Document Detail


Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22198714     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
ObjectiveCT-colonography has been suggested to be less burdensome for primary colorectal cancer (CRC) screening than colonoscopy. To compare the expected and perceived burden of both in a randomised trial.Design8844 Dutch citizens aged 50-74 years were randomly invited for CRC screening with colonoscopy (n=5924) or CT-colonography (n=2920). Colonoscopy was performed after full colon lavage, or CT-colonography after limited bowel preparation (non-cathartic). All invitees were asked to complete the expected burden questionnaire before the procedure. All participants were invited to complete the perceived burden questionnaire 14 days later. Mean scores were calculated on 5-point scales.ResultsExpected burden: 2111 (36%) colonoscopy and 1199 (41%) CT-colonography invitees completed the expected burden questionnaire. Colonoscopy invitees expected the bowel preparation and screening procedure to be more burdensome than CT-colonography invitees: mean scores 3.0±1.1 vs 2.3±0.9 (p<0.001) and 3.1±1.1 vs 2.2±0.9 (p<0.001). Perceived burden: 1009/1276 (79%) colonoscopy and 801/982 (82%) CT-colonography participants completed the perceived burden questionnaire. The full screening procedure was reported as more burdensome in CT-colonography than in colonoscopy: 1.8±0.9 vs 2.0±0.9 (p<0.001). Drinking the bowel preparation resulted in a higher burden score in colonoscopy (3.0±1.3 vs 1.7±1.0, p<0.001) while related bowel movements were scored more burdensome in CT-colonography (2.0±1.0 vs 2.2±1.1, p<0.001). Most participants would probably or definitely take part in a next screening round: 96% for colonoscopy and 93% for CT-colonography (p=0.99).ConclusionIn a CRC screening programme, colonoscopy invitees expected the screening procedure and bowel preparation to be more burdensome than CT-colonography invitees. In participants, CT-colonography was scored as more burdensome than colonoscopy. Intended participation in a next screening round was comparable.
Authors:
Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Margriet C de Haan; Esther M Stoop; Patrick M Bossuyt; Maarten Thomeer; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Ernst J Kuipers; Jaap Stoker; Evelien Dekker
Related Documents :
17876244 - Introduction of an adaptor to fix y/z slides during leksell gamma knife radiosurgery to...
365094 - Computer-assisted stereotactic brain operations by means including computerized axial t...
22011584 - Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance enterography in the diagnosis of ileitis (neo-)term...
6384814 - Computed tomography plane of the target approach in computed tomographic stereotaxis.
19577354 - No role for routine chest radiography in stage i seminoma surveillance.
1749674 - Rare-mr-urography in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract abnormalities in children.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-12-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Gut     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1468-3288     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-26     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985108R     Medline TA:  Gut     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Hepatic cell-to-cell transmission of small silencing RNA can extend the therapeutic reach of RNA int...
Next Document:  NKp46-mediated killing of human and mouse hepatic stellate cells attenuates liver fibrosis.