|Capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity: case report and review of the literature.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20179805 Owner: NLM Status: PubMed-not-MEDLINE|
|Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), has been integrated into the management of multiple cancer types because of convenience of administration and efficacy comparable with 5fu. Cardiotoxicity induced by 5FU-in particular angina-has been well described in the literature, but reports of adverse cardiac events with capecitabine are also emerging. The mechanism underlying 5FU cardiotoxicity has long been thought to result from coronary vasospasm, but animal-model studies and patient echocardiographic findings both suggest a cardiomyopathic picture. Although 5FU cardiotoxicity is often reversible and can be managed supportively, presentations that are more severe-including arrhythmias, acute ischemic events, and cardiogenic shock-have been documented. In this report, we describe the case of a patient who ultimately required a pacemaker after developing symptomatic bradycardia and sinus arrest while receiving capecitabine for colon cancer.|
|C Ang; M Kornbluth; M P Thirlwell; R D Rajan|
Related Documents :
|23095215 - Twice recurrent gallstone ileus: a case report.
12022905 - Priapism associated with zuclopenthixol.
18230055 - The use of dexrazoxane for the prevention of anthracycline extravasation injury.
23864745 - Fatal balamuthia amebic encephalitis in a healthy child: a case report with review of s...
12220145 - Epidemiology of variant cjd.
7576285 - Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy localized to the sella.
|Type: Journal Article|
|Title: Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Volume: 17 ISSN: 1198-0052 ISO Abbreviation: Curr Oncol Publication Date: 2010 Feb|
|Created Date: 2010-02-24 Completed Date: 2011-07-14 Revised Date: 2013-05-29|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9502503 Medline TA: Curr Oncol Country: Canada|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 59-63 Citation Subset: -|
|Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Curr Oncol
Journal ID (publisher-id): CO
Publisher: Multimed Inc., 66 Martin St. Milton, ON, Canada L9T 2R2
2010 Multimed Inc.
Print publication date: Month: 2 Year: 2010
Volume: 17 Issue: 1
First Page: 59 Last Page: 63
PubMed Id: 20179805
Publisher Id: conc17-1-59
|Capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity: case report and review of the literature|
|C. Ang, MD*|
|M. Kornbluth, MD?|
|M.P. Thirlwell, MD*|
|R.D. Rajan, MD*|
*Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC
? Department of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC
|Correspondence: Corresponding author: Raghu Rajan, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room A7-130, Medical Oncology, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4., E-mail:
A 75-year-old man with known hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia was diagnosed with a stage IIIB rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma in July 2007. He underwent a lower anterior resection, and 12 cycles of modified FOLFOX-6 [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 400 mg/m2 bolus, and leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m2, followed by 5FU 2.4 g/m2 by continuous infusion over 46 hours] adjuvant chemotherapy were planned.
Following chemotherapy cycle 7 in late January 2008, the patient developed atrial fibrillation, and he was admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) at the Montreal General Hospital. At that time, echocardiography revealed an ejection fraction of 55%?60%, mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and mild mitral regurgitation, with otherwise normal readings. He was converted to sinus rhythm on oral sotalol (80 mg twice daily), with the plan to initiate anticoagulation upon completion of chemotherapy. One week post discharge, he developed an upper extremity deep venous thrombosis on the side of his implanted catheter, and he was started on dalteparin. Two weeks later, his chemotherapy was changed to capecitabine monotherapy at 1500 mg/m2 twice daily.
About 6 days after starting capecitabine, the patient had a syncopal episode lasting approximately 2 minutes. He recovered spontaneously and, after some transient disorientation, returned to his baseline mental status. A few hours later, he experienced two presyncopal episodes accompanied by flushing and dizziness. He went to the emergency department, where he was found to have bradycardia at 54 bpm, although he was hemodynamically stable with a blood pressure of 140/79 mmHg. Initial blood work did not reveal any electrolyte abnormalities or tropinemia. An electrocardiogram demonstrated sinus bradycardia (Figure 1).
While on telemetry, the patient had a witnessed episode of presyncope associated with a pulse of 30?40 bpm and systolic pressure between 160? 170 mmHg. With the exception of sotalol, he received the evening doses of all of his other medications (capecitabine, metformin, venlafaxine, and valsartan) and was kept in the emergency department overnight for monitoring. Approximately 6 hours later, he had a sinus arrest of 15 s, from which he spontaneously recovered (Figure 2). Transcutaneous pacemaker pads were placed, and he was transferred to the CCU with atropine at the bedside. All medications were subsequently held.
The rest of the night was uneventful, but the following morning he had recurrent episodes of symptomatic bradycardia followed by another sinus arrest lasting 10 s. A transvenous pacemaker was inserted followed by a permanent pacemaker a few days later. Sotalol was resumed, and he was discharged without any further complications. He remains in clinical remission from his malignancy, and no further chemotherapy is planned.
Coronary vasospasm resulting in angina and even myocardial infarction is a well-known adverse effect of 5FU. Although cardiotoxicity is often reversible with discontinuation of 5FU and application of supportive care 1, the condition has the potential to be fatal. Reported overall mortality rates range from 2.2% to as high as 13.3% 2. The incidence of 5FU-induced cardiotoxicity in the literature ranges from 1.2% to 18%, although its true incidence may actually be higher, given that silent, reversible ST segment deviations on electrocardiography are known to occur 3,4. Other manifestations of 5FU-induced cardiotoxicity include heart failure, hyper- or hypotension, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, and cardiac arrest 5. However, these latter cardiac adverse events have been reported much less frequently.
Capecitabine is an oral prodrug that is converted to 5FU in a sequential 3-step enzymatic reaction that occurs primarily in the liver and in tumour cells. It has gained popularity because of its efficacy, ease of administration, and milder toxicity profile as compared with 5FU6. However, as the use of capecitabine becomes more widespread, the rare but significant cardiotoxic potential of the drug is beginning to surface. In a retrospective analysis performed on studies of patients undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic breast and colon cancer, the incidence of cardiotoxicity with capecitabine was found to be comparable to that of 5FU?LV7. Wijesinghe et al.8 reported an acute coronary syndrome in a patient with no history of cardiovascular disease who had been on capecitabine for only 2 days. Kosmas et al.5 documented myocardial infarction, electrocardiographic abnormalities, and ventricular extrasystoles in patients on capecitabine. Furthermore, Goldsmith et al.9 recently reported exercise-induced global myocardial ischemia with an ejection fraction of 36% in a patient with normal coronary arteries and resting left ventricular function who was on capecitabine for recurrent breast cancer.
We present the first reported case of a patient who ultimately required a permanent pacemaker after developing symptomatic bradycardia followed by sinus arrest while on capecitabine. Although the patient was taking sotalol, which can itself cause bradycardia and asystole, the sotalol had been started a month before the relevant episode, during which time the patient did not experience any of the noted complications. Given that capecitabine was started less than a week before presentation, it would appear to be the most likely culprit in the absence of other medication changes at the time.
The clinical manifestations of 5FU cardiotoxicity are frequently attributed to coronary vasospasm. However, anti-vasospastic agents including nitroglycerin and calcium channel blockers have not been consistently effective at relieving symptoms of angina in affected patients 1,5,10. In a study by Freeman et al.11, ergonovine challenge followed by 5FU infusion did not produce coronary vasospasm in a patient who had developed severe chest pain and ischemic electrocardiographic changes. In vivo studies in animal models have also provided evidence suggesting that mechanisms aside from coronary vasospasm may be responsible. Tsibiribi et al.12 subjected rabbits to either bolus or infusional 5FU. Rabbits that received the bolus suffered massive hemorrhagic myocardial infarcts with evidence of proximal coronary vasospasm. In contrast, animals in the infusion group demonstrated histologic changes consistent with toxic myocarditis. In addition, echocardiographic studies in patients with 5FU cardiotoxicity have revealed decreased ejection fraction and significant global or regional left ventricular dysfunction consistent with a cardiomyopathic picture 13,14.
The metabolites of 5FU have been implicated in mediating cardiac damage, in particular fluoroacetate (FAC), which is known to be directly myocardiotoxic 15. Fluoroacetate is converted into an inhibitor of citrate metabolism 16 and interestingly, intramyocardial citrate accumulation has been found in guinea pig recipients of 5FU17. A report by de Forni et al.18 also noted a trend toward increased urinary excretion of FAC during 5FU administration in 14 patients, including 6 who developed cardiotoxicity, although there was no strict temporal relationship with symptom onset. Other hypothesized mechanisms that are undergoing further investigation include the possibility of an autoimmune reaction, endothelial damage, and a procoagulable effect of 5FU19,20.
The route of administration, the dose intensity, and the schedule of 5FU also appear to influence the development of cardiotoxicity. In studies by Jensen et al.2 and Kosmas et al.5, a higher frequency of symptoms was recorded with continuous 5FU infusions (24 hours) than with shorter (<3 hours) infusions. Given that the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine mimic a continuous 5FU infusion, it is not surprising that the frequency of cardiac symptoms noted with capecitabine is similar to that with the 24-hour infusion 5. Higher doses of 5FU were associated with earlier symptom onset, and a weak trend toward longer symptom duration with capecitabine than with intravenous 5FU was also observed 2.
Drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics should also be considered to be additional factors that may predispose patients to developing cardiotoxicity with capecitabine. Lethal gastrointestinal toxicities have been reported with capecitabine, which have been attributed to a deficiency of dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD), the first enzymatic step in 5FU catabolism 21. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) is a critical enzyme for the activation of capecitabine in hepatocytes and tumour cells. Excessive levels of CDA resulting in overmetabolism of capecitabine into 5FU could explain the development of severe toxicities even in patients who are not DPD-deficient 22. Interestingly, geographic differences in tolerance to capecitabine have been documented, with the highest rates of toxicity occurring in American patients and the lowest in East Asian patients 23. Although cultural and dietary differences, in addition to regional variations in the reporting of toxicities, may have contributed to these observations, polymorphisms in the genes responsible for 5FU and capecitabine metabolism may have been a factor as well 23.
The patient presented here received capecitabine after experiencing a cardiac event (atrial fibrillation) while on 5FU. It is unclear whether his atrial fibrillation was a result of exposure to 5FU. Although the patient had risk factors for coronary artery disease, he never exhibited clinical, electrocardiographic, or laboratory abnormalities to suggest that ischemia contributed to his conduction abnormalities. Nevertheless, this case raises several important issues, the first of which is how one might identify patients who may be at risk of developing cardiotoxicity on 5FU. In some studies, a history of heart disease was a risk factor for experiencing a higher incidence and grade of cardiotoxicity 2,24,25. Conversely, Tsibiribi et al. reported symptoms of cardiotoxicity in 16 patients with no prior cardiac history 26. Other risk factors include advanced age, renal insufficiency 2, and mediastinal irradiation (which induces coronary artery intraluminal hyperplasia and collagen deposition 27). In view of what is being learned about the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and 5FU, the measurement of key enzymes such as DPD and CDA might eventually become important in helping to predict?and hopefully spare patients from?severe toxicities resulting from these drugs.
Another issue relates to monitoring while on therapy, with the goal of detecting preclinical markers of toxicity. Holubec et al.28 recently evaluated the utility of measuring brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin I (TnI) in patients receiving 5FU-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. In that study, 57% of patients were found to have laboratory evidence of ischemia and heart failure. Upon questioning, patients recalled transient symptoms of angina, dyspnea, and edema, although the timing of biomarker elevation and symptom onset was not precisely defined. Given the high incidence of cardiotoxicity that was observed, the authors proposed that all patients for whom 5FU chemotherapy is planned should undergo baseline electrocardiographic screening or, in those with prior cardiac history, echocardiography. They also suggested that TnI and BNP be monitored throughout the course of chemotherapy as surrogate markers of cardiotoxicity.
Finally, there is the question of rechallenging and giving prophylaxis to patients who have experienced cardiotoxicity but who nevertheless stand to benefit from 5FU. Cianci et al.29 successfully re-administered 5FU to 3 patients who developed symptoms of angina during the initial infusion? albeit using reduced doses administered together with prophylactic trans-epidermal nitroglycerin. In another case series of 6 patients who developed transient asymptomatic bradycardia on infusional 5FU, 4 patients were able to continue treatment, but 2 had to change their regimen because of persistent and recurring bradycardia with subsequent cycles 30. Patients in series reporting more severe cardiotoxicity, such as myocardial infarction, were not rechallenged 7,31. In such patients, for whom a rechallenge of 5FU or capecitabine seems too risky, raltitrexed appears to be a viable substitute 25.
In summary, cardiotoxicity induced by 5FU or capecitabine has multiple manifestations and may occur more frequently than previously reported. Although this cardiotoxicity is transient and often reversible, it has the potential to cause serious morbidity and even mortality. There are currently no published guidelines for screening, monitoring, and prophylaxis. Decisions with respect to managing and rechallenging patients who have developed cardiotoxicity on 5FU must be made on an individual basis. Oncologists and cardiologists alike must maintain a heightened awareness of the possibility of this phenomenon and collaborate closely to ensure patient safety.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
|1.||Robben NC,Pippas AW,Moore JO. The syndrome of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: an elusive cardiopathyCancerYear: 1993714935098422644|
|2.||Jensen SA,Sorensen JB. Risk factors and prevention of cardiotoxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil or capecitabineCancer Chemother PharmacolYear: 2006584879316418875|
|3.||Akhtar SS,Salim KP,Bano ZA. Symptomatic cardiotoxicity with high-dose 5-fluorouracil infusion: a prospective studyOncologyYear: 19935044148233284|
|4.||Wacker A,Lersch C,Scherpinski U,Reindl L,Seyfarth M. High incidence of angina pectoris in patients treated with 5-flurouracil. A planned surveillance study with 102 patientsOncologyYear: 2003651081212931015|
|5.||Kosmas C,Kallistratos MS,Kopterides P,et al. Cardiotoxicity of fluoropyrimidines in different schedules of administration: a prospective studyJ Cancer Res Clin OncolYear: 2008134758217636329|
|6.||Walko CM,Lindley C. Capecitabine: a reviewClin TherYear: 200527234415763604|
|7.||Van Cutsem E,Hoff PM,Blum JL,Abt M,Osterwalder B. Incidence of cardiotoxicity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is typical of that reported with 5-fluorouracilAnn OncolYear: 200213484511996484|
|8.||Wijesinghe N,Thompson PI,McAlister H. Acute coronary syndrome induced by capecitabine therapyHeart Lung CircYear: 200615337916697705|
|9.||Goldsmith YB,Roitacher N,Baum MS. Capecitabine-induced coronary vasospasmJ Clin OncolYear: 2008173802418669470|
|10.||Eskilsson J,Albertsson M. Failure of preventing 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity by prophylactic treatment with verapamilActa OncolYear: 199029100132278719|
|11.||Freeman NJ,Constanza ME. 5-Fluorouracil cardiotoxicityCancerYear: 19986136453275485|
|12.||Tsibiribi P,Bui?Xuan C,Bui?Xuan B,et al. Cardiac lesions induced by 5-fluorouracil in the rabbitHum Exp ToxicolYear: 200625305916866187|
|13.||Jakubowski AA,Kemeny N. Hypotension as a manifestation of cardiotoxicity in three patients receiving cisplatin and 5-fluorouracilCancerYear: 19886226693383127|
|14.||Patel B,Kloner RA,Ensley J,Al-Sarraf M,Kish J,Wynne J. 5-Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: left ventricular dysfunction and effect of coronary vasodilatorsAm J Med SciYear: 1987294238433661619|
|15.||Lemaire L,Malet?Martino MC,de Forni M,Martino R,Lasserre B. Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil vials stems from alkaline hydrolysis of this drugBr J CancerYear: 199266119271637660|
|16.||Mukherjee KL,Heidelberger C. Studies on fluorinated pyrimidines ix?the degradation of 5-fluorouracilJ Biol ChemYear: 1960235433714425080|
|17.||Matsubara I,Kamiya J,Imai S. Cardiotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil in the guinea pigJap J PharmacolYear: 19803087197241861|
|18.||de Forni M,Malet?Martino MC,Jaillais P,et al. Cardiotoxicity of high-dose continuous infusion fluorouracil: a prospective clinical studyJ Clin OncolYear: 19921017958011403060|
|19.||Kuzel T,Esparaz B,Green D,Kies M. Thrombogenicity of intravenous 5-fluorouracil alone or in combination with cisplatinCancerYear: 19906588592297659|
|20.||Alter P,Herzum M,Soufi M,Schaefer JR,Maisch B. Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracilCardiovasc Hematol Agents Med ChemYear: 200641516529545|
|21.||Ciccolini J,Mercier C,Dahan L,et al. Toxic death-case after capecitabine?oxaliplatin (xelox) administration: probable implication of dihydropyridine dehydrogenase deficiencyCancer Chemother PharmacolYear: 200658272516292536|
|22.||Mercier C,Dupuis C,Blesius A,et al. Early severe toxicities after capecitabine intake: possible implication of a cytidine deaminase extensive metabolizer profileCancer Chemother PharmacolYear: 20096311778019107485|
|23.||Haller DG,Cassidy J,Clark SJ,et al. Potential regional differences for the tolerability profiles of fluoropyrimidinesJ Clin OncolYear: 20082621182318445840|
|24.||Labianca R,Beretta G,Clerici M,Fraschini P,Luporini G. Cardiac toxicity of 5-fluorouracil: a study of 1083 patientsTumoriYear: 198268505107168016|
|25.||Ng M,Cunninham D,Norman AR. The frequency and pattern of cardiotoxicity observed with capecitabine used in conjunction with oxaliplatin in patients treated for advanced colorectal cancer (crc)Eur J CancerYear: 2005411542615978800|
|26.||Tsibiribi P,Descotes J,Lombard?Bohas C,et al. Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil in 1350 patients with no prior history of heart diseaseBull CancerYear: 200693E273016567310|
|27.||Galderisi M,Marra F,Esposito R,Lomoriello VS,Pardo M,de Divitiis O. Cancer therapy and cardiotoxicity: the need of serial Doppler echocardiographyCardiovasc UltrasoundYear: 20075417254324|
|28.||Holubec L Jr,Topolcan O,Finek J,et al. Dynamic monitoring of cardio-specific markers and markers of thyroid gland function in cancer patients?a pilot studyAnticancer ResYear: 2007271883617649788|
|29.||Cianci G,Morelli MF,Cannita K,et al. Prophylactic options in patients with 5-fluorouracil?associated cardiotoxicityBr J CancerYear: 2003881507912771913|
|30.||Talapatra K,Rajesh I,Rajesh B,Selvamani B,Subhashini J. Transient asymptomatic bradycardia in patients on infusional 5-fluorouracilJ Cancer Res TherYear: 200731697118079582|
|31.||Shoemaker LK,Arora U,Rocha Lima CM. 5fu-induced coronary vasospasmCancer ControlYear: 20041146914749623|
Keywords: 5-Fluorouracil, capecitabine, cardiotoxicity, chemotherapy.
Previous Document: Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in a 20-year-old patient.
Next Document: Primary epithelioid angiosarcoma of the breast masquerading as carcinoma.