Document Detail

β-Blocker treatment during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22815467     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy and the risk of being born small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth and perinatal mortality in a nationwide cohort. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective cohort study, using the Danish Fertility Database. The authors identified all pregnant women redeeming a prescription for β-blockers using the National Prescription Registry. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between exposure and our outcomes. SETTING: Register-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: 911'685 births between 1995 and 2008 obtained from the Danish Fertility Database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Being born SGA was defined as having a birth weight below the 10th percentile for the corresponding gestational week. Preterm birth was defined as birth before the 37th gestational week. Perinatal mortality was defined as either death occurring within the first 28 days of life or stillbirth. Before 2004, fetal deaths were recorded as stillbirths if they occurred after 28 weeks of gestation, but since then stillbirth is recorded for deaths after 22 gestational weeks. RESULTS: The authors identified 2459 pregnancies exposed to β-blockers. β-Blocker exposure during pregnancy was found to be associated with increased risk of SGA (adjusted OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.23), preterm birth (adjusted OR 2.26, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.52) and perinatal mortality (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.84). Analyses were adjusted for socioeconomic and maternal variables. The authors found similar risk profiles for pregnancies exposed to labetalol and for pregnancies exposed to other β-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy was associated with being born SGA, preterm birth and perinatal mortality. Our findings show that labetalol is not safer than other β-blockers during pregnancy.
Authors:
Kasper Meidahl Petersen; Espen Jimenez-Solem; Jon Traerup Andersen; Morten Petersen; Kasper Brødbæk; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Henrik Enghusen Poulsen
Related Documents :
9307857 - A prospective study of fifty-three consecutive calcium heparin treated pregnancies in p...
22296417 - Pregnancy outcome following mid-trimester amniocentesis.
15793047 - Anticoagulation in patients with mechanical valves during pregnancy.
14555837 - Warfarin-associated fetal intracranial hemorrhage: a case report.
24779247 - The association between inherited thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss in turkish...
10689017 - Minimal stimulation ivf using clomiphene citrate and oral contraceptive pill pretreatme...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-7-19
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ open     Volume:  2     ISSN:  2044-6055     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-7-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101552874     Medline TA:  BMJ Open     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Q, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMJ Open
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMJ Open
Journal ID (publisher-id): bmjopen
Journal ID (hwp): bmjopen
ISSN: 2044-6055
Publisher: BMJ Group, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
Article Information
Download PDF
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
open-access:
Received Day: 20 Month: 3 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 27 Month: 6 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 19 Month: 7 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 19 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 2 Issue: 4
E-location ID: e001185
ID: 3401834
PubMed Id: 22815467
Publisher Id: bmjopen-2012-001185
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001185

β-Blocker treatment during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based cohort study Alternate Title:Adverse pregnancy outcomes after exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy
Kasper Meidahl Petersen1
Espen Jimenez-Solem1
Jon Traerup Andersen1
Morten Petersen1
Kasper Brødbæk1
Lars Køber2
Christian Torp-Pedersen3
Henrik Enghusen Poulsen1
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Q, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3Department of Cardiology, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
Correspondence: Correspondence to Kasper Meidahl Petersen; kaspermeidahl@gmail.com

Introduction

β-Blockers are widely used in the treatment of chronic hypertension,1–4 migraine,5 essential tremor6 and various other conditions. There is contradictory evidence concerning the consequences of β-blocker treatment during pregnancy. Some studies report an association between β-blocker treatment and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns and preterm birth,4, 7–10 while others do not.2, 11 Preterm birth and being born SGA are associated with increased risk of perinatal mortality.12, 13 We set out to investigate whether the use of β-blockers during pregnancy was associated with being born SGA, preterm birth and perinatal mortality in a nationwide survey between 1995 and 2008.


Methods
Study population

We used data obtained from three nationwide registries: the Danish Fertility Database,14 the Danish National Hospital Register15 and the National Prescription Register.16 Data concerning income and educational level were obtained, respectively, from the Income Statistics Register17 and the Danish Education Register,18 both of which are provided by Statistics Denmark. In Denmark, all citizens are given a unique 10-digit identification number at birth.19 This number can be used to link information between nationwide registers.

Using the Danish Fertility Database, we identified 974 805 births between 1995 and 2008. We removed 52 603 records lacking information on pregnancy duration and 7681 records with coding errors. In addition, we excluded 2836 records with pregnancy-induced hypertension, defined as having redeemed an antihypertensive drug prescription after the 20th week of gestation, but never before. The final study population thus comprised 911 685 births.

The Danish Fertility Database contains information on maternal age, date of birth and previous births, as well as on each child's sex, gestational age, weight and mortality.14

Time of conception is based on ultrasound estimates in early pregnancy or information on last menstrual period.

Information on redeemed prescriptions was retrieved from the National Prescription Register, which holds information on date of redemption, quantity, strength and form.16 Drugs are coded in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification.

The Danish National Hospital Register contains information on diagnoses of somatic admissions and outpatients at all Danish hospitals since 197715 in accordance with the Danish revision of the 10th International Classification of Diseases system. We used primary discharge diagnoses and disregarded secondary diagnoses because secondary diagnoses in general are not validated. We identified diagnoses of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, migraine, essential tremor, arrhythmias and maternal smoking. Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia were defined as women diagnosed with O13, O14 or O15. Migraine was defined as G43 or G44, essential tremor as G250 and arrhythmias as I47, I48 and I49. Maternal smoking was defined as women diagnosed with UT00, UT20, UT21, UT22 and UT23.

Identification of exposure

We defined exposure to β-blockers as the redemption of at least two prescriptions between 6 months before conception and the 20th week of gestation. At least one of these prescriptions had to be redeemed between conception and the 20th week of gestation.

We assessed exposure to β-blockers by identifying redeemed prescriptions with ATC code C07. Furthermore, we identified the most frequently redeemed β-blockers in Denmark: labetalol (C07AG01), metoprolol (C07AB02), atenolol (C07AB03), propranolol (C07AA05), pindolol (C07AA03) and sotalol (C07AA07). Fewer than 50 pregnancies were exposed to any of the remaining β-blockers.

We divided β-blocker exposure into exposure to labetalol and exposure to other β-blockers. The latter group was formed because there were few redeemed prescriptions of individual β-blockers other than labetalol. We compared risks associated with exposure to β-blockers with exposure to methyldopa (C02AB01, C02AB02), calcium channel blockers (C08C) and ACE inhibitors (C09A) to assess possible confounding by indication.

Maternal diabetes mellitus was defined as redeeming a prescription for insulin or an insulin analogue (ATC code A10A). Furthermore, we assessed comedication with statins (ATC code C10) and antiobesity drugs (ATC code A08A). We identified pregnant women redeeming prescriptions with these drugs in order to adjust for diabetes mellitus, obesity and statin use since these women have different risk profiles for the defined outcomes.

Definition of outcomes

Being born SGA was defined as having a birth weight below the 10th percentile for the corresponding gestational week. Preterm birth was defined as birth before the 37th gestational week. Perinatal mortality was defined as either death occurring within the first 28 days of life or stillbirth. Before 2004, fetal deaths were recorded as stillbirths if they occurred after 28 weeks of gestation, but since then stillbirth is recorded for deaths after 22 gestational weeks.20

Statistical analyses

Data were managed and analysed using SAS V.9.2 (SAS Institute Inc.). Logistic regression models were developed for dichotomous variables adjusted for maternal age, year of conception, annual household income, parity and educational level (model 1). Maternal age was divided into five groups: <20, 21–25, 26–30, 31–35 and >35 years (no missing values). Annual household income at year of birth was divided into quartiles (1266 missing values). Subjects were divided into quartiles according to the number of previous births, including stillbirths (37 missing values): 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 births. Year of conception was ordered into three categories (1994–1998, 1999–2003 and 2004–2008). Educational level was divided into tertiles by highest level of education achieved at the year of birth. For missing information, we used information from the following calendar year (32 745 missing values).

We constructed a separate logistic regression model (model 2), including the socioeconomic variables in model 1 and additional confounding variables: smoking status, comedication (yes/no) with statins, antiobesity drugs, insulin and insulin analogues, and diagnoses of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. These confounders were included in model 2 due to the high frequency of missing data because information on smoking and diagnoses of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia were not available for the years 1995 and 2008. Maternal smoking was divided into four categories according to the number of cigarettes smoked daily (0, 1–10, 11–20 and >20).

When estimating the risk of perinatal mortality, analyses were further adjusted for previous stillbirths. ORs are presented with 95% CIs. For description of basic characteristics, we used frequencies with percentages. We used χ2 tests to analyse differences in the proportions of the different classes of categorical baseline characteristics. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. All tests were two-sided.

In addition, we carried out a propensity score-matched regression analysis to consolidate our findings. We calculated a propensity score for the likelihood of redeeming a β-blocker during pregnancy by multivariate logistic regression conditional on baseline covariates. Using the Greedy matching macro (http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/biostat/upload/gmatch.sas), we matched each case to four controls on the basis of the propensity score (table 1). We did not match on diagnoses of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia since a large fraction of these cases redeemed β-blocker prescriptions.


Results

Table 1 presents maternal characteristics in β-blocker-exposed and unexposed women (number and percentage of pregnancies). We identified 2381 pregnancies exposed to only one β-blocker, 1452 exposed to labetalol only and 929 exposed to other β-blockers. Ninety-eight pregnancies were exposed to more than one β-blocker. We found 515 pregnancies exposed to methyldopa, 86 pregnancies to calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and 48 pregnancies exposed to ACE inhibitors. Women exposed to β-blockers during pregnancy were older, had higher income and higher parity than unexposed women. The proportions of women redeeming prescriptions for statins, antiobesity preparations and insulins were higher among the β-blocker-exposed group. The proportion of pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia was higher among β-blocker-exposed pregnancies. There was no difference in smoking prevalence between β-blocker-exposed and unexposed women (table 1).

Women redeeming labetalol prescriptions were older, had a higher education level and a higher prevalence of pre-eclampsia and smoking than women exposed to other β-blockers (table 2). The proportion of women redeeming prescriptions for insulin was larger among the labetalol-exposed group. There was no difference in income or comedication with statins and antiobesity preparations between the two groups. Diagnoses of migraine and arrhythmias were more common among women exposed to any other β-blocker. Women exposed to other β-blockers had higher parity than those exposed to labetalol.

Table 3 presents ORs with 95% CIs for SGA, preterm birth and perinatal death for exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy.

Small for gestational age

We found 93 662 children born SGA in the unexposed population (table 3). There were 446 children born SGA among pregnancies exposed to some kind of β-blocker. We found a higher proportion of SGA among women exposed to β-blockers compared with unexposed women. Women exposed to labetalol or to other β-blockers had similarly higher ORs than unexposed women (table 3).

Preterm birth

We identified 109 163 preterm births in the unexposed population (table 3). There were 697 preterm births among pregnancies exposed to β-blockers. We found an association between preterm birth and β-blocker exposure compared with unexposed women. Those exposed to labetalol or to other β-blockers had similarly higher ORs than unexposed women (table 3).

Perinatal mortality

We identified 6048 perinatal deaths in the unexposed population (table 3). There were 44 perinatal deaths among infants exposed to β-blockers. We found a higher rate of perinatal mortality among women exposed to β-blockers (table 3).

When stratifying for different β-blockers, we found 30 perinatal deaths among labetalol-exposed pregnancies. Labetalol exposure was associated with increased risk of perinatal mortality (table 3).

We identified 13 perinatal deaths among pregnancies exposed to other β-blockers. Exposure to other β-blockers was found to be significantly associated with perinatal mortality in the unadjusted model and model 1. However, adjusting our analysis for additional confounding variables (model 2) rendered the association statistically insignificant (table 3).

Other analyses

We identified 515 pregnancies exposed to methyldopa (table 3). We found 61 children born SGA, 216 preterm births and four perinatal deaths among these pregnancies. We found a positive association between children born SGA and exposure to methyldopa, and between methyldopa exposure and increased risk of preterm birth. Exposure to methyldopa during pregnancy was not significantly associated with perinatal mortality (table 3).

We found 86 pregnancies exposed to CCBs (table 3). These included 17 children born SGA, 18 preterm births and one perinatal death. We found an association between exposure to CCBs and children born SGA in all models.

Additionally, we found an association between exposure to CCBs and increased risk of preterm birth in all models. As with methyldopa, exposure to CCBs during pregnancy was not found to be associated with perinatal mortality (table 3). Analyses for exposure to ACE inhibitors were not performed since we identified only 48 pregnancies exposed to them.

Post hoc we analysed the effect of exposure to all β-blockers using a propensity score-matched control group (table 1) and found similar results to those of the primary analyses: SGA, OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.71 to 2.19); preterm birth, OR 2.40 (95% CI 2.16 to 2.67); perinatal mortality, OR 3.22 (95% CI 2.15 to 4.82).


Discussion

In the present study, which we believe to be the largest of its kind to date, we found an association between redeeming prescriptions of β-blockers during pregnancy and being born SGA, preterm birth and perinatal mortality. In addition, we found an association between redeeming prescriptions of methyldopa and CCBs, being born SGA and preterm birth. Methyldopa and CCBs were not found to be associated with perinatal mortality.

We found exposure to any β-blocker to be associated with being born SGA. Our results are in accordance with a recent study reporting increased risk of being born SGA among pregnancies exposed to selective β-blockers (OR 6.00, 95% CI 1.06 to 33.87) and labetalol (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.88).9 Labetalol is generally considered safe for use during pregnancy.1, 8, 21

Exposure to β-blockers was found to be associated with preterm birth. When stratifying for different β-blockers, we found an increased risk of preterm birth after exposure to labetalol, and all other β-blockers, respectively.

We found an association between exposure to β-blockers and perinatal mortality. When stratifying for different β-blockers, we found this association to be statistically significant for exposure to labetalol and other β-blockers. When adjusting our analysis for maternal comorbidity, comedication and smoking, only labetalol was found to be associated with perinatal mortality.

Methyldopa is mainly used to treat chronic hypertension during pregnancy as first-line therapy.1 Previous studies did not find any associations between methyldopa exposure and being born SGA or preterm birth.1, 3 Methyldopa has not been found to have effects on placental haemodynamics.1 However, a recent case–control study reported an increased risk of being born SGA among pregnancies exposed to centrally acting adrenergic agents during the second and third trimesters9: OR 1.70 (95% CI 1.00 to 2.89). We found that methyldopa exposure was associated with being born SGA and preterm birth. This could be due to indicative antihypertensive treatment with methyldopa in pregnant women with diabetes or pregnancy-related diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes among methyldopa-exposed pregnancies was found to be higher: 11.1% compared with 3.9% among β-blocker-exposed pregnancies. Increased risk of preterm birth was still seen after adjusting our analyses for additional confounding variables in model 2. We found no association between exposure to methyldopa and perinatal mortality. These findings are consistent with those of a previous study.3

CCBs are considered to be safe during pregnancy.3, 22 We found that exposure to CCBs was associated with being born SGA and with preterm birth. The risk of being born SGA and preterm of birth remained after adjusting our analyses for additional confounding variables in model 2. We found no statistically significant association between CCB exposure during pregnancy and perinatal mortality.

We chose to analyse two outcomes previously reported to be associated with β-blocker exposure during pregnancy—SGA and preterm birth1, 10, 23—that have been associated with increased perinatal mortality in previous studies.12, 13 Therefore, we investigated the risk of perinatal mortality among β-blocker-exposed pregnancies. We compared risks associated with exposure to β-blockers with exposure to methyldopa and CCBs to assess possible confounding by indication. Our analyses show a similar risk of being born SGA and an increased risk of preterm birth for all recommended agents during pregnancy. There are various possible explanations for this finding. It is possible that the underlying indication for treatment, maternal disease, is the true risk factor. Possible maternal diseases include hypertension, either predating or complicating pregnancy. Accordingly, we were not able to rule out a potential effect of maternal disease on perinatal outcomes.

We found an association between exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy and perinatal mortality. This association was not found for exposure to methyldopa and CCBs, which might be due to the small number of cases.

We believe that the similar risks found for exposure to the various β-blockers and SGA, preterm birth and perinatal mortality are a class effect. This seems to be true in spite of statistically significant differences in the basic characteristics of women exposed to labetalol and those exposed to other β-blockers (table 2). After adjustments were made for these variables, we found comparable risk profiles for labetalol-exposed pregnancies and pregnancies exposed to other β-blockers. Most β-blockers are known to cross the placenta,21, 24 and effects on placental haemodynamics have been observed in both human and animal studies. A mechanism has been proposed of diminished placental blood flow due to the selective vasoconstriction of placental vessels by β-blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.24 This effect on placental haemodynamics could explain growth retardation of fetuses exposed to β-blockers during pregnancy and might result in children being born SGA and preterm.

We defined exposure as redemption of at least two prescriptions between 6 months before conception and the 20th week of gestation. At least one of these prescriptions had to be redeemed between conception and 20th week of gestation. We believe that this model increases the probability of identifying continuous use that extends into pregnancy.

The rate of perinatal mortality in Denmark is low (table 3).25 A large number of women exposed to β-blockers, methyldopa and CCBs are therefore needed to identify a possible risk increase associated with these outcomes. Our cohort comprises all births in Denmark between 1995 and 2008. This minimises confounding due to race, educational level and other socioeconomic factors. The national Danish registers cover the entire nation and are considered valid. As part of the national healthcare reimbursement scheme, Danish pharmacies are required by law to register all redeemed prescriptions. Approximately 97.5% of all redeemed prescriptions are registered in the Danish Prescription register.16 Our study includes data on exposure to β-blockers based on information on prescriptions paid for at the pharmacy, and not only prescribed by the physician, thereby increasing the probability of exposure. Furthermore, our study was not confounded by recall bias since information was recorded prospectively. The Danish Fertility Database contains more than 99% of all births during the study period.14

Limitations of our study include missing information on maternal weight and alcohol consumption. We were unable to adjust for treatment indication and severity of maternal disease. Given the study design, we were not able to address this issue further, nor were we able to rule out confounding by indication, the underlying maternal disease, as a possible explanation for our findings. Consequently, we were unable to differentiate between a possible class effect of β-blockers and the effect of the underlying maternal disease.

Unfortunately, information on diagnoses of essential hypertension was not available since these are known risk factors for our primary outcomes.

The prevalence of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in the cohort is based on primary discharge diagnoses from hospital admissions. We did not use secondary diagnoses since these in general are not validated. We estimated exposure from National Prescription Registry data, which contain information on all redeemed prescriptions.16 Overestimation of exposure is therefore a possibility since we cannot adjust for a potential lack of compliance. However, in a study by Olesen et al26 conducted in a cohort of pregnant Danish women in the county of North Jutland, compliance with prescribed β-blockers was estimated to be complete, strengthening the validity of our analyses. Furthermore, overestimation of exposure would bias the estimates towards unity.

There is a general consensus that labetalol is safer than other β-blockers during pregnancy, and this drug is rapidly becoming the first-line choice in conditions, such as chronic hypertension during pregnancy.21, 23 We found an association between redeeming prescriptions for β-blockers and being born SGA, preterm birth and perinatal mortality. Risk profiles for pregnancies exposed to labetalol and to other β-blockers were similar. The increasing use and uncertainty of effects and possible side effects of treatment with β-blockers during pregnancy call for further studies to validate our findings.



Notes

To cite: Meidahl Petersen K, Jimenez-Solem E, Andersen JT, et al. β-Blocker treatment during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001185. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001185

Contributors: KMP, EJ-S, JTA and HEP conceptualised the study. MP, KB, LK and CT-P assisted with the study design. KMP preformed the analyses assisted by EJ-S, and JTA, MP, KB, LK, CT-P and HEP assisted in the interpretation. KMP, EJ-S, JTA, MP, KB, LK, CT-P and HEP wrote and revised the final manuscript. Figure design was done by KMP, EJ-S, JTA, MP, KB, LK, CT-P and HEP. All authors approved the final version to be published.

Funding:The project was sponsored by the Capital Region of Copenhagen.

Competing interests: None.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: The original manuscript submitted includes all available data. No additional unpublished data are available.

References
1. Sibai BM. Treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. N Engl J MedYear: 1996;335:257–658657243
2. Magee LA,Ornstein MP,von Dadelszen P. Fortnightly review: management of hypertension in pregnancy. BMJYear: 1999;318:1332–610323823
3. Afifi Y,Churchill D. Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Curr Pharm DesYear: 2003;9:1745–5312871206
4. Magee LA,Duley L. Oral beta-blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst RevYear: 2003;(3):CD00286312917933
5. Lyons KE,Pahwa R. Pharmacotherapy of essential tremor: an overview of existing and upcoming agents. CNS DrugsYear: 2008;22:1037–4518998741
6. Modi S,Lowder DM. Medications for migraine prophylaxis. Am Fam PhysicianYear: 2006;73:72–816417067
7. Sibai BM,Gonzalez AR,Mabie WC,et al. Comparison of labetalol plus hospitalization versus hospitalization alone in the management of preeclampsia remote from term. Obstet GynecolYear: 1987;70:323–73627579
8. Magee LA,Elran E,Bull SB,et al. Risks and benefits of beta-receptor blockers for pregnancy hypertension: overview of the randomized trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod BiolYear: 2000;88:15–2610659912
9. Nakhai-Pour HR,Rey E,Berard A. Antihypertensive medication use during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations or small-for-gestational-age newborns. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod ToxicolYear: 2010;89:147–5420437474
10. Lydakis C,Lip GY,Beevers M,et al. Atenolol and foetal growth in pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am J HypertensYear: 1999;12:541–710371362
11. Abalos E,Duley L,Steyn DW,et al. Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst RevYear: 2007;(1):CD00225217253478
12. Zeitlin J,El AM,Jarreau PH,et al. Impact of foetal growth restriction on mortality and morbidity in a very preterm birth cohort. J PediatrYear: 2010;157:733–920955846
13. Challis JR,Lye SJ,Gibb W,et al. Understanding preterm labor. Ann N Y Acad SciYear: 2001;943:225–3411594542
14. Knudsen LB. The Danish fertility database. Dan Med BullYear: 1998;45:221–59587707
15. Andersen TF,Madsen M,Jorgensen J,et al. The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med BullYear: 1999;46:263–810421985
16. Gaist D,Sorensen HT,Hallas J. The Danish prescription registries. Dan Med BullYear: 1997;44:445–89377907
17. Baadsgaard M,Quitzau J. Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public HealthYear: 2011;39(7 Suppl):103–521775365
18. Jensen VM,Rasmussen AW. Danish education registers. Scand J Public HealthYear: 2011;39(7 Suppl):91–421775362
19. Pedersen CB,Gotzsche H,Moller JO,et al. The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med BullYear: 2006;53:441–917150149
20. Knudsen LB,Børlum Kristensen F. Monitoring perinatal mortality and perinatal care with a national register: content and usage of the Danish Medical Birth Register. Community MedYear: 1986;8:29–363698562
21. Karthikeyan VJ,Lip GY. Hypertension in pregnancy: pathophysiology and management strategies. Curr Pharm DesYear: 2007;13:2567–7917897001
22. Magee LA,Schick B,Donnenfeld AE,et al. The safety of calcium channel blockers in human pregnancy: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet GynecolYear: 1996;174:823–88633650
23. Podymow T,August P. Update on the use of antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. HypertensionYear: 2008;51:960–918259046
24. Lennestal R,Otterblad OP,Kallen B. Maternal use of antihypertensive drugs in early pregnancy and delivery outcome, notably the presence of congenital heart defects in the infants. Eur J Clin PharmacolYear: 2009;65:615–2519198819
25. World Health OrganizationLevels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2011. Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency for Child Mortality Estimation. World Health Organization, Year: 2011http://www.who.int/child_adolescent_health/documents/child/childmortality_booklet_2011.pdf Ref type: online source.
26. Olesen C,Sondergaard C,Thrane N,et al. Do pregnant women report use of dispensed medications?EpidemiologyYear: 2001;12:497–50111505166

Tables
[TableWrap ID: tbl1] Table 1 

Basic characteristics for pregnancies exposed to β-blockers compared with unexposed pregnancies and propensity score-matched pregnancies


Characteristics β-Blocker exposed (n=2459), n (%) β-Blocker unexposed (n=909 228), n (%) p Value* Propensity matched, (n=9662), n (%) p Value*
Educational level
 Low 739 (30.05) 311 600 (35.45) <0.001 2965 (30.69) 0.991
 Medium 972 (39.53) 285 450 (32.47) 3883 (40.19)
 High 707 (28.75) 279 431 (31.79) 2814 (29.12)
Annual household income (GBP)
 0–36 770 509 (23.99) 226 228 (24.84) <0.001 1924 (19.91) 0.989
 36 771–52 703 594 (24.16) 227 195 (24.96) 2337 (24.19)
 52 704–74 699 662 (26.92) 227 089 (24.94) 2631 (27.23)
 ≥74 700 693 (28.18) 227 448 (24.98) 2770 (28.67)
Parity
 1 900 (36.60) 394 661 (43.29) <0.001 3487 (28.87) 0.998
 2 918 (37.33) 338 989 (37.18) 3658 (30.28)
 3 455 (18.50) 129 482 (14.20) 1788 (14.80)
 >3 186 (7.56) 46 057 (5.05) 729 (6.04)
Age (years)
 <20 18 (0.73) 26 321 (2.89) <0.001 68 (0.56) 1.000
 21–25 174 (7.07) 147 298 (16.16) 699 (5.79)
 26–30 700 (28.47) 350 105 (38.40) 2757 (22.82)
 31–35 930 (37.82) 281 154 (30.84) 3665 (30.34)
 >35 637 (24.90) 104 339 (11.44) 2473 (20.47)
Daily cigarettes
 0 1548 (80.29) 572 642 (81.15) 0.427 6140 (81.81) 0.385
 1–10 251 (13.02) 90 033 (12.76) 913 (12.16)
 11–20 114 (5.19) 36201 (5.13) 394 (5.25)
 >20 15 (0.78) 4849 (0.69) 59 (0.79)
Statins
 Used 5 (0.20) 111 (0.01) <0.001 14 (0.14) 0.492
 Not used 2454 (99.8) 909 115 (99.99) 9648 (99.86)
Antiobesity preparations (A10)
 Used 9 (0.40) 1539 (0.17) 0.018 23 (0.24) 0.251
 Not used 2450 (99.6) 907 687 (99.83) 9639 (99.76)
Insulins and analogues
 Used 101 (4.11) 4208 (0.46) <0.001 412 (4.14) 0.782
 Not used 2358 (95.89) 905 018 (99.53) 9250 (95.74)
Pre-eclampsia diagnosis (O13–O15)
 Yes 99 (4.03) 7806 (0.86) <0.001
 No 2360 (95.97) 901 420 (99.14)

*χ2 tests were used to assess the overall p value for the group comparison.

Information on smoking was only available for 1996–2007.


[TableWrap ID: tbl2] Table 2 

Basic characteristics for pregnancies exposed to labetalol compared with pregnancies exposed to other β-blockers


Characteristics Labetalol (n=1452), n (%) Other β-blockers (n=929), n (%) p Value*
Educational level
 Low 391 (26.93) 321 (34.55) <0.001
 Medium 571 (39.33) 369 (39.72)
 High 462 (31.82) 226 (24.33)
Annual household income (GBP)
 0–36 770 202 (13.91) 289 (31.11) 0.138
 36 771–52 703 223 (15.36) 357 (38.43)
 52 704–74 699 228 (15.70) 413 (44.46)
 ≥74 700 275 (19.94) 393 (42.30)
Parity
 0 512 (35.26) 363 (39.07) 0.004
 1 586 (40.36) 308 (33.15)
 2 256 (17.63) 179 (19.27)
 ≥3 98 (6.75) 79 (8.50)
Age (years)
 <20 7 (0.58) 10 (1.08) <0.001
 21–25 69 (4.75) 97 (10.44)
 26–30 406 (27.96) 275 (29.60)
 31–35 586 (40.36) 314 (33.79)
 >35 384 (26.45) 233 (25.08)
Daily cigarettes
 0 933 (64.26) 565 (60.82) <0.001
 1–10 130 (8.95) 112 (12.06)
 11–20 44 (3.03) 62 (6.67)
 >20 9 (6.19) 6 (0.65)
Antiobesity drugs
 Yes 5 (0.34) 9 (0.97) 0.052
 No 1447 (99.66) 920 (99.03)
Statins
 Yes 5 (0.34) 1 (0.10) 0.261
 No 1447 (99.66) 928 (99.90)
Insulins and analogues
 Yes 83 (5.72) 16 (1.72) <0.001
 No 1369 (94.28) 913 (92.28)
Migraine
 Yes 26 (1.79) 46 (4.95) <0.001
 No 1426 (98.21) 883 (95.05)
Pre-eclampsia diagnosis
 Yes 74 (5.10) 21 (2.26) 0.001
 No 1378 (94.90) 908 (97.84)
Arrhythmia
 Yes 23 (1.58) 82 (8.83) <0.001
 No 1429 (98.42) 847 (91.17)
Essential tremor
 Yes 3 (0.33) 0.030
 No 1452 (100) 926 (99.67)

*χ2 tests were used to assess the overall p value for the group comparison.

Information on smoking was only available for 1996–2007.


[TableWrap ID: tbl3] Table 3 

ORs with 95% CIs for SGA, preterm birth and perinatal death for exposure to β-blockers during pregnancy


Exposure N (%) Crude Adjusted (model 1) Adjusted (model 2)
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)*
SGA
 Unexposed (n=909 226) 93 662 (10.30) Reference Reference Reference
 All β-blockers (n=2459) 446 (18.14) 1.93 (1.74 to 2.14) 1.99 (1.79 to 2.21) 1.97 (1.75 to 2.23)
  Labetalol only (n=1452) 258 (17.77) 1.88 (1.64 to 2.15) 1.95 (1.70 to 2.24) 2.02 (1.72 to 2.37)
  Other β-blockers (n=929) 179 (19.27) 2.08 (1.76 to 2.44) 2.11 (1.79 to 2.49) 2.01 (1.66 to 2.43)
  Methyldopa (n=515) 61 (11.84) 1.17 (0.89 to 1.53) 1.32 (1.01 to 1.73) 1.43 (1.04 to 1.96)
  CCBs (n=86) 21 (24.42) 2.30 (1.42 to 3.73) 2.24 (1.36 to 3.67) 1.88 (1.02 to 3.49)
Preterm birth
 Unexposed (n=909 226) 109 163 (12.01) Reference Reference Reference
 All β-blockers (n=2459) 697 (28.34) 2.9 (2.66 to 3.14) 2.71 (2.48 to 2.97) 2.26 (2.03 to 2.52)
  Labetalol only (n=1452) 473 (32.58) 3.54 (3.17 to 3.95) 3.33 (2.98 to 3.72) 2.74 (2.39 to 3.13)
  Other β-blockers (n=929) 206 (22.17) 2.08 (1.78 to 2.43) 1.93 (1.65 to 2.26) 1.69 (1.41 to 2.03)
  Methyldopa (n= 515) 216 (41.94) 5.29 (4.44 to 6.31) 5.03 (4.21 to 6.01) 4.21 (3.38 to 5.23)
  CCBs (n=86) 26 (30.23) 2.55 (1.63 to 3.99) 2.50 (1.60 to 3.89) 2.15 (1.26 to 3.67)
Perinatal mortality
 Unexposed (n=909 226) 6048 (0.67) Reference Reference Reference
 All β-blockers (n=2459) 44 (1.79) 2.72 (2.02 to 3.67) 2.69 (1.98 to 3.65) 1.89 (1.25 to 2.84)
  Labetalol only (n=1452) 30 (2.07) 3.15 (2.19 to 4.52) 3.24 (2.25 to 4.67) 2.08 (1.26 to 3.44)
  Other β-blockers (n=929) 13 (1.39) 2.12 (1.22 to 3.66) 1.92 (1.08 to 3.40) 1.72 (0.85 to 3.48)
  Methyldopa (n=515) 4 (0.78) 1.15 (0.43 to 3.07) 1.16 (0.43 to 3.12) 0.35 (0.05 to 2.50)
  CCBs (n=86) 1 (1.16) 1.78 (0.25 to 12.57) 2.00 (0.28 to 14.83) 3.26 (0.45 to 23.77)

Analyses are adjusted for maternal age, household income, educational level, parity, birth year and prior stillbirths.

*Model 2 is furthermore adjusted for smoking and comedication with statins, antiobesity preparations, insulins and diagnoses of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. The cohort in model 2 comprises all births between 1996 and 2007 (n=778 394).



Article Categories:
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    • Research
Article Categories:
  • 1506
  • 1723
  • 1692
  • 1694
  • 1729


Previous Document:  Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary care programme fo...
Next Document:  Biomarkers of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and DNA damage: a cross-sectional ...