Document Detail


Birth outcomes and the effectiveness of prenatal care.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9460487     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate pregnant women's self-selection effects on the estimation of birthweight production function. A particular emphasis is placed on assessing the effectiveness of prenatal care as a major medical input in the birthweight production function. DATA SOURCES: Primary data compiled from birth and abortion certificates for the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1984. Several area-specific socioeconomic variables were also employed from the Area Resource File 1984; Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Local Agency Directory; and the family planning clinics data by the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). STUDY DESIGN: Two types of self-selection effects are defined: selection effect due to sample censoring from the resolution of pregnancies as live births or induced abortions; and selection effect due to the use of prenatal care as an endogenous variable. Race- and location-specific birthweight production functions are estimated using models with and without correction for self-selection effects. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The self-selection effect in the resolution of pregnancies is race-specific, being significant for African American women. The effectiveness of prenatal care in birthweight production is underestimated substantially by the selection bias from the use of prenatal care, and overestimated by the selection bias from pregnancy resolutions. On average, the overall estimated effectiveness of prenatal care is over five times higher after controlling for the selection effects. CONCLUSIONS: Self-selection effects could be a very serious problem in measuring the effectiveness of birthweight determinants in general. The overall effectiveness of prenatal care, in particular, tends to be significantly biased downward without controlling for selection effects. The significance and scale of the bias depends crucially on specific data and cohorts of the population investigated.
Authors:
G G Liu
Related Documents :
8058867 - Factors related to fear of marriage.
8172517 - Affective care: rhetoric or reality.
2296507 - Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses.
20469027 - Good prenatal care: what are the priorities?
17957177 - Guidelines for hurricane and disaster preparation for animal facilities.
16128477 - Does advanced life support provide benefits to patients?: a literature review.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Health services research     Volume:  32     ISSN:  0017-9124     ISO Abbreviation:  Health Serv Res     Publication Date:  1998 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-02-26     Completed Date:  1998-02-26     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0053006     Medline TA:  Health Serv Res     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  805-23     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abortion, Induced / statistics & numerical data
Adolescent
Adult
Birth Weight*
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Models, Statistical
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome*
Prenatal Care / standards*,  statistics & numerical data
Selection Bias
Virginia
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  An organizational field approach to resource environments in healthcare: comparing entries of hospit...
Next Document:  Practice variation in the use of interventions in high-risk obstetrics.