Document Detail

Breast screen new South wales generally demonstrates good radiologic viewing conditions.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23319112     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
This study measured reading workstation monitors and the viewing environment currently available within BreastScreen New South Wales (BSNSW) centres to determine levels of adherence to national and international guidelines. Thirteen workstations from four BSNSW service centres were assessed using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18 Quality Control test pattern. Reading workstation monitor performance and ambient light levels when interpreting screening mammographic images were assessed using spectroradiometer CS-2000 and chroma meter CL-200. Overall, radiologic monitors within BSNSW were operating at good acceptable levels. Some non-adherence to published guidelines included the percentage difference in maximum luminance between pairs of primary monitors at individual workstations (61.5 % or 30.8 % of workstations depending on specific guidelines), maximum luminance (23.1 % of workstations), luminance non-uniformity (11.5 % of workstations) and minimum luminance (3.8 % of workstations). A number of ambient light measurements did not comply with the only available evidence-based guideline relevant to the methodology used in this study. Larger ambient light variations across sites are shown when monitors were switched off, suggesting that differences in ambient lighting between sites can be masked when a standard mammogram is displayed for photometric measurements. Overall, BSNSW demonstrated good adherence to available guidelines, although some non-compliance has been shown. Recently updated United Kingdom and Australian guidelines should help reduce confusion generated by the plethora and sometimes dated nature of currently available recommendations.
BaoLin Pauline Soh; Warwick Lee; Jennifer L Diffey; Mark F McEntee; Peter L Kench; Warren M Reed; Patrick C Brennan
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of digital imaging     Volume:  26     ISSN:  1618-727X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Digit Imaging     Publication Date:  2013 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-07-09     Completed Date:  2014-03-07     Revised Date:  2014-08-05    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9100529     Medline TA:  J Digit Imaging     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  759-67     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Computer Terminals / standards
Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
Lighting / methods,  standards
Mammography / instrumentation*,  standards*
New South Wales
Quality Control
Radiology Information Systems / instrumentation*,  standards*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Semi-automatic segmentation of brain tumors using population and individual information.
Next Document:  Alterations in mtDNA: A qualitative and quantitative study associated with cervical cancer developme...