Document Detail

Candidates for multiple frequency response characteristics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8747806     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
This study examined what types of subjects may benefit from the use of multiple memory hearing aids that offer variation in their frequency response characteristics. Thirty subjects with varied degrees and configurations of hearing loss compared an individually prescribed frequency response (NAL) and two variations in which the real-ear response slope was either increased (more high-frequency emphasis) or decreased by about 3 dB/octave over the range from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz. The evaluations consisted of paired comparison judgments of pleasantness and of ease of understanding speech, in quiet and in three background noises with substantially different acoustic spectra (traffic noise, speech babble, and high-frequency noise). Twelve of the 30 subjects selected different frequency responses for different background noises and/or for different response criteria. These subjects were characterized as having the more severe high-frequency hearing losses (averaged across 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz). They also tended to be those for whom the three frequency responses provided the greatest variation in real-ear low-frequency gain. (Despite substantial electronic variations, some subjects received only small variations in real-ear gain at the low frequencies). When subjects chose a different response for different conditions, they tended to prefer responses for which the slope was negatively related to the spectrum of the stimulus. This was true for both response criteria. The conclusion is that hearing aid users with substantial high-frequency losses, and who can be fitted with sufficient variation in the low-frequency real-ear gain, have the potential to benefit from having a choice of frequency response characteristics.
G Keidser; H Dillon; D Byrne
Related Documents :
680046 - Discharge patterns in the cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla following noise induced as...
3662936 - Effects of noise and hearing loss upon frequency discrimination.
2279196 - Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener.
20440116 - Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
7084426 - Effect of light at night on the pineal rhythm in n-acetyltransferase activity in the sy...
24006536 - Why aye-ayes see blue.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ear and hearing     Volume:  16     ISSN:  0196-0202     ISO Abbreviation:  Ear Hear     Publication Date:  1995 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-11-22     Completed Date:  1996-11-22     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8005585     Medline TA:  Ear Hear     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  562-74     Citation Subset:  IM    
National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, NSW Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Audiometry, Speech
Hearing Aids*
Middle Aged
Noise / adverse effects
Perceptual Masking
Rehabilitation of Hearing Impaired*
Speech Discrimination Tests
Speech Perception
Speech Reception Threshold Test

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users.
Next Document:  The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple mem...