Document Detail

The CRTC1-SIK1 pathway regulates entrainment of the circadian clock.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23993098     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Retinal photoreceptors entrain the circadian system to the solar day. This photic resetting involves cAMP response element binding protein (CREB)-mediated upregulation of Per genes within individual cells of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Our detailed understanding of this pathway is poor, and it remains unclear why entrainment to a new time zone takes several days. By analyzing the light-regulated transcriptome of the SCN, we have identified a key role for salt inducible kinase 1 (SIK1) and CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (CRTC1) in clock re-setting. An entrainment stimulus causes CRTC1 to coactivate CREB, inducing the expression of Per1 and Sik1. SIK1 then inhibits further shifts of the clock by phosphorylation and deactivation of CRTC1. Knockdown of Sik1 within the SCN results in increased behavioral phase shifts and rapid re-entrainment following experimental jet lag. Thus SIK1 provides negative feedback, acting to suppress the effects of light on the clock. This pathway provides a potential target for the regulation of circadian rhythms.
Authors:
Aarti Jagannath; Rachel Butler; Sofia I H Godinho; Yvonne Couch; Laurence A Brown; Sridhar R Vasudevan; Kevin C Flanagan; Daniel Anthony; Grant C Churchill; Matthew J A Wood; Guido Steiner; Martin Ebeling; Markus Hossbach; Joseph G Wettstein; Giles E Duffield; Silvia Gatti; Mark W Hankins; Russell G Foster; Stuart N Peirson
Related Documents :
856318 - Neural repetitive firing: modifications of the hodgkin-huxley axon suggested by experim...
21605588 - Simultaneous adaptation to non-collinear retinal motion and smooth pursuit eye movement.
9212248 - Regularity of firing of neurons in the inferior colliculus.
25096128 - Acoustically invisible feeding blue whales in northern icelandic waters.
9536378 - Spatial frequency discrimination: visual long-term memory or criterion setting?
19254728 - Signal processing through a generalized module of adaptation and spatial sensing.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cell     Volume:  154     ISSN:  1097-4172     ISO Abbreviation:  Cell     Publication Date:  2013 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-09-02     Completed Date:  2013-11-15     Revised Date:  2014-06-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0413066     Medline TA:  Cell     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1100-11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Active Transport, Cell Nucleus
Animals
Circadian Clocks*
Circadian Rhythm
Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein / metabolism
Gene Knockdown Techniques
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases / genetics,  metabolism*
RNA, Small Interfering / metabolism
Rod Opsins / genetics,  metabolism
Signal Transduction*
Suprachiasmatic Nucleus / metabolism
Transcription Factors / metabolism
Transcription, Genetic
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
090684/Z/09/Z//Wellcome Trust; G-0503//Parkinson's UK; G-1109//Parkinson's UK; G0900887//Medical Research Council; R01 GM087508/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS; R01-GM087508//Wellcome Trust
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Crtc1 protein, mouse; 0/Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; 0/RNA, Small Interfering; 0/Rod Opsins; 0/Transcription Factors; 0/melanopsin; EC 2.7.11.1/Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases; EC 2.7.11.1/Sik1 protein, mouse
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Cell
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Cell
ISSN: 0092-8674
ISSN: 1097-4172
Publisher: Cell Press
Article Information
© 2013 ELL & Excerpta Medica.
License:
Received Day: 8 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Revision Received Day: 24 Month: 5 Year: 2013
Accepted Day: 29 Month: 7 Year: 2013
pmc-release publication date: Day: 29 Month: 8 Year: 2013
Print publication date: Day: 29 Month: 8 Year: 2013
Volume: 154 Issue: 5
First Page: 1100 Last Page: 1111
PubMed Id: 23993098
ID: 3898689
Publisher Id: S0092-8674(13)00961-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.004

The CRTC1-SIK1 Pathway Regulates Entrainment of the Circadian Clock
Aarti Jagannath157
Rachel Butler157
Sofia I.H. Godinho15
Yvonne Couch2
Laurence A. Brown1
Sridhar R. Vasudevan2
Kevin C. Flanagan3
Daniel Anthony2
Grant C. Churchill2
Matthew J.A. Wood4
Guido Steiner5
Martin Ebeling5
Markus Hossbach6
Joseph G. Wettstein5
Giles E. Duffield3
Silvia Gatti5
Mark W. Hankins1
Russell G. Foster1 Email: russell.foster@eye.ox.ac.uk
Stuart N. Peirson1∗∗ Email: stuart.peirson@eye.ox.ac.uk
1Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology), University of Oxford, Levels 5-6 West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
2Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK
3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Galvin Life Sciences Center, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
4Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK
5pRED Pharma Research and Development F. Hoffmann-La Roche, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
6Axolabs GmbH Fritz-Hornschuch-Straße 9, 95326 Kulmbach, Germany
Corresponding author russell.foster@eye.ox.ac.uk
∗∗Corresponding author stuart.peirson@eye.ox.ac.uk
7These authors contributed equally to this work

Introduction

There has been remarkable progress in our understanding of the complex intracellular mechanisms that generate and regulate circadian rhythms across multiple species. In mammals, the molecular clock arises from a transcriptional translational-feedback loop, consisting of the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 that drive the expression of their regulators, PERIOD and CRYPTOCHROME (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). These elements form part of an autoregulatory-feedback loop, the period of which is approximately 24 hr. Most cells of the body appear to possess such a molecular oscillator (Albrecht, 2012; Balsalobre et al., 1998), and these autonomous clocks are synchronized to each other and the external environment primarily by a circadian pacemaker within the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) (Ralph et al., 1990). The SCN is in-turn aligned (entrained) to the solar day by exposure to light at dawn and dusk, detected by photoreceptors located exclusively within the retina of the eye. Photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (pRGCs), utilizing the photopigment melanopsin (OPN4), provide the primary light input to the SCN, exemplified by the fact that mice or human subjects lacking all their rods and cones still possess a full cohort of circadian responses to light (Freedman et al., 1999; Zaidi et al., 2007). Although rod and cone photoreceptors are not required for entrainment, they can partially compensate for the loss of melanopsin in Opn4−/− mice (Hattar et al., 2003). In addition, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that rods, and the different classes of cone photoreceptor, can complement the role of the pRGCs in circadian entrainment by expanding the irradiance range of the response and in the detection of light transitions (Lall et al., 2010; van Oosterhout et al., 2012).

There remains, however, only a very basic understanding of the molecular mechanisms whereby cellular oscillators within the SCN are entrained to environmental light. This can be summarized as follows: light activation of pRGCs causes the release of the neurotransmitters glutamate and PACAP (Hannibal et al., 2000) at the terminals of the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) that projects directly to the SCN. Neurotransmitter release results in a Ca2+ influx, which activates “phosphorelay” signaling pathways. A number of different kinases have been implicated in these pathways, including PKA, PKG, CaMK, and MAPK, although their relative roles remain unclear (Meijer and Schwartz, 2003). All these pathways are thought to converge on the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), which is activated by phosphorylation at Ser133 (Ginty et al., 1993) and Ser142 (Gau et al., 2002). Phosphorylated CREB then binds to cAMP response elements (CRE) in the promoters of light-regulated genes. The promoters of many previously identified light-responsive genes in the SCN including Fos, Nr4a1, Egr1, Egr3 (Lin et al., 1997; Morris et al., 1998; Porterfield et al., 2007), the MAP kinase phosphatase Dusp1 (Doi et al., 2007), and miRNAs miR-132 and miR-217 (Cheng et al., 2007) all contain a highly conserved CRE. Significantly, the clock genes Per1 and Per2 also contain conserved CREs, which mediate their light induction (Albrecht et al., 1997; Schwartz et al., 2011). Elevated PER1 and PER2 adjust the molecular-feedback loop of the circadian oscillator to the light/dark (LD) cycle.

This linear description of light-induced Per gene induction cannot explain a key feature of light-regulated circadian behavior. Namely, that circadian entrainment is slow, taking multiple days to adjust to an advanced or delayed LD cycle. In most mammals, including jet-lagged humans, behavioral shifts are limited to approximately 1 hr (one time zone) per day (Aschoff, 1981). Furthermore, at a molecular level, the effect of light on Per gene induction is limited. For example, under extended illumination, Per1 mRNA light-induction peaks after ∼1 hr and then returns to baseline (Vitaterna et al., 2006), indicating CREB transcription is arrested one hour after it is induced. Mirroring this molecular response, high-irradiance light pulses greater than 1 hr cease to have a phase-shifting effect upon the murine clock. This saturation of the response suggests the presence of an unidentified negative-feedback mechanism that effectively limits the magnitude of phase-shifting responses to light within the SCN. Thus, entrainment is a gradual process requiring repeated shifting stimuli over multiple days. Our aims in this study were to understand the molecular mechanisms that limit the effects of entrainment stimuli on the clock.

Here, we show both in vitro (via serum shock) and in vivo (via light) that an entraining stimulus causes CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (CRTC1) to coactivate CREB, inducing the expression of both Per1 and Sik1. SIK1 then inhibits further expression of Per1 by phosphorylation of and deactivation of CRTC1. Critically, we show that knockdown of Sik1 within the SCN results in extended light-induced phase shifts and an enhanced rate of re-entrainment to an advanced LD cycle. As SIK1 acts to suppress the effects of light on the clock, this pathway provides a pharmacological target for the treatment of disturbed circadian rhythms, including jet lag, shift-work, and illnesses that disturb circadian timing.


Results
Nocturnal Light Regulates the Expression of 536 Transcripts in the SCN

In order to identify signaling pathways involved in photic input, we examined the light-regulated transcriptome of the wild-type (Opn4+/+) SCN across a period of nocturnal light exposure. We collected SCN from mice that received a nocturnal light pulse delivered 4 hr after activity onset (circadian time/CT16) over a 2 hr time course and identified 536 genes as light-regulated in the wild-type SCN using Affymetrix whole-genome mouse exon arrays (Figure 1A and Figure S1 and Table S1 available online). Surprisingly, the majority (81%, 436 genes) of transcripts were downregulated in response to light, with a smaller number of genes showing upregulation (19%, 100 genes). These included the acutely upregulated immediate early genes (IEGs) previously shown to respond to light in the SCN, including Fos (Lupi et al., 2006), Nr4a1, and Egr1 (Porterfield et al., 2007), clock genes (Per1), and clock-controlled genes (Rorb). In addition, we confirmed Rrad (Porterfield et al., 2007), a GTPase modulating calcium-binding proteins such as CAMKII, which has an identified role in photic resetting (Fukushima et al., 1997) and Dusp1, a MAP kinase phosphatase, characterized as light-induced and clock-controlled in the SCN (Doi et al., 2007).

Among the genes we identified were Dusp4 and Sik1, which were found to cluster with Per1 (Figure 1A). Sik1 encodes salt inducible kinase 1, a Ser/Thr protein kinase of the AMP-dependent protein kinases (AMPK) family of which AMPK rhythmically phosphorylates Cry1 (Lamia et al., 2009) and Dusp4 encodes a dual Ser/Thr and Tyr phosphatase selectively controlling ERK (Cagnol and Rivard, 2013). The downregulated transcripts include Tac1, which encodes substance P precursor, known to have a role in phase shifting (Kim et al., 2001); Sim1, a transcription factor of the bHLH-PAS family that also includes Clock; Plekho1, which shows homology with casein kinase and a number of receptors including the serotonin receptor Htr7; Lactrophilin (Lphn3); and the glycine receptors Glra1 and Glra2.

To gain insight into the pathways represented by these transcripts, we performed a gene-enrichment analysis based on gene ontology (GO) terms (Figure 1B). One category of interest that is significantly responsive to light includes a number of transcripts relating to synaptic remodeling and plasticity, which were upregulated at a late stage, and included Raspgrp1, Grit, and Ntng1.

A number of previous studies have highlighted the central role of CREB in phase shifting (Gau et al., 2002; Ginty et al., 1993) and the promoters of many previously identified light-responsive genes in the SCN including Fos, Per1, Nr4a1, and Dusp1 contain conserved CREs (Porterfield et al., 2007; Travnickova-Bendova et al., 2002). We overlaid our data with those of Zhang et al. (2005) to identify transcripts containing CRE sites in their promoters. We found that of the genes upregulated more than 1.5-fold, there was significant enrichment of those containing CRE sites near the TATA box (Figure 1C). This correlation implies that CREB drives the high-magnitude gene induction that underlies phase-shifting responses in the SCN. We provide a detailed characterization of CREB target genes that are induced by light in the SCN (Table S2). Analysis of individual clusters of the Opn4+/+ SCN light-induced transcriptome showed that in addition to CREB, binding sites for SP1 and KROX (in transcripts upregulated at 120 min) and TAL1, HNFalpha3, and WT1 (transcripts showing early repression followed by upregulation) were enriched.

To identify any genes from our screen that could play a direct role in the core circadian oscillator, we reviewed data obtained from bioluminescent recordings from a genome-wide RNAi screen on Per2-luc transfected U2OS cells (Zhang et al., 2009). Silencing of several of the genes caused significant changes in period length, which would indicate a role in regulating phase delays of the clock (Pendergast et al., 2010). Of particular interest were two kinases that caused period lengthening. Csnk2a1 (period = 31.2 hr versus 25.2 for control), which is downregulated by light, is a serine threonine kinase. It is closely related to CsnkE, which is mutated in the Tau mutant hamster, which also shows period lengthening (Lowrey et al., 2000). Silencing of Sik1, which is upregulated by light in the SCN, in a manner similar to Per1 (Figure 1A) also shows period lengthening (28.0 hr).

Opn4−/− Mice Show Attenuated Transcriptional Responses to Light in the SCN

Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells provide the major retinal projection to the SCN (Güler et al., 2008). The endogenous light sensitivity of these cells conferred by melanopsin (OPN4) is important for circadian entrainment. Mice lacking melanopsin (Opn4−/−) show attenuated phase-shifting responses to light, which correlate with attenuated induction of Fos and Per1 in the SCN (Lupi et al., 2006; Ruby et al., 2002). We compared SCN samples from Opn4−/− mice with the data from wild-type animals (Opn4+/+); 92% of the genes that were upregulated in response to light in the wild-type showed an attenuated light-regulated pattern of expression in the Opn4−/− SCN (Figures S2A and S2B). We verified the attenuated induction of Fos, Per1, and Egr1 (Figure S2C) in the Opn4−/− SCN using qPCR. Analysis of transcription factor binding site (TFBS) showed that those transcripts with the greatest attenuation in Opn4−/−mice, including Fos, Nr4a1 and Per1, were enriched for WT1, a repressor of Egr1 (Tables S3 and S4). Our results indicate that in Opn4−/− mice, transcriptional responses in the SCN are broadly attenuated, mirroring the attenuated Fos induction and circadian responses to light previously observed. These results suggest that in the absence of melanopsin, there is an overall reduction in signal amplitude reaching the SCN via the RHT.

Identification of SIK1 as a Potential Repressor of Phase-Shifting Responses

As CREB transcription plays a critical role in photic entrainment (Ginty et al., 1993), and because SIK1 acts both as a repressor of CREB transcription (Katoh et al., 2006) and as a target of CREB regulation itself, Sik1 emerged as a strong candidate for an inducible repressor acting as a brake on photic input to the SCN. SIK1 functions by phosphorylating and thereby deactivating the CREB coactivator CRTC (CREB-regulated transcription coactivator), which exists in three isoforms, CRTC1–3. These isoforms exhibit a tissue-specific expression pattern and the dual requirement for CREB phosphorylation and the presence of CRTC provides the complexity and specificity required in the response to cAMP signaling. Indeed, the SIK/CRTC pathway can regulate CREB transcription in other cellular systems (Berdeaux et al., 2007; Kanyo et al., 2009). In these cases, Ca2+ and cAMP signaling triggers calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of CRTC (Altarejos and Montminy 2011; Screaton et al., 2004), and its nuclear translocation (Ch’ng et al., 2012). CRTC in turn stimulates CREB transcription of genes containing CRE, including Sik1. The resulting induction of SIK1 represses CREB transcription through the phosphorylation of CRTC. In such a manner, SIK1 could provide negative feedback on photic input to the SCN by inhibiting the light-induced, CREB-mediated expression of Per1.

To test this hypothesis, we investigated the function of the CRTC-SIK1 pathway in regulating the circadian clock. To this end, we studied the nuclear translocation of CRTC1; the resultant CREB-mediated Sik1 and Per1 induction; and the effect of SIK1 on the transcription of Per1 and on re-entrainment in both cellular clock models and the intact animal.

The CRTC-SIK1 Cascade Regulates CREB-Mediated Transcription in Phase Shifting In Vitro

In order to test the effects of SIK1 inhibition on the molecular oscillator, we used the immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line NIH 3T3 as an in vitro model of the circadian clock. These cells can be phase shifted using serum stimulation (Balsalobre et al., 1998). We found that CRTC1 translocated to the nucleus following a serum shock (Figure 2A) and Sik1, which contains a conserved CRE/ATF (Figure 2B top) was induced (Figure 2B bottom). Increased levels of CRTC phosphorylation measured in cell lysates collected before and after serum shock, were observed as a consequence of Sik1 induction (Figure 2C). In order to specifically inhibit SIK1 activity, we used a gene-specific RNAi-based approach (Figures 2D and S3A–S3D and Table 1). Lysates of Sik1 knockdown cells showed no increase in CRTC phosphorylation after serum shock (Figure S3E). Cells transfected with siRNA against Sik1 (siSik1) showed severely attenuated induction of Sik1 resulting from serum treatment (Figure 2D and Table 1) with no significant change over time. To test the proposed role of Sik1 and Crtc in phase shifting of the clock, Per1 induction was assayed following silencing of Sik1 and Crtc isoforms expressed in NIH 3T3 cells (Crtc1 and Crtc3, Figure S3B). Significant changes of Per1 levels over the duration of the experiment were apparent after treatment with nontargeting control (siNT) and siSik1 (Figure 2E and Table 1). However, knockdown of Sik1 resulted in an increase in the duration and levels of Per1 induction as measured by a significant increase in the area under the curve for Sik1 (Figure 2G, Tables 1 and 2). In order to test that SIK1 acts via CRTC to attenuate CREB-mediated transcription of Per1, we assessed the effect of cosilencing Crtc1 and Crtc3 (siCrtc) on serum-shock-induced Per1 expression. Knockdown of Crtc attenuated the induction of Per1 (Figures 2F and 2G, Tables 1 and 2) with no significant difference over time after serum treatment. This result supports the proposed model whereby the effects of SIK1 are mediated through CRTC. Crucially, this result also demonstrates that CRTC is an important CREB coactivator required in the phase-shifting response. Circadian expression of Per1 is regulated by multiple promoters, including the E box; therefore, we confirmed this requirement for CRTC in the phase-shifting response by examining the induction of two other light/serum-responsive genes (Egr1 and Nr4a1) that contain CREs in their promoters (as identified previously [Zhang et al., 2005]) and show a robust response to phase-shifting stimuli. These transcripts showed increased induction in cells treated with siSik1 and attenuation with siCrtc (Figures 2H, 2I, S3F, and S3G and Tables 1 and 2). A summary of these results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. These data support our hypothesis that SIK1 acts to modulate the magnitude of phase shifts via the negative regulation of CREB-mediated transcription of Per1.

Pharmacological Inhibition of SIK1 Results in Augmented Phase-Shifting Responses

Findings from the in vitro study using RNAi in fibroblasts were further supported by data from the direct pharmacological inhibition of SIK1 by indirubin-3′-monoxime (I3M) (Hashimoto et al., 2008) (Figure 3A), which produced both an increase in the level and the duration of serum-induced Per1 and Per2 expression in NIH 3T3 cells following a serum shock (Figures 3B and 3C). In order to quantify the phase shift induced, we used PER2::LUC mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in a double-serum treatment experiment (Balsalobre et al., 1998). The first serum shock was used to synchronize the cells and the second to allow precise quantification of the phase shift. We observed a 10.90 ± 1.02 hr phase delay of the PER2::LUC rhythm in I3M-treated cells, compared with 7.59 ± 1.00 hr delay in the control, a difference of 3.3 hr (Figures 3D and 3E). In order to assess the effect of I3M on the SCN, Per1:luc mice were exposed to light at ZT14 for 10 min, and the SCN was removed and maintained in culture. The rhythms of SCN treated with I3M peaked approximately 1 hr later than DMSO-treated controls (Figure 3F). It should be noted that I3M is a nonspecific inhibitor of SIK1, and although directly inhibiting SIK1 (Figure 3A), its targets also include the kinase GSK3B, which has a role in the circadian clock (Hashimoto et al., 2008). Nevertheless, these results using I3M and those using Sik1-specific RNAi are consistent (Figure 2). Collectively, these data show that inhibition of SIK1 increases the magnitude of phase delays in the molecular clock.

Phase-Shifting Stimuli Induce CRTC1 Nuclear Translocation and Sik1 Induction in the SCN

Of the different CRTC isoforms, CRTC1 is the most abundantly expressed in the SCN (Figure 4A). Therefore, we investigated whether phase-shifting stimuli trigger the nuclear translocation of CRTC1 in the SCN. Application of a serum shock to dissociated SCN cells in culture resulted in the translocation of CRTC1 from the nucleus to cytoplasm within 10 min (Figure 4B) and an upregulation of SIK1 in the SCN at 120 min after the light pulse (Figure 4C). We verified the expression patterns of Sik1 in the SCN seen on the exon arrays using qPCR (Figure 4D). Sik1 was light-induced with a peak mRNA expression at 60 min following both a CT16 phase-delaying and CT22 phase-advancing light pulse in wild-type mice, confirming a role for Sik1 in both phase advances as well as phase delays. Further, Sik1 induction is higher at CT22 when compared with CT16. In agreement with a role of SIK1 in negative feedback, Egr1 and Nr4a1 expression were found to be correspondingly lower at CT22.

siRNA-Mediated Knockdown of Sik1 In Vivo Results in Enhanced Behavioral Responses to Light

To address effect of SIK1 on circadian behavior, we used in vivo RNAi to provide an acute and specific inhibition of Sik1 within the SCN. Cy3-labeled nontargeting siRNA-lipid complex was administered via stereotaxic injection into the third ventricle adjacent to the SCN. Subsequent examination of the SCN showed the accumulation of siRNA in the cell bodies (Figure S4A), confirming transfection. We designed and tested siRNAs against Sik1 that achieved significant in vivo silencing in the SCN at both mRNA and protein levels (Figure S4B), causing little or no interferon responses (Figure S4C).

We then assessed behavioral responses in Sik1-silenced mice to three light regimes: (1) a phase-delaying nocturnal light pulse; (2) re-entrainment to a 6 hr phase advanced LD cycle (jet-lag protocol) and (3) period length in constant darkness (DD). For the phase-shifting paradigm, mice injected with either a control siRNA or Sik1 siRNA were exposed 4 days later to a 30 min, type II phase-shifting light pulse (400 lux) at CT14.5 (Figure 5A). Compared with the controls, the mice with Sik1 silenced showed significantly enhanced phase shifts (98 min compared to 50 min, p = 0.036, Figure 5B). For the jet-lag protocol, 2 days after siRNA administration, the LD cycle was advanced 6 hr, and 10 days later, the cycle was advanced 6 hr again. Sik1 silenced mice showed significantly faster re-entrainment when compared to the controls in both cycles (Figure 5C). To illustrate the magnitude of this effect, on day 2 the difference in phase was over 3 hr in the siNT-injected animals but was less than 1 hr in the Sik1-silenced mice (Figure 5D).

For period length, we measured period length (tau) in both cell lines (Per2::Luc U2OS) as well as in vivo after Sik1 knockdown. Period length was markedly increased in cell lines (24.8 hr with greater than 90% knockdown of Sik1 versus 22.1 hr with siNT-treated cells), and less so in vivo (23.27 hr with approximately 50% knockdown of Sik1 versus 23.04 siNT, Figure S5). These data suggest that in addition to acute effects on gene expression, CREB may play a role in constitutive clock gene regulation. Indeed, recent reports show that CREB silencing results in overall lower expression of clock genes and output hormones such as AVP and VIP (Lee et al., 2010). In this case, basal levels of SIK1 would be important in regulating the activity of CRTC, which in turn acts as a CREB coactivator. As a result, basal levels of SIK1 may affect period length via this CREB-dependent mechanism.

Collectively, our in vitro studies combined with these behavioral data, provide critical support for a role of SIK1 acting as an inducible repressor inhibiting the effect of phase-shifting stimuli on the circadian clock by attenuating Per1 induction.


Discussion

The circadian system is entrained to environmental zeitgebers (time givers), which allow the appropriate alignment of internal and external time. However, the adjustment of the clock to such zeitgebers is rarely instantaneous, often occurring over repeated 24 hr cycles. What limits the effects of entraining stimuli on the circadian system represents a key, yet largely unanswered question. This issue provides the focus for the work presented here. We have identified >500 genes that are light regulated within the SCN. From these, we defined a key role for the CRTC-SIK1 pathway in regulating CREB-mediated clock gene expression. Our data show both in vitro and in vivo that CRTC1 translocates to the nucleus after phase-shifting stimuli and acts as a coactivator of CREB-driven transcription of Sik1 and Per1. Following in vitro Crtc silencing, induction of Per1 and other CREB-mediated genes is greatly attenuated. Elevated Per1 aligns the transcriptional/translational-feedback loop to the zeitgeber stimulus (Albrecht, 2012; Albrecht et al., 1997). We also show that SIK1 phosphorylates and deactivates CRTC with an appropriate time delay, which effectively blocks further CREB-driven Per1 transcription. Critically, we show that in vivo RNAi knockdown of Sik1 within the SCN greatly enhances light-induced behavioral phase shifts and re-entrainment to LD cycles. Collectively, these data provide empirical evidence for a molecular mechanism that limits the impact of an entraining stimulus on the circadian system.

It is worth emphasizing that the SIK1-CRTC regulation of CREB-mediated gene expression we describe within the context of the circadian system has also been demonstrated in several nonclock pathways. For example, in skeletal myocytes, SIK1 functions as a Ca2+-responsive CREB-regulated HDAC kinase (Berdeaux et al., 2007) and a Ca2+-induced regulator of Na+ transport in kidney cells (Sjöström et al., 2007). In hippocampal neurons, CRTC1 functions as a sensor of stimulation, by traveling from the synapse to the nucleus in response to activation, triggering CREB mediated transcription and thereby regulating hippocampal plasticity (Ch’ng et al., 2012). An appreciation of the role of CRTC1-SIK1 regulation in these noncircadian pathways very much supports our interpretation of how this signaling pathway functions within the molecular clock.

The same regulatory processes that induce Per1 also induce Sik1. Following the induction of these genes, phosphorylation then plays a key, yet distinct, role in the molecular clockwork. The phosphorylation of core clock proteins is a major posttranslational event whereby delays are introduced into the transcriptional-translational-feedback loop to generate a ∼24 hr oscillation. Several proteins have been described in this process, including FBXL3, an F box protein that targets phosphorylated CRY for degradation (Godinho et al., 2007); CSNK1e, in the Tau mutant hamster, which phosphorylates PER1, CRY1, and BMAL1 (Lowrey et al., 2000) and NEMO/NLK that phosphorylates PER to initiate a time-delay phosphorylation circuit (Chiu et al., 2011). In contrast to these kinases, SIK1 does not target the core clock proteins to control their degradation; rather, it attenuates the induction of clock genes in response to entraining stimuli, functioning as a negative-feedback mechanism to deactivate the molecular pathways that are activated following a phase-shifting stimulus.

But why limit the impact of an entraining stimulus on the clock? Almost all physiological systems benefit from buffering mechanisms that prevent sudden and large changes, and in this regard the circadian system is no exception. This would be particularly important for the clock because it has to maintain internal synchrony between the multiple cell-autonomous circadian oscillators throughout the body. If sudden and large shifts are imposed upon one part of the circadian network, such as the SCN, internal desynchrony among the cellular clocks of the body will result. Under such circumstances normal physiology will be severely compromised (Albrecht, 2012). By limiting the phase-shifting effects of light and other clock-resetting stimuli, such as food (Stokkan et al., 2001) or activity (Mrosovsky and Salmon, 1987) the circadian system would be shielded from such disruption. Such a buffering mechanism in the natural world would protect the clock from abnormal Zeitgeber stimuli. In addition, limiting the impact of light on the SCN would be useful in nonequatorial latitudes during the equinoxes when the time of dawn and dusk, along with activity and food availability, moves very rapidly. With a rapidly changing twilight transition, the circadian system has to maintain a balance between entrainment and the prevention of internal de-synchrony. Under these conditions, CRTC1-SIK1-driven inhibition of Per transcription may help achieve this compromise.

Sleep and circadian rhythms disruption (SCRD) is endemic within the 24/7 economies of the developed and developing industrialized societies (Foster and Wulff, 2005). In addition, SCRD is a common feature of both neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disease (Wulff et al., 2010). In shift-work, jet lag, and brain abnormalities in general, SCRD is associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, immune dysfunction, and impaired cognition (Hastings et al., 2003). Currently, there are very few options available to stabilize or adjust the circadian axis and sleep timing in individuals with SCRD. However, the discovery of the molecular mechanisms that generate and regulate the circadian system provides targets for the development of therapeutic agents that regulate internal time. Indeed, there have been recent efforts in this direction, including the use of small molecule activators of cryptochrome (Hirota et al., 2012) and an inhibitor of CSNK1E (Meng et al., 2010). Such modulators act on the central clock to lengthen or shorten period. An alternative approach would be to shift the clock to an appropriate phase. As SIK1 acts to suppress the effects on light on the clock, this pathway presents a tractable target.


Experimental Procedures
Animals

Opn4−/− mice (Hattar et al., 2002; Lucas et al., 2003) were maintained on a C57Bl/6_129Sv background as heterozygous breeders. For SCN sample collection and RNA extraction, see Extended Experimental Procedures.

Affymetrix Whole-Genome Exon Array Experiments

Sense probes were prepared for hybridization from 300 ng of total RNA for Opn4+/+ shams SCN (n = 6), LP30, LP60, and LP120 (n = 4) and Opn4−/− shams (n = 4), LP30, LP60, and LP120 (n = 3) using the GeneChip WT Sense Target Labeling kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and hybridized overnight to GeneChip Mouse Exon 1.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix Santa Clara, CA, USA). Arrays were washed, stained, and scanned according to manufacturer’s guidelines.

GeneChip Data Analysis

CEL file data were extracted, log transformed and quantile normalized with Expression Console (v1.1) software from Affymetrix using the RMA-sketch algorithm at the exon-core probe set level including the detection above background (DABG) p value for each probe set. Exon array quality control was assessed using Expression Console (V1.1) and any outliers removed. Subsequent analysis steps were carried out in Microsoft Excel 2007. Probe sets were filtered by DABG p value for each array sequentially, discarding data for probe sets for which p ≥ 0.05. Only probe sets called as “present” on all arrays (n = 18) were further analyzed (110,026 probe sets) by one-way ANOVA and filtered by p value (p ≤0.05) (corresponding to 4,384 probe sets that respond to light). Genes that were light-responsive were identified by significant probe set enrichment. Probe set enrichment was evaluated by comparing the number of significant probe sets for an individual gene to (1) number of probe sets on the array for that gene, (2) number of probe sets significantly changing, and (3) the total number of probe sets on the array based upon a binomial distribution. Finally, probe sets were filtered by probe set enrichment p value of p < 0.05 (1,417 probe sets corresponding to 536 genes with the false-positive rate determined to be 0.02). The same probe sets were subsequently analyzed in the Opn4−/− data to assess attenuation. Refer to extended experimental procedures for hierarchical clustering, functional pathway analysis and TFBS prediction.

For qPCR, primer sequences, western blotting, immunostaining, microscopy, CRTC phosphorylation assay, and I3M-based studies, see Supplemental Information.

RNAi Studies

siRNAs were synthesized as siGENOME (Dharmacon) for in vitro experiments, siSTABLE (Dharmacon) or custom synthesized by Roche for in vivo work. The siRNAs supplied by Roche were moderately stabilized for in vivo use and tagged with a cholesterol conjugate to aid transfection. The sequences are as described in Supplemental Information.

In Vitro RNAi

NIH 3T3 cells (mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C, 5% CO2. Where required, cells were transfected with 10 nM siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAimax (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were maintained for at least 24 hr in 1% FBS in DMEM at confluence. At 0 min, the cells were synchronized by application of 50% horse serum (Balsalobre et al., 1998; Duffield et al., 2002) returned to 1% FBS in DMEM after 30 min (serum shock treatment). RNA was isolated from cells at 30 min intervals over 3 hr. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) and qPCR was performed as discussed in supplementary material to measure knockdown/gene expression.

In Vivo RNAi

siRNA complexed with Invivofectamine (Invitrogen) prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions were delivered using microinjection into the 3V with sterotaxic equipment with coordinates (Paxinos and Franklin, 2008) as described previously (Butcher et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2007). Mice were allowed to recover and returned to the light-tight chambers for further experiments. For visualization of siRNA, 5′ Cy3-labeled nontargeting siRNA was injected into the 3V, and 24 hr later, the animals were sacrificed. Tissue processing and imaging were conducted as described in Supplemental Information. To measure silencing of Sik1, mice were injected with either siNT or siSik1 and 96 hr later were sacrificed, SCN collected on which RNA extraction and qPCR were conducted for the required mRNAs. To check for activation of an interferon response, a common off-target effect of siRNA, Oas1 mRNA levels (Bauer et al., 2009) from siRNA (siNT and siSik1)-injected mice were compared with noninjected controls (Figure S4). For phase-shifting studies, C57Bl/6 mice were maintained on running wheels in light tight chambers on a 12:12 hr LD cycle (400 lux from white LED lamps) and injected with siRNA as above. Four days after the injection, the mice were placed in DD for 24 hr and received a 30 min light pulse at approximately CT14.5. This time point was chosen to allow all experimental subjects to receive a light pulse within the maximal phase delay zone of CT14–16 (Pendergast et al., 2010). The mice were then allowed to free run for 14 days in DD, running wheel activity data were collected and analyzed on Clocklab (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL, USA). For jet-lag studies, C57Bl/6 mice were maintained on running wheels in light tight chambers on a 12:12 hr LD cycle (400 lux from white LED lamps) and injected with siRNA as above. Two days after injection, the LD cycle was shifted 6 hr in advance. Ten days later, the mice were shifted 6 hr in advance again. Onset of activity on each day was used to measure phase relative to the LD cycle.

Extended Experimental Procedures 
SCN Tissue Collection

Animals were housed under a reversed 12:12 hr LD cycle for 2 weeks with food and water ad libitum. A light pulse (LP) of 400-500 lux was administered at CT16 for 30 min, using a SpectraNova halogen white light (Schott AG, Mainz, Germany). Animals were sacrificed under dim red light by cervical dislocation at 30, 60, and 120 min after the onset of the light pulse. The eyes were immediately removed to prevent any photic stimulation to the SCN. Sham-treated mice not given a light pulse were dissected at each time point. Brains were removed and placed into a brain matrix (Kent Scientific, Torrington CT, USA). A skin graft blade (Swann-Morton, Sheffield, UK) was positioned at Bregma −0.10 mm (Figure S1). A second blade was placed 1 mm (Bregma −1.10) caudal from the first, and a 1 mm thick brain slice was dissected. SCN punches were taken using a sample corer (1 mm internal diameter, Fine Science Tools GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) from the brain slice (n = 4), flash frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C prior to RNA extraction. All procedures were performed in accordance with the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the University of Oxford’s Policy on the Use of Animals in Scientific Research.

RNA Extraction and Sample Preparation

Total RNA was extracted using the microRNeasy column method (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Quality and quantity of RNA were measured using an Agilent Bioanalyzer and a Nanodrop1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA), respectively. To ensure that punches of the defined areas were accurately dissected, qPCR of the SCN-specific mRNA Six6 and Per1 were conducted (Conte et al., 2005), revealing selective enrichment (Figure S1).

Functional Pathway Analysis

The transcripts found to be significantly altered following the light pulse in the Opn4+/+ animals were and those then downregulated in the Opn4−/− were examined using the DAVID ontology tools (Huang da et al., 2009)[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. 536 transcript cluster IDs from the Opn4+/+ corresponded to 527 DAVID identifiers and these were used to generate functional annotation charts using DAVID default ontologies for GO, pathways and protein domains (as of 28 Nov 2011). These annotation charts were visualized using the enrichment map (Merico et al., 2010) plugin for Cytoscape (Shannon et al., 2003).

Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction

We used a comparative genomics approach based on multiple sequence alignments of genomic sequences from several mammalian species: human, dog, horse, cow, pig, rabbit, mouse and rat. TFBSs are represented by position-specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) (Badis et al., 2009) as obtained from the TransFac database (version 11.4) (Matys et al., 2006) and the JASPAR (Vlieghe et al., 2006) collection. We used the ProfileStats package (Rahmann et al., 2003) to regularize the count matrices. The resulting scoring matrices were then used to scan genomic sequences (excluding known protein-coding stretches) from all species studied individually, and on both forward and reverse strands. We considered those matches that were conserved in at least two species.

TFBSs are characterized by two parameters: an “expectation ratio” (ER), estimating the relative probability of finding a PSSM match of the given quality in a random sequence of 500 bp length and genome background base composition, and the number of allowed mismatching species in the alignment. Thus, predictions with a low ER and few or none mismatching species have the strongest support.

Quantitative PCR

RNA samples were prepared as described for microarray hybridization. cDNA was synthesized with a qScript cDNA synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD), and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was conducted with Sybr green I and an SDS7700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Relative quantification of transcript levels was done as described previously (Peirson et al., 2003). The geometric mean of three housekeeping genes was used for normalization (Gapdh, Actb, and Arbp). Primer sequences are provided in Table S5.

Dissociation of SCN Cells and Culture

P0 neonatal mice(from C57 BL/6 and C3H backgrounds) were killed by decapitation and the brains dissected in to ice-cold PBS. Micro-dissection was carried out under a stereomicroscope to isolate the optic chiasm and the surrounding hypothalamus up to ∼1 mm caudal and ventral to the chiasm. This region should contain the SCN, but was not considered to yield purely SCN-specific cells. The tissue was then dissociated using a Papain dissociation system (Worthington Biochemical Corp, Lakewood, NJ, USA), using incubation times from 50–70 min. single-cell suspensions were generated using a series of sterile plastic Pasteur pipettes with decreasing bores (Appleton Woods, UK). Final cell densities of 105 cells/ml were prepared in DMEM as before (with the addition of B27 supplement, Invitrogen, Oregon, USA) and cells were plated on sterile, poly-L-lysine-treated glass slides, prepared using silicone chamber gaskets (CoverWell, Invitrogen, Oregon, USA) and allowed to recover for at least 48hr.

CRTC1 Immunostaining

Images are NIH 3T3 cells/dissociated SCN cell culture grown on glass slides using CoverWell perfusion chamber gaskets. Individual chambers on the same slide were changed to media containing 50% horse serum at 10 and 0 min prior to washing with PBS and fixation with PBS +4% PFA. Slides were processed using a monoclonal rabbit antibody to CRTC1 (C71D11, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) (Jeong et al., 2011) at a concentration of 1:100. Images were collected using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Cambridge, UK).

CRTC Phosphorylation

NIH 3T3 cells (mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were cultured to confluence in 6 well plates, incubated in 1% FBS for at least 24 hr followed by application of 50% horse serum for 30 min (serum shock) to synchronize cellular rhythms and induce expression of Sik1 and Per1 as shown in Figure 3. Cells then were then washed with PBS lysed at the required time points in 200 μl kinase lysis buffer (Jansson et al., 2008) (25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 5% glycerol, 5 mM β-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaVO4, 1 mM DTT, complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) and Phosphatase Inhibitor cocktail (Sigma – Aldrich, Dorset, England). 10 μg CRTC peptide (rlpsalnrts sdsalhtsvm, containing the SIK1 phosphorylation site of all three CRTC isoforms) was blotted onto circles of Whatmann Nitrocellulose 0.25um membrane (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) punched with a paper punch and allowed to dry. The membrane was then blocked with 10% BSA for 30 min. 35 μl lysate or 0.1 μg SIK1 (ab89693, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or 0.1 μg SIK1 + drug (20 μM Indirubin-3-Monoxime or 100 nM Staurosporine) in 50 μl kinase buffer (Jansson et al., 2008) and 2 μCi (γ32P)ATP were added to the membrane in a 50 μl reaction and allowed to incubate at RT for 20 min. The membranes were then washed 5x with TBS – 0.2% Tween-20, rinsed with water and detected using a Typhoon Phosphor Imager System (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA).

Determining the Effect of Indirubin-3′-Monoxime on Serum-Induced Per1 and Per2 Expression

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from PER2::LUCIFERASE C57Bl/6 mice (PER2:LUC) (Gamsby et al., 2009; Yoo et al., 2004); were cultured in DMEM + 10% FBS + antibiotic (HyClone, Logan, UT). Confluent cells were maintained in DMEM + 1% FBS + antibiotics for 24–48 hr. Confluent cells were treated with I3M (20 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) with DMSO (0.06%) or DMSO alone (vehicle control) 30 min before time 0 min. I3M has been shown to inhibit SIK1 activity on TORC by preventing the phosphorylation and consequent activation of SIK1 (Hashimoto et al., 2008) and also directly inhibits SIK1 activity as shown by the CRTC phosphorylation assay as described above. The autonomous cellular rhythms were synchronized with a serum treatment (Balsalobre et al., 1998; Duffield et al., 2002). At 0 min, cells were treated with 50% horse serum (HS) plus I3M + DMSO or DMSO in DMEM, and RNA was isolated from cells at 30 min intervals over 4 hr. Treatment medium was maintained on the cells throughout the experiment. qRT-PCR using cDNA prepared from each time point was used to measure relative per1 and per2 mRNA levels and conducted as previously described using the standard curve method and normalized to GAPDH (Duffield et al., 2002; Hou et al., 2009). per2 Taqman reagents (forward 5′-CCCATCCCACACTTGCCTC-3′, reverse 5′-CACTGTGCCAGCCGGG-3′; probe 6FAM-CCAGGCTGAGTTCCCTAGTCGGACCT-TAMRA).

Measuring I3M Modulation of Serum-Induced Phase Shifts of PER2::LUC Cells

PER2::LUC MEFs were cultured in 35 mm Petri dishes in DMEM + 10% FBS + antibiotic (HyClone). Once confluent, the cells were maintained in DMEM + 1% FBS + antibiotics for 24 – 48 hr. The cellular rhythms were synchronized with a 30 min 50% HS treatment. Ten hours later, the cells were treated with a second 30 min 50% HS pulse with either I3M (20 μM) and DMSO (0.06%) or DMSO alone (vehicle control), which results in a delay shift of the rhythm of a defined magnitude. Experimental cells were pretreated 30 min prior with either I3M or DMSO alone. The cells were then placed in Leibovitz’s-15 media (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) with 1% FBS and 0.1μM Luciferin (Gold Bio Technology, St. Louis, MO), dishes sealed and placed into a LumiCycle instrument (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL). For the first 3 hr, media also contained I3M + DMSO or DMSO. Cultures were maintained at 37°C during media exchanges. Rhythmic expression of PER2::LUC activity was measured by luminometry (Gamsby et al., 2009; Yamazaki and Takahashi, 2005). Peaks were determined using the Actimetrics LumiCycle Analysis software and determining the time after the start of the first serum pulse at which each peak reached its maximum. Phase differences between treatment groups were determined using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD tests (p < 0.05; n = 6-13 cultures per treatment group).

Measuring I3M Modulation of Light-Induced Phase Shifts of SCN Per1:luciferase Expression

Adult Per1:luciferase mice (Wilsbacher et al., 2002) (Per1:luc, CD1 background; 3–4 months; n = 8) maintained on a 12:12 hr LD cycle were exposed to a 10 min light pulse (400 lux) at ZT14-14.5. Mice were immediately sacrificed and SCN tissue isolated and cultured as previously described (Yamazaki and Takahashi, 2005). SCN were maintained in media containing 0.1 μM Luciferin and either 20 μM I3M + DMSO or DMSO alone. After 3 hr, the treatment media was replaced with fresh recording media, including 2x 15 min washes. Cultures were maintained at 37°C during media exchanges. Explant cultures were monitored for several days in the LumiCycle instrument, per1:luc expression monitored by luminescence, and peak phase within the first circadian cycle determined. Phase differences between treatment groups were determined using Student’s t test (p < 0.05). All procedures were approved by the University of Notre Dame Animal care and Use Committee and performed in accordance with NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

RNAi

siRNA sequences are as follows; Sik1 (in vivo): 5′ GCUCAACCCUCCUUGCAUA 3′; Nontargeting siRNA: 5′ CUUACGCUGAGUACUUCGA 3′; Sik1 (2, in vitro): 5′ UGAACAAGAUCAAAGGGUU 3′; Sik1 (3, in vitro): 5′ AAACGCAGGUUGCAAUAAA 3′; Crtc1: 5′ UGGACAGAGUAUAUCGUGA 3′; Crtc3: 5′ GUUUCGAGCUGACCGGCUA 3′; Sik1 (human): 5′ ACGAUUAGAUUCAAGCAAU 3′; Cry1 (human): 5′ GGAGUUAAUUAUCCUAAAC 3′.

Western Blotting

As shown in Figure 4C, 2 μg SCN lysate in RIPA buffer were run on 4%–20% SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), transferred using a semi-dry protocol on the Turbo Transfer system (Bio-Rad) onto PVDF membranes, blocked with 3% BSA, incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to SIK1 (SIK1 (Y-20) sc-83754, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1:1000) and Beta-ACTIN (ab8227, Abcam, 1:5000), subsequently with a donkey anti-rabbit IgG HRP conjugated antibody (ab98503, Abcam, 1:5000) and developed with a standard ECL protocol (Luminata Classico, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

As shown in Figure 4E: 5 μg of SCN (from NT or Sik1 siRNA-injected animals) in RIPA buffer were run on 4%–20% SDS-PAGE gels (NuPAGE, Life Technologies), transferred using standard protocols (Bio-Rad) onto Immobilon FL PVDF membranes (Millipore), blocked with Odyssey blocking buffer (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to SIK1 (ab64428, Abcam, 1:500) and Beta-Actin (ab8227, Abcam, 1:1000), subsequently with donkey anti-rabbit IgG 488 Dylite conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA, 1:200) and scanned with a Typhoon Scanner (GE Healthcare).

Assays Using Per2::Luc U2OS Cells

U2OS cells stably transfected with a Per2::Luc reporter were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. For siRNA-based experiments, cells were seeded at 5,000 per well into white 384-well plates and transfected with 20 nM siRNA the next day. Two days later, the cells were synchronized with 100 nM dexamethasone and the medium replaced with phenol-red free DMEM supplemented with B-27 and 100 μM luciferin potassium salt (Buhr et al., 2010) and sealed. Per2::Luc rhythms were recorded from a BMG Labtech Fluostar Omega plate reader maintained at 36°C and readings taken from each well every hour. Data were then analyzed using BRASS (http://millar.bio.ed.ac.uk/PEBrown/BRASS/BrassPage.htm).


References
Albrecht U.. Timing to perfection: the biology of central and peripheral circadian clocksNeuron74Year: 201224626022542179
Albrecht U.,Sun Z.S.,Eichele G.,Lee C.C.. A differential response of two putative mammalian circadian regulators, mper1 and mper2, to lightCell91Year: 1997105510649428527
Altarejos J.Y.,Montminy M.. CREB and the CRTC co-activators: sensors for hormonal and metabolic signalsNat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.12Year: 201114115121346730
Aschoff J.r.. Biological rhythmsYear: 1981Plenum PressNew York
Balsalobre A.,Damiola F.,Schibler U.. A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian tissue culture cellsCell93Year: 19989299379635423
Bauer M.,Kinkl N.,Meixner A.,Kremmer E.,Riemenschneider M.,Förstl H.,Gasser T.,Ueffing M.. Prevention of interferon-stimulated gene expression using microRNA-designed hairpinsGene Ther.16Year: 200914214718701917
Berdeaux R.,Goebel N.,Banaszynski L.,Takemori H.,Wandless T.,Shelton G.D.,Montminy M.. SIK1 is a class II HDAC kinase that promotes survival of skeletal myocytesNat. Med.13Year: 200759760317468767
Butcher G.Q.,Doner J.,Dziema H.,Collamore M.,Burgoon P.W.,Obrietan K.. The p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway couples photic input to circadian clock entrainmentJ. Biol. Chem.277Year: 2002295192952512042309
Cagnol S.,Rivard N.. Oncogenic KRAS and BRAF activation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway promotes expression of dual-specificity phosphatase 4 (DUSP4/MKP2) resulting in nuclear ERK1/2 inhibitionOncogene32Year: 201356457622430215
Ch’ng T.H.,Uzgil B.,Lin P.,Avliyakulov N.K.,O’Dell T.J.,Martin K.C.. Activity-dependent transport of the transcriptional coactivator CRTC1 from synapse to nucleusCell150Year: 201220722122770221
Cheng H.Y.,Papp J.W.,Varlamova O.,Dziema H.,Russell B.,Curfman J.P.,Nakazawa T.,Shimizu K.,Okamura H.,Impey S.,Obrietan K.. microRNA modulation of circadian-clock period and entrainmentNeuron54Year: 200781382917553428
Chiu J.C.,Ko H.W.,Edery I.. NEMO/NLK phosphorylates PERIOD to initiate a time-delay phosphorylation circuit that sets circadian clock speedCell145Year: 201135737021514639
Doi M.,Cho S.,Yujnovsky I.,Hirayama J.,Cermakian N.,Cato A.C.,Sassone-Corsi P.. Light-inducible and clock-controlled expression of MAP kinase phosphatase 1 in mouse central pacemaker neuronsJ. Biol. Rhythms22Year: 200712713917440214
Duffield G.E.,Best J.D.,Meurers B.H.,Bittner A.,Loros J.J.,Dunlap J.C.. Circadian programs of transcriptional activation, signaling, and protein turnover revealed by microarray analysis of mammalian cellsCurr. Biol.12Year: 200255155711937023
Foster R.G.,Wulff K.. The rhythm of rest and excessNat. Rev. Neurosci.6Year: 200540741415861183
Freedman M.S.,Lucas R.J.,Soni B.,von Schantz M.,Muñoz M.,David-Gray Z.,Foster R.. Regulation of mammalian circadian behavior by non-rod, non-cone, ocular photoreceptorsScience284Year: 199950250410205061
Fukushima T.,Shimazoe T.,Shibata S.,Watanabe A.,Ono M.,Hamada T.,Watanabe S.. The involvement of calmodulin and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the circadian rhythms controlled by the suprachiasmatic nucleusNeurosci. Lett.227Year: 199745489178855
Gau D.,Lemberger T.,von Gall C.,Kretz O.,Le Minh N.,Gass P.,Schmid W.,Schibler U.,Korf H.W.,Schütz G.. Phosphorylation of CREB Ser142 regulates light-induced phase shifts of the circadian clockNeuron34Year: 200224525311970866
Ginty D.D.,Kornhauser J.M.,Thompson M.A.,Bading H.,Mayo K.E.,Takahashi J.S.,Greenberg M.E.. Regulation of CREB phosphorylation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by light and a circadian clockScience260Year: 19932382418097062
Godinho S.I.,Maywood E.S.,Shaw L.,Tucci V.,Barnard A.R.,Busino L.,Pagano M.,Kendall R.,Quwailid M.M.,Romero M.R.. The after-hours mutant reveals a role for Fbxl3 in determining mammalian circadian periodScience316Year: 200789790017463252
Güler A.D.,Ecker J.L.,Lall G.S.,Haq S.,Altimus C.M.,Liao H.W.,Barnard A.R.,Cahill H.,Badea T.C.,Zhao H.. Melanopsin cells are the principal conduits for rod-cone input to non-image-forming visionNature453Year: 200810210518432195
Hannibal J.,Møller M.,Ottersen O.P.,Fahrenkrug J.. PACAP and glutamate are co-stored in the retinohypothalamic tractJ. Comp. Neurol.418Year: 200014715510701440
Hashimoto Y.K.,Satoh T.,Okamoto M.,Takemori H.. Importance of autophosphorylation at Ser186 in the A-loop of salt inducible kinase 1 for its sustained kinase activityJ. Cell. Biochem.104Year: 20081724173918348280
Hastings M.H.,Reddy A.B.,Maywood E.S.. A clockwork web: circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and diseaseNat. Rev. Neurosci.4Year: 200364966112894240
Hattar S.,Liao H.W.,Takao M.,Berson D.M.,Yau K.W.. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivityScience295Year: 20021065107011834834
Hattar S.,Lucas R.J.,Mrosovsky N.,Thompson S.,Douglas R.H.,Hankins M.W.,Lem J.,Biel M.,Hofmann F.,Foster R.G.,Yau K.W.. Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in miceNature424Year: 2003768112808468
Hirota T.,Lee J.W.,St John P.C.,Sawa M.,Iwaisako K.,Noguchi T.,Pongsawakul P.Y.,Sonntag T.,Welsh D.K.,Brenner D.A.. Identification of small molecule activators of cryptochromeScience337Year: 20121094109722798407
Kanyo R.,Price D.M.,Chik C.L.,Ho A.K.. Salt-inducible kinase 1 in the rat pinealocyte: adrenergic regulation and role in arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase gene transcriptionEndocrinology150Year: 20094221423019470703
Katoh Y.,Takemori H.,Lin X.Z.,Tamura M.,Muraoka M.,Satoh T.,Tsuchiya Y.,Min L.,Doi J.,Miyauchi A.. Silencing the constitutive active transcription factor CREB by the LKB1-SIK signaling cascadeFEBS J.273Year: 20062730274816817901
Kim D.Y.,Kang H.C.,Shin H.C.,Lee K.J.,Yoon Y.W.,Han H.C.,Na H.S.,Hong S.K.,Kim Y.I.. Substance p plays a critical role in photic resetting of the circadian pacemaker in the rat hypothalamusJ. Neurosci.21Year: 20014026403111356889
Lall G.S.,Revell V.L.,Momiji H.,Al Enezi J.,Altimus C.M.,Güler A.D.,Aguilar C.,Cameron M.A.,Allender S.,Hankins M.W.,Lucas R.J.. Distinct contributions of rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors to encoding irradianceNeuron66Year: 201041742820471354
Lamia K.A.,Sachdeva U.M.,DiTacchio L.,Williams E.C.,Alvarez J.G.,Egan D.F.,Vasquez D.S.,Juguilon H.,Panda S.,Shaw R.J.. AMPK regulates the circadian clock by cryptochrome phosphorylation and degradationScience326Year: 200943744019833968
Lee B.,Li A.,Hansen K.F.,Cao R.,Yoon J.H.,Obrietan K.. CREB influences timing and entrainment of the SCN circadian clockJ. Biol. Rhythms25Year: 201041042021135157
Lin J.T.,Kornhauser J.M.,Singh N.P.,Mayo K.E.,Takahashi J.S.. Visual sensitivities of nur77 (NGFI-B) and zif268 (NGFI-A) induction in the suprachiasmatic nucleus are dissociated from c-fos induction and behavioral phase-shifting responsesBrain Res. Mol. Brain Res.46Year: 19973033109191106
Lowrey P.L.,Shimomura K.,Antoch M.P.,Yamazaki S.,Zemenides P.D.,Ralph M.R.,Menaker M.,Takahashi J.S.. Positional syntenic cloning and functional characterization of the mammalian circadian mutation tauScience288Year: 200048349210775102
Lucas R.J.,Hattar S.,Takao M.,Berson D.M.,Foster R.G.,Yau K.W.. Diminished pupillary light reflex at high irradiances in melanopsin-knockout miceScience299Year: 200324524712522249
Lupi D.,Sekaran S.,Jones S.L.,Hankins M.W.,Foster R.G.. Light-evoked FOS induction within the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of melanopsin knockout (Opn4-/-) mice: a developmental studyChronobiol. Int.23Year: 200616717916687291
Meijer J.H.,Schwartz W.J.. In search of the pathways for light-induced pacemaker resetting in the suprachiasmatic nucleusJ. Biol. Rhythms18Year: 200323524912828281
Meng Q.J.,Maywood E.S.,Bechtold D.A.,Lu W.Q.,Li J.,Gibbs J.E.,Dupré S.M.,Chesham J.E.,Rajamohan F.,Knafels J.. Entrainment of disrupted circadian behavior through inhibition of casein kinase 1 (CK1) enzymesProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107Year: 2010152401524520696890
Morris M.E.,Viswanathan N.,Kuhlman S.,Davis F.C.,Weitz C.J.. A screen for genes induced in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by lightScience279Year: 1998154415479488654
Mrosovsky N.,Salmon P.A.. A behavioural method for accelerating re-entrainment of rhythms to new light-dark cyclesNature330Year: 19873723733683553
Paxinos G.,Franklin K.B.J.. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic CoordinatesYear: 2008Academic PressBoston
Pendergast J.S.,Friday R.C.,Yamazaki S.. Photic entrainment of period mutant mice is predicted from their phase response curvesJ. Neurosci.30Year: 2010121791218420826680
Porterfield V.M.,Piontkivska H.,Mintz E.M.. Identification of novel light-induced genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleusBMC Neurosci.8Year: 20079818021443
Ralph M.R.,Foster R.G.,Davis F.C.,Menaker M.. Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian periodScience247Year: 19909759782305266
Reppert S.M.,Weaver D.R.. Coordination of circadian timing in mammalsNature418Year: 200293594112198538
Ruby N.F.,Brennan T.J.,Xie X.,Cao V.,Franken P.,Heller H.C.,O’Hara B.F.. Role of melanopsin in circadian responses to lightScience298Year: 20022211221312481140
Schwartz W.J.,Tavakoli-Nezhad M.,Lambert C.M.,Weaver D.R.,de la Iglesia H.O.. Distinct patterns of Period gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus underlie circadian clock photoentrainment by advances or delaysProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108Year: 2011172191722421969555
Screaton R.A.,Conkright M.D.,Katoh Y.,Best J.L.,Canettieri G.,Jeffries S.,Guzman E.,Niessen S.,Yates J.R. 3rd,Takemori H.. The CREB coactivator TORC2 functions as a calcium- and cAMP-sensitive coincidence detectorCell119Year: 2004617415454081
Sjöström M.,Stenström K.,Eneling K.,Zwiller J.,Katz A.I.,Takemori H.,Bertorello A.M.. SIK1 is part of a cell sodium-sensing network that regulates active sodium transport through a calcium-dependent processProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104Year: 2007169221692717939993
Stokkan K.A.,Yamazaki S.,Tei H.,Sakaki Y.,Menaker M.. Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feedingScience291Year: 200149049311161204
Travnickova-Bendova Z.,Cermakian N.,Reppert S.M.,Sassone-Corsi P.. Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activityProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99Year: 20027728773312032351
van Oosterhout F.,Fisher S.P.,van Diepen H.C.,Watson T.S.,Houben T.,VanderLeest H.T.,Thompson S.,Peirson S.N.,Foster R.G.,Meijer J.H.. Ultraviolet light provides a major input to non-image-forming light detection in miceCurr. Biol.22Year: 20121397140222771039
Vitaterna M.H.,Ko C.H.,Chang A.M.,Buhr E.D.,Fruechte E.M.,Schook A.,Antoch M.P.,Turek F.W.,Takahashi J.S.. The mouse Clock mutation reduces circadian pacemaker amplitude and enhances efficacy of resetting stimuli and phase-response curve amplitudeProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103Year: 20069327933216754844
Wulff K.,Gatti S.,Wettstein J.G.,Foster R.G.. Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseaseNat. Rev. Neurosci.11Year: 201058959920631712
Zaidi F.H.,Hull J.T.,Peirson S.N.,Wulff K.,Aeschbach D.,Gooley J.J.,Brainard G.C.,Gregory-Evans K.,Rizzo J.F. 3rd,Czeisler C.A.. Short-wavelength light sensitivity of circadian, pupillary, and visual awareness in humans lacking an outer retinaCurr. Biol.17Year: 20072122212818082405
Zhang X.,Odom D.T.,Koo S.H.,Conkright M.D.,Canettieri G.,Best J.,Chen H.,Jenner R.,Herbolsheimer E.,Jacobsen E.. Genome-wide analysis of cAMP-response element binding protein occupancy, phosphorylation, and target gene activation in human tissuesProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102Year: 20054459446415753290
Zhang E.E.,Liu A.C.,Hirota T.,Miraglia L.J.,Welch G.,Pongsawakul P.Y.,Liu X.,Atwood A.,Huss J.W. 3rd,Janes J.. A genome-wide RNAi screen for modifiers of the circadian clock in human cellsCell139Year: 200919921019765810

Supplemental References
Badis G.,Berger M.F.,Philippakis A.A.,Talukder S.,Gehrke A.R.,Jaeger S.A.,Chan E.T.,Metzler G.,Vedenko A.,Chen X.. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factorsScience324Year: 20091720172319443739
Buhr E.D.,Yoo S.H.,Takahashi J.S.. Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillatorsScience330Year: 201037938520947768
Conte I.,Morcillo J.,Bovolenta P.. Comparative analysis of Six 3 and Six 6 distribution in the developing and adult mouse brainDev. Dyn.234Year: 200571872515973738
Gamsby J.J.,Loros J.J.,Dunlap J.C.. A phylogenetically conserved DNA damage response resets the circadian clockJ. Biol. Rhythms24Year: 200919320219465696
Hou T.Y.,Ward S.M.,Murad J.M.,Watson N.P.,Israel M.A.,Duffield G.E.. ID2 (inhibitor of DNA binding 2) is a rhythmically expressed transcriptional repressor required for circadian clock output in mouse liverJ. Biol. Chem.284Year: 2009317353174519740747
Huang da W.,Sherman B.T.,Lempicki R.A.. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resourcesNat. Protoc.4Year: 2009445719131956
Jansson D.,Ng A.C.,Fu A.,Depatie C.,Al Azzabi M.,Screaton R.A.. Glucose controls CREB activity in islet cells via regulated phosphorylation of TORC2Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105Year: 2008101611016618626018
Jeong H.,Cohen D.E.,Cui L.,Supinski A.,Savas J.N.,Mazzulli J.R.,Yates J.R. 3rd,Bordone L.,Guarente L.,Krainc D.. Sirt1 mediates neuroprotection from mutant huntingtin by activation of the TORC1 and CREB transcriptional pathwayNat. Med.18Year: 201115916522179316
Matys V.,Kel-Margoulis O.V.,Fricke E.,Liebich I.,Land S.,Barre-Dirrie A.,Reuter I.,Chekmenev D.,Krull M.,Hornischer K.. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotesNucleic Acids Res.34Database issueYear: 2006D108D11016381825
Merico D.,Isserlin R.,Stueker O.,Emili A.,Bader G.D.. Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretationPLoS ONE5Year: 2010e1398421085593
Peirson S.N.,Butler J.N.,Foster R.G.. Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysisNucleic Acids Res.31Year: 2003e7312853650
Rahmann S.,Müller T.,Vingron M.. On the power of profiles for transcription factor binding site detectionStat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.2Year: 2003e7
Shannon P.,Markiel A.,Ozier O.,Baliga N.S.,Wang J.T.,Ramage D.,Amin N.,Schwikowski B.,Ideker T.. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networksGenome Res.13Year: 20032498250414597658
Vlieghe D.,Sandelin A.,De Bleser P.J.,Vleminckx K.,Wasserman W.W.,van Roy F.,Lenhard B.. A new generation of JASPAR, the open-access repository for transcription factor binding site profilesNucleic Acids Res.34Database issueYear: 2006D95D9716381983
Wilsbacher L.D.,Yamazaki S.,Herzog E.D.,Song E.J.,Radcliffe L.A.,Abe M.,Block G.,Spitznagel E.,Menaker M.,Takahashi J.S.. Photic and circadian expression of luciferase in mPeriod1-luc transgenic mice invivoProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99Year: 200248949411752392
Yamazaki S.,Takahashi J.S.. Real-time luminescence reporting of circadian gene expression in mammalsMethods Enzymol.393Year: 200528830115817295
Yoo S.H.,Yamazaki S.,Lowrey P.L.,Shimomura K.,Ko C.H.,Buhr E.D.,Siepka S.M.,Hong H.K.,Oh W.J.,Yoo O.J.. PERIOD2:LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissuesProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101Year: 20045339534614963227
Accession Numbers

The ArrayExpress accession number for the GeneChip data reported in this paper is E-MEXP-3933.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. Changes in Expression Level in Response to Light Observed in the SCN, Related to Figure 1

Array data showing gene level changes in expression (median probeset values) in SCN from Opn4+/+ and Opn4−/− after either a sham pulse (Sham) or 30, 60, and 120 min after a 30 min CT16 400 lux white light pulse (LP30, LP60, and LP120 respectively).


Click here for additional data file (mmc1.xlsx)

Table S2. Promoter Analysis to Identify Abundance of CRE for the Light-Responsive Transcripts as Identified in Table S1, Related to Figure 1

Transcripts listed in Table S1 were overlaid with data from Zhang et al., 2005 in order to identify CRE sites in the promoters of the genes. Gene symbol, fold change, direction of fold change, and presence of CRE sites (CRE) are indicated. (nd - no data, others - CRE absent, CRE_NoTATA - CRE more than 300bp upstream of TATA box, CRE_TATA-CRE less than/at 300 bp upstream of TATA box).


Click here for additional data file (mmc2.xlsx)

Table S3. Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction for Opn4+/+ Time Course Data, Related to Figure 1

Genes listed in Table S1 were analyzed for potential TFBS to study patterns of gene regulation as described in the experimental methods sections (main and supplementary). Cluster = cluster number from hierarchical clustering analysis, TF acc = Transcription Factor accession, TF name = Official symbol of Transcription factor, # of genes in list = number of genes in that cluster targeted by that particular transcription factor, # of genes in db = total number of genes in the database that can be targeted by that transcription factor.


Click here for additional data file (mmc3.xlsx)

Table S4. Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction for Opn4+/+ versus Opn4−/−, Related to Figure 1

Genes listed in Table S1 were analyzed for potential transcription factor binding sites to identify differential regulation of gene expression in the Opn4+/+ versus Opn4−/−. Cluster = cluster number from hierarchical clustering analysis to identify clusters of genes showing differential regulation (patterns of differential regulation indicated in the notation within the table), TF acc = Transcription Factor accession, TF name = Official symbol of Transcription factor, # of genes in list = number of genes in that cluster targeted by that particular transcription factor, # of genes in db = total number of genes in the database that can be targeted by that transcription factor.


Click here for additional data file (mmc4.xlsx)

Table S5. Real-Time PCR Primer Sequences, Related to methods
Click here for additional data file (mmc5.xlsx)

Document S1. Article plus Supplemental Information


Acknowledgments

This work was funded by grants from the Wellcome Trust (090684/Z/09/Z) and a F. Hoffmann-La Roche Neuroscience DTA grant awarded to R.G.F., M.W.H., and S.N.P., which supported R.B. and S.I.H.G. A.J. is a recipient of the F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG postdoctoral fellowship. The work was also supported by a grant from NIGMS (R01-GM087508 to G.E.D.) and an NSF REU Fellowship (to K.C.F.). We are grateful to J. Gamsby and J. Dunlap for provision of PER2::LUC MEFs and Dr. P. Nolan for provision of Per2::Luc U2OS cells. G.S., M.E., J.G.W., and S.G. are employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche.


Article Categories:
  • Article


Previous Document:  A gain-of-function mutation in DHT synthesis in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Next Document:  Clonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematop...