Document Detail

Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafting in dialysis patients with multivessel disease.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20961826     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to compare mortality in dialysis patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) or single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting and to quantify the magnitude of the BITA grafting benefit for survival.
METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2008, 656 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (99.1% by an off-pump technique). Fifty-six of these patients with chronic dialysis and multivessel disease were retrospectively compared with respect to surgical technique: BITA (n = 32) or SITA (n = 23) grafting. End points were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (mean follow-up duration, 2.5 years). In an attempt to minimize the selection bias, we created propensity scores based on 13 preoperative factors that would affect the surgeon's decision about operative strategy; these factors were used for regression adjustment (C statistic, 0.914).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, prevalence of diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease, and logistic EuroSCORE. All patients under-went revascularization with the off-pump technique, with no conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. All arterial conduits were harvested with a skeletonization technique in all cases. Except for 1 patient who received a SITA, internal thoracic arteries were used as in situ grafts in both groups. Complete revascularization was achieved in all patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates free from all-cause mortality for BITA grafting versus SITA grafting were 94% versus 73%, 72% versus 42%, and 52% versus 28%, respectively (P = .01, logrank test). For survival free from cardiovascular mortality, the respective rates were 100% versus 90%, 80% versus 77%, and 80% versus 58% (P = .06). After propensity score adjustment, BITA grafting was significantly associated with lower risks for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.81; P = .02) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.93; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: In situ skeletonized BITA grafting provides better long-term survival in dialysis patients with multivessel disease.
Takeshi Kinoshita; Tohru Asai; Yoshitaka Murakami; Osamu Nishimura; Norihiko Hiramatsu; Tomoaki Suzuki; Atsushi Kambara; Keiji Matsubayashi
Related Documents :
16076276 - Vascular engineering for bypass surgery.
11877696 - Success of thrombolysis as a predictor of outcome in acute thrombosis of popliteal aneu...
18677296 - Relationship between the diameter of the vein graft and postoperative ankle brachial pr...
6689786 - Percutaneous arterial grafting.
3625886 - The multiple sequential distal bypass graft: seven-year follow-up.
22837856 - Evaluation of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for pulmonary...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The heart surgery forum     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1522-6662     ISO Abbreviation:  Heart Surg Forum     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-21     Completed Date:  2011-04-07     Revised Date:  2011-08-05    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100891112     Medline TA:  Heart Surg Forum     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  E280-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cause of Death / trends
Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
Coronary Artery Disease / complications,  mortality,  surgery*
Follow-Up Studies
Japan / epidemiology
Kidney Failure, Chronic / complications,  mortality,  therapy*
Mammary Arteries / transplantation*
Middle Aged
Renal Dialysis*
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate / trends

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Recombinant activated factor VII for postoperative hemorrhage following repair of acute type A aorti...
Next Document:  Outcome evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery applying the EuroSCORE in a Caribbean ...