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome.