Document Detail


Certainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to C.S. Peirce rather than Gödel for a theory of clinical reasoning.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9406107     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This paper argues that Gödel's proof does not provide the appropriate conceptual basis on which to counter the claims of evidence-based medicine. The nature of, and differences between, deductive, inductive and abductive inference are briefly surveyed. The work of the American logician C.S. Peirce is introduced as a possible framework for a theory of clinical reasoning which can ground the claims of both evidence-based medicine and its critics.
Authors:
R Upshur
Related Documents :
17389537 - Practice-based referrals to a tobacco cessation quit line: assessing the impact of comp...
17138407 - The evidence supporting alternative management strategies for early occlusal caries and...
17683297 - Sources of knowledge in clinical practice in postgraduate medical students and faculty ...
19831227 - The "experience-based medicine" of the thirteenth century.
4819157 - Factors affecting work load in general practice. ii.
7299727 - Vocational training: work in a developing country and british general practice.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comment; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of evaluation in clinical practice     Volume:  3     ISSN:  1356-1294     ISO Abbreviation:  J Eval Clin Pract     Publication Date:  1997 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-01-23     Completed Date:  1998-01-23     Revised Date:  2001-11-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9609066     Medline TA:  J Eval Clin Pract     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  201-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Community Medicine Residency Programme, University of Toronto, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Evidence-Based Medicine / methods*
Logic*
Models, Statistical*
Philosophy
Comments/Corrections
Comment On:
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Apr;3(2):145-8   [PMID:  9276590 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Interpreting health outcomes.
Next Document:  Meta-analyses using individual patient data.