Document Detail


Can we distinguish between infertility and subfertility when predicting natural conception in couples with an unfulfilled child wish?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23250923     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY QUESTION: Can mixture survival models help distinguish infertility from subfertility in couples with an unexplained unfulfilled child wish?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Mixture models estimated that 47% of the couples were infertile; female age and previous pregnancy were significantly related to infertility, whereas duration of child wish was associated with a longer time to pregnancy for subfertile couples.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: To differentiate between couples who require assisted conception and couples who still have good chances of natural, i.e. unassisted, conception, several prediction models of natural conception have been developed. Prognostic factors in these models are usually assessed by Cox proportional hazard models that cannot differentiate between couples with an unfulfilled child wish who are subfertile, i.e. have reduced ability to conceive naturally, and couples who are really infertile, i.e. are completely unable to conceive naturally. We evaluated whether a mixture survival model can make such a distinction.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Consecutive couples presenting at the fertility clinics of 38 centres in the Netherlands between January 2002 and February 2004 joined a prospective cohort study. Of the 7860 couples in the cohort, 3917 couples met our inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 219 days, with a maximum of 5 years.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: Couples had to present with an unexplained cause of an unfulfilled child wish. A mixture model was used to estimate the proportion of couples who were infertile and the time to pregnancy for the subfertile couples.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During the follow-up, 794 couples conceived naturally. The mixture model estimated that 47% [95% confidence interval (CI): 33-56%] of couples were infertile, despite the absence of objective factors indicating a cause for infertility. Of the evaluated prognostic factors, female age, duration of child wish, previous pregnancy, semen quality, BMI and cycle length, female age [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19] and previous pregnancy (0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.67) were significant predictors of infertility. Among subfertile couples, a longer duration of a child wish (FFR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.85) was a significant prognostic factor for time to pregnancy. In the Cox models, all variables except BMI were significant predictors of time to pregnancy.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The mixture model had limited power due to a low number of couples at the end of the follow-up period. Mixture model analyses on external, long-term follow-up data are necessary to validate our results.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Mixture models could be a useful tool in selecting couples who require assisted reproductive technology because the effects of prognostic factors can be subdivided into effects on the fraction of infertile couples and effects on the time to pregnancy for subfertile couples, which is not possible in conventional models.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by grant 945/12/002 from ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Authors:
N Van Geloven; F Van der Veen; P M M Bossuyt; P G Hompes; A H Zwinderman; B W Mol
Related Documents :
17518423 - Abnormal first-trimester ductus venosus blood flow: a risk factor for adverse outcome i...
24228013 - Maternal hypotension during fetoscopic surgery: incidence and its impact on fetal survi...
18795153 - Effects of maternal exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate during fetal and/or neonata...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-12-18
Journal Detail:
Title:  Human reproduction (Oxford, England)     Volume:  28     ISSN:  1460-2350     ISO Abbreviation:  Hum. Reprod.     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-14     Completed Date:  2013-08-23     Revised Date:  2013-11-06    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8701199     Medline TA:  Hum Reprod     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  658-65     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.vangeloven@amc.nl
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Cohort Studies
Family Characteristics*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Goals*
Humans
Infertility, Female / diagnosis*,  physiopathology,  psychology
Infertility, Male / diagnosis*,  physiopathology,  psychology
Male
Models, Biological
Netherlands
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Semen Analysis
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Time-to-Pregnancy

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  ?-Sitosterol oxidation products attenuate vasorelaxation by increasing reactive oxygen species and c...
Next Document:  A factor analysis approach to examining relationships among ovarian steroid concentrations, gonadotr...