Document Detail

Calcium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16625609     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Metabolic studies suggest calcium may have a role in the regulation of blood pressure. Some epidemiological studies have reported that people with a higher intake of calcium tend to have lower blood pressure. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reached conflicting conclusions about whether oral calcium supplementation can reduce blood pressure.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of oral calcium supplementation as a treatment for primary hypertension in adults.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, ISI Proceedings,, Current Controlled Trials, CAB abstracts, and reference lists of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in the review.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria were: 1) RCTs comparing oral calcium supplementation with placebo, no treatment, or usual care; 2) treatment and follow-up >/=8 weeks; 3) participants over 18 years old, with raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) >/=140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >/=85 mmHg; 4) SBP and DBP reported at end of follow-up. We excluded trials where: participants were pregnant; received antihypertensive medication which changed during the study; or calcium supplementation was combined with other interventions.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Random effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 RCTs (n=485), with between eight and 15 weeks follow-up. The results of the individual trials were heterogeneous. Combining all trials, participants receiving calcium supplementation as compared to control had a statistically significant reduction in SBP (mean difference: -2.5 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.5 to -0.6, I(2 )= 42%), but not DBP (mean difference: -0.8 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.1 to 0.4, I(2) = 48%). Sub-group analyses indicated that heterogeneity between trials could not be explained by dose of calcium or baseline blood pressure. Heterogeneity was reduced when poor quality trials were excluded. The one trial reporting adequate concealment of allocation and the one trial reporting adequate blinding yielded results consistent with the primary meta-analysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In view of the poor quality of included trials and the heterogeneity between trials, the evidence in favour of causal association between calcium supplementation and blood pressure reduction is weak and is probably due to bias. This is because poor quality studies generally tend to over-estimate the effects of treatment. Larger, longer duration and better quality double-blind placebo controlled trials are needed to assess the effect of calcium supplementation on blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes.
H O Dickinson; D J Nicolson; J V Cook; F Campbell; F R Beyer; G A Ford; J Mason
Related Documents :
15106799 - Haemodynamic responses to physical activity and body posture during everyday life.
8370239 - Neuropeptide y, noradrenaline and invasive haemodynamic data in mild to moderate chroni...
12446269 - Rhinitis is associated with increased systolic blood pressure in men: a population-base...
10421089 - Cardiovascular reactivity in zimbabwe.
15716689 - Bell or diaphragm in the measurement of blood pressure?
17223039 - Use of the median for the evaluation of blood pressure self-measurement (bpsm).
7032269 - Clonidine, a centrally acting sympathetic inhibitor, as monotherapy for mild to moderat...
3366679 - High-frequency jet ventilation in a neonatal foal.
15687869 - White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2006-04-19
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2006  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-04-20     Completed Date:  2006-06-15     Revised Date:  2013-06-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD004639     Citation Subset:  IM    
University of Newcastle, National Guideline Research & Development Unit, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK, NE2 4AA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Calcium, Dietary / therapeutic use*
Dietary Supplements*
Hypertension / therapy*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Calcium, Dietary

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Speed enforcement detection devices for preventing road traffic injuries.
Next Document:  Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant reci...