Document Detail

Blood pressure rising: differences between current clinical and recommended measurement techniques.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22015319     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Strict observation to recommended blood pressure (BP) measurement technique is often not followed in outpatient clinics. The goal of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in readings obtained using typical clinic procedures versus when following recommended guidelines. One hundred and fifty patients with initial BP readings obtained through usual care above normal per the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (systolic ≥120 mm Hg and/or diastolic ≥80 mm Hg) were included in this prospective cohort study. After obtaining informed consent, BP was reassessed following the American Heart Association guidelines and compared with readings obtained through usual care. BP readings obtained using the recommended technique were significantly lower than usual care (-12.4 mm Hg systolic and -6.0 mm Hg diastolic; P < .0001, respectively). Similar differences existed for those with a preexisting diagnosis of hypertension, those without a preexisting diagnosis, nonelderly (ie, <65 years), and elderly (≥65 years). In patients with a preexisting diagnosis of hypertension (n = 92/150), patients were twice as likely to be considered at goal when following recommended technique (26% vs. 54%; P = .0002). Significant differences exist when BP readings are obtained using recommended technique. Failure to follow guidelines for measurement may have significant clinical implications on treatment decisions.
Steven E Burgess; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul A Smith; Armando Salcido; Timothy J Benton
Related Documents :
16162779 - Comparison of initial distribution volume of glucose and intrathoracic blood volume dur...
21804799 - Comparison of two ventilation modes in post-cardiac surgical patients.
21865499 - Severe vasospasm mimics hypotension after high-dose intrauterine vasopressin.
18181799 - Pressure and flow-volume distribution associated with intra-aortic balloon inflation: a...
21701139 - Anatomic predictors of retropalatal mechanical loads in patients with obstructive sleep...
1405729 - Combining in vivo volume-controlled pressure microejection with extracellular unit reco...
7859399 - Hypertension in children and adolescents.
6632379 - Graphical analysis of drug effects in the dog heart-lung preparation--with particular r...
3370539 - Euvolemic cirrhotic dogs in sodium balance maintain normal systemic hemodynamics.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-10-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1933-1711     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Soc Hypertens     Publication Date:    2011 Nov-Dec
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-17     Completed Date:  2012-02-07     Revised Date:  2012-04-23    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101312518     Medline TA:  J Am Soc Hypertens     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  484-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Department of Family Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center School of Medicine, Amarillo, TX, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Blood Pressure Determination / methods,  standards*
Blood Pressure Monitors
Equipment Design
Middle Aged
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Comment In:
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012 Mar;6(2):159   [PMID:  22305997 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Molecular mechanisms of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in systemic hypertension (SH)-possible th...
Next Document:  Ajuga remota Benth.: From ethnopharmacology to phytomedical perspective in the treatment of malaria.