Document Detail


Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19103946     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a moral reasoning exercise can improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities METHODS: A randomised internet survey focussing on patient age in healthcare allocation was repeated twice. From 2574 internet panel members from the USA and Canada, 2020 (79%) completed the baseline survey and 1247 (62%) completed the follow-up. We elicited respondent preferences for age via five allocation scenarios. In each scenario, a hypothetical health planner made a decision to fund one of two programmes identical except for average patient age (35 vs 65 years). Half of the respondents (intervention group) were randomly assigned to receive an additional moral reasoning exercise. Responses were elicited again 7 weeks later. Numerical scores ranging from -5 (strongest preference for younger patients) to +5 (strongest preference for older patients); 0 indicates no age preference. Response quality was assessed by propensity to choose extreme or neutral values, internal consistency, temporal stability and appeal to prejudicial factors. RESULTS: With the exception of a scenario offering palliative care, respondents preferred offering scarce resources to younger patients in all clinical contexts. This preference for younger patients was weaker in the intervention group. Indicators of response quality favoured the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Although people generally prefer allocating scarce resources to young patients over older ones, these preferences are significantly reduced when participants are encouraged to reflect carefully on a wide range of moral principles. A moral reasoning exercise is a promising strategy to improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities.
Authors:
M Johri; L J Damschroder; B J Zikmund-Fisher; S Y H Kim; P A Ubel
Related Documents :
15223886 - Why older australians participate in exercise and sport.
17646216 - Sit-to-stand as home exercise for mobility-limited adults over 80 years of age--grandst...
11387586 - Self-reported exercise before age 40: influence on quantitative skeletal ultrasound and...
16491686 - A field study of step-up exercises with touch for elderly people.
2859796 - Metabolic adaptations to exercise: a review of potential beta-adrenoceptor antagonist e...
17953446 - A comparison of sesquiterpene scaffolds across different populations of the tropical ma...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  35     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2009 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-23     Completed Date:  2009-04-06     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  57-64     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Health Administration, Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C3J7. mira.johri@umontreal.ca
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Canada
Decision Making / ethics*
Female
Health Care Rationing / ethics*
Health Care Surveys
Health Priorities / ethics*
Humans
Internet
Male
Public Opinion
Questionnaires
United States
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
R01-HD38963/HD/NICHD NIH HHS; R01-HD40789/HD/NICHD NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The fair innings argument and increasing life spans.
Next Document:  Understanding ethics guidelines using an internet-based expert system.