Document Detail


Better to exist: a reply to Benatar.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19043113     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
A recent exchange on Benatar's book Better never to have been between Doyal and Benatar discusses Benatar's bold claim that people should not be brought into existence. Here, I expand the discussion of original position that the exchange focused on. I also discuss the asymmetries, between benefit and harm and between existence and non-existence, upon which Benatar's bold claim rests. In both discussions, I show how Benatar's bold claim can be rejected.
Authors:
S D Baum
Related Documents :
16158553 - Like no. 1 mike leavitt, most atop the 100 most powerful wield their influence from d.c...
18341543 - Deliberate self-harm within an international community sample of young people: comparat...
12574713 - Research endeavours into suicide: a need to shift the emphasis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  34     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2008 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-01     Completed Date:  2009-04-27     Revised Date:  2009-05-01    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  875-6     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. sbaum@psu.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Human Rights*
Humans
Reproductive Behavior / ethics*
Value of Life*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):328-9   [PMID:  19407042 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don't like it and why maybe we s...
Next Document:  The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health a...