| Calcium scoring in unenhanced and enhanced CT data of the aorta-iliacal arteries: impact of image acquisition, reconstruction, and analysis parameter settings. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21969704 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BackgroundSeveral studies have been published on the matter of abdominal aortic and iliac calcifications and the association to clinical entities such as diabetes mellitus and renal failure. However, comparing of these studies is questionable since quantification methods for atherosclerosis differ.PurposeTo evaluate the effect of image acquisition settings, reconstruction parameters, and analysis methods on calcium quantification in the abdominal aorta.Material and MethodsCalcium scores were retrospectively determined on standardized abdominal CT scans of 15 patients. Two researchers obtained calcium scores with 10 different lower thresholds (LT) (130, 145, 160, 175, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 1000) in CT scans with and without contrast enhancement, with slice thicknesses (ST) varying between 2.0-5.0 mm for the non-contrast-enhanced series and between 1.0-5.0 mm for the contrast-enhanced series. In addition calcium scores obtained with two convolution kernels (B10f, B20f) were compared. Inter-observer variability was calculated.ResultsCalcium scoring at higher STs is overestimated compared to smaller STs and this effect was more pronounced with increasing calcium loads. Concerning the convolution kernel, scores obtained with kernel B10f were overestimated compared to kernel B20f. Increase of LT resulted in a decrease of the calcium score and scoring in contrast-enhanced series resulted in higher scores compared to non-contrast-enhanced series. These effects are more apparent in patients with higher calcium loads. Calcium scoring reproducibility with the reference standard is limited for the aorta-iliac trajectory, whereas scoring with the remaining settings is reproducible.ConclusionScores obtained with different settings cannot be compared. The inter-observer reproducibility was limited using the reference standard and practical difficulties were substantial. Scoring with higher LT, ST, and contrast enhancement is faster and has less practical difficulties. |
| | |
Authors:
|
N Komen; P Klitsie; Jj Hermans; Wj Niessen; Gj Kleinrensink; J Jeekel; Jf Lange |
Related Documents
:
|
11930074 - Mr colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. 7257854 - Perceptibility of experimental and clinical lesions in the ct image with and without im... 7393164 - An evaluation of hgi2 detectors for x-ray computed tomography. 10997064 - Minimising radiation dose to the lens in axial computed tomography of the temporal. 15978884 - Spectrum of angiographic findings in aortoarteritis. 21633054 - Apparent diffusion coefficient as an mr imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma ... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-10-3 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) Volume: - ISSN: 1600-0455 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-10-4 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8706123 Medline TA: Acta Radiol Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: In-vivo near-infrared optical imaging of growing osteosarcoma cell lesions xenografted in mice: dual...
Next Document: Visual and quantitative assessment of lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with magnetic resonance i...