Document Detail


Carotid sinus nerve blockade during carotid surgery: a randomised controlled trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12443741     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: we investigated whether carotid sinus nerve infiltration with lignocaine reduced blood pressure lability during the first 24h following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). DESIGN: prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. MATERIALS: eighty patients undergoing CEA for significant symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. METHODS: after initial dissection, 5 ml of 1% lignocaine or normal saline placebo according to randomisation was infiltrated around the carotid sinus nerve. Blood pressure was measured by intra-arterial cannula during surgery and for four hours afterwards every 15 min, then manually, hourly for 18 h. RESULTS: patients having excision of the carotid sinus nerve were grouped separately for analysis: 29 patients had lignocaine, 33 placebo and 17 excision (one early death with incomplete data was excluded). Mean systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures did not differ significantly between the three groups before carotid sinus nerve infiltration. After infiltration, those patients who had carotid sinus nerve excision, had significantly higher systolic [mean (SD)=155 (16)mmHg] and diastolic [75 (9)mmHg] pressures than those receiving LA [systolic=136 (15)mmHg, diastolic=65 (10)mmHg] or placebo [systolic=136 (19)mmHg, diastolic=65 (9)mmHg], (p<0.005 ANOVA). Nerve excision also resulted in wider variability of blood pressure as defined by the mean of individual standard deviations (systolic=25 mmHg, diastolic=13 mmHg) compared to LA (systolic=19 mmHg, diastolic=12 mmHg) or placebo (systolic=18 mmHg, diastolic=10 mmHg) (p<0.05 ANOVA). Normotensive patients had significantly lower mean diastolic pressures (p<0.001 ANOVA) and variability (p<0.05) if they received lignocaine although this did not influence pulse pressure. CONCLUSIONS: lignocaine injection of the carotid sinus nerve has no benefit in those patients with existing treated hypertension and only marginal effects in normotensives. It is more important to preserve the carotid sinus nerve if possible.
Authors:
S J Fearn; A J Mortimer; E B Faragher; C N McCollum
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1078-5884     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg     Publication Date:  2002 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-11-21     Completed Date:  2003-01-02     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9512728     Medline TA:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  480-4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia, Local*
Anesthetics, Local / pharmacology*
Blood Pressure / drug effects*
Carotid Artery, Internal / drug effects,  innervation*,  surgery*
Carotid Sinus / drug effects*,  innervation*,  surgery
Carotid Stenosis / surgery*
Double-Blind Method
Endarterectomy, Carotid*
Female
Humans
Lidocaine / pharmacology*
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Block*
Prospective Studies
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anesthetics, Local; 137-58-6/Lidocaine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Vascular surgical complications of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
Next Document:  Minimally invasive or conventional aorto-bifemoral by-pass. A randomised study.