Document Detail


Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21558099     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether routine data produced by an electronic prescribing system might be useful in identifying doctors at higher risk of making a serious prescribing error.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prescribing by junior doctors over 12 months using an electronic prescribing information and communication system. The system issues a graded series of prescribing alerts (low-level, intermediate, and high-level), and warnings and prompts to respond to abnormal test results. These may be overridden or heeded, except for high-level prescribing alerts, which are indicative of a potentially serious error and impose a 'hard stop'.
SETTING: A large teaching hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: All junior doctors in the study setting.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of prescribing alerts and laboratory warnings and doctors' responses.
RESULTS: Altogether 848,678 completed prescriptions issued by 381 doctors (median 1538 prescriptions per doctor, interquartile range [IQR] 328-3275) were analysed. We identified 895,029 low-level alerts (median 1033 per 1000 prescriptions per doctor, IQR 903-1205) with a median of 34% (IQR 31-39%) heeded; 172,434 intermediate alerts (median 196 per 1000 prescriptions per doctor, IQR 159-266), with a median of 23% (IQR 16-30%) heeded; and 11,940 high-level 'hard stop' alerts. Doctors vary greatly in the extent to which they trigger and respond to alerts of different types. The rate of high-level alerts showed weak correlation with the rate of intermediate prescribing alerts (correlation coefficient, r = 0.40, P = <0.001); very weak correlation with low-level alerts (r = 0.12, P = 0.019); and showed weak (and sometimes negative) correlation with propensity to heed test-related warnings or alarms. The degree of correlation between generation of intermediate and high-level alerts is insufficient to identify doctors at high risk of making serious errors.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine data from an electronic prescribing system should not be used to identify doctors who are at risk of making serious errors. Careful evaluation of the kinds of quality assurance questions for which routine data are suitable will be increasingly valuable.
Authors:
Jamie J Coleman; Karla Hemming; Peter G Nightingale; Ian R Clark; Mary Dixon-Woods; Robin E Ferner; Richard J Lilford
Related Documents :
10351139 - Management of chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (itp) in adults.
19860699 - Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors: future perspectives.
21067689 - Perspectives on dance science rehabilitation understanding whole body mechanics and fou...
16882099 - Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter analgesics in the treatment of common cold and ...
9672729 - Medicine and the manic defence.
10573799 - Enuresis treatment in france.
14503149 - Stem revenue losses with effective cdm management.
20650499 - Summary of the aua guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children.
10351139 - Management of chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (itp) in adults.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine     Volume:  104     ISSN:  1758-1095     ISO Abbreviation:  J R Soc Med     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-05-11     Completed Date:  2011-07-14     Revised Date:  2011-07-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7802879     Medline TA:  J R Soc Med     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  208-18     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK. Jamie.coleman@uhb.nhs.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Algorithms
Drug Prescriptions / standards*
Electronic Prescribing / standards*
Female
Great Britain
Hospital Units
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Male
Medical Order Entry Systems* / standards
Medical Records Systems, Computerized / standards
Medical Staff, Hospital*
Medication Errors / prevention & control*
Physician's Practice Patterns / standards*
Retrospective Studies
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Work and common psychiatric disorders.
Next Document:  Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample.