Document Detail

Challenges of technology integration and computer-assisted surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19182015     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The rapid progress of modern computerized capabilities has not been paralleled by a similar progress in the operating room setting and in operating techniques. The major advance in orthopaedic surgery during the past fifty years has been the introduction of intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while surgical techniques have remained mostly unchanged. Orthopaedic procedures dealing with bones--a nondeformable tissue--are suitable for computerized guidance based on preoperatively and intraoperatively obtained images. Computer-assisted surgery progressed from the first-generation systems of the 1990 s to the present third-generation systems, enabling surgeons to implant a knee or hip prosthesis with high precision. However, most orthopaedic surgeons avoid using computer-navigation surgical techniques. Why has the implementation of computer-assisted surgery procedures met so many hurdles and obstacles? The factors that make up the answer to this question can be grouped into three categories: human, technological, and financial. Computer-assisted surgery has the potential to revolutionize orthopaedic surgery just as fluoroscopy did a few decades ago; however, its widespread use has been hampered by a lack of sufficient clinical data on the one hand and by a reluctance to use the technique and thereby collect and share data on the other. The challenge is to overcome the human, technological, and financial hurdles. Once these obstacles are addressed, we believe that computer-assisted surgery will set a new standard of care. Until that time, some will be willing to lead the revolution and pay the price of progress, and others will be reluctant to take part in this endeavor.
Gurion Rivkin; Meir Liebergall
Related Documents :
20528355 - Patient-reported outcomes to evaluate surgery.
19223695 - Feasibility of an operational standardized checklist for movement disorder surgery. a p...
17673355 - Do patients want to see recordings of their surgery?
18308115 - Impact of stapling devices on radical cystectomy: comparative study between low- and hi...
24375955 - A shape memory alloy-actuated surgical instrument with compact volume.
19934925 - Outcomes after fistulotomy: results of a prospective, multicenter regional study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume     Volume:  91 Suppl 1     ISSN:  1535-1386     ISO Abbreviation:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Publication Date:  2009 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-02-02     Completed Date:  2009-03-17     Revised Date:  2010-10-25    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0014030     Medline TA:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  13-6     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Orthopedic Procedures*
Surgery, Computer-Assisted*
Technology Transfer

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Perspectives on computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: movement toward quantitative orthopaedic surg...
Next Document:  The challenges of clinical validation of emerging technologies: computer-assisted devices for surger...