Document Detail

Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21132335     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Treatment of chronic low back pain due to degenerative lumbar spine conditions often involves fusion of the symptomatic level. A known risk of this procedure is accelerated adjacent level degeneration. Motion preservation devices have been designed to provide stabilization to the symptomatic motion segment while preserving some physiologic motion. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in relative range of motion caused as a result of application of two non-fusion, dynamic stabilization devices: the Universal Clamp (UC) and the Wallis device. Nine fresh, frozen human lumbar spines (L1-Sacrum) were tested in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with a custom spine simulator. Specimens were tested in four conditions: (1) intact, (2) the Universal Clamp implanted at L3-4 (UC), (3) the UC with a transverse rod added (UCTR), and (4) the Wallis device implanted at L3-4. Total range of motion at 7.5 N-m was determined for each device and compared to intact condition. The UC device (with or without a transverse rod) restricted motion in all planes more than the Wallis. The greatest restriction was observed in flexion. The neutral position of the L3-4 motion segment shifted toward extension with the UC and UCTR. Motion at the adjacent levels remained similar to that observed in the intact spine for all three constructs. These results suggest that the UC device may be an appropriate dynamic stabilization device for degenerative lumbar disorders.
Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Related Documents :
25174255 - The effects of seat height and foot placement on lumbar spine load during sit-to-stand ...
25438945 - Four days of visual contrast deprivation reveals limits of neuronal adaptation.
16347435 - Diel vertical movements of the cyanobacterium oscillatoria terebriformis in a sulfide-r...
10681425 - Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical...
7367175 - Inhibition of--but not between--orientation detectors: a theoretical note on illusions ...
1673245 - Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2010-12-04
Journal Detail:
Title:  European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society     Volume:  20     ISSN:  1432-0932     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur Spine J     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-31     Completed Date:  2011-06-30     Revised Date:  2014-03-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9301980     Medline TA:  Eur Spine J     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  289-96     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Analysis of Variance
Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
Internal Fixators
Lumbar Vertebrae / physiology,  surgery*
Orthopedic Procedures / instrumentation*,  methods*
Range of Motion, Articular / physiology*
Grant Support

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The use of traditional and newer calcineurin inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease.
Next Document:  Molecular characterization of rare G12P[6] rotavirus isolates closely related to G12 strains from th...