Document Detail


Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: An analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21216520     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Participatory processes in general and also in relation to managing landscape issues are gathering importance mostly due to arguments surrounding legitimacy and effectiveness in decision-making. The main aim of this research, based on a transaction costs perspective, is to present an integrated analytical framework in order to determine individual efforts (time, money), benefits and risks of participants in landscape co-management processes. Furthermore a reflection on the analytical approach developed and arising lessons to be learned for landscape co-management are presented. In the analytical framework benefit-components comprise of factors such as 'contributing to landscape maintenance/development and nature protection', 'representing one's interest group', 'co-deciding on relevant topics', 'providing and broadening one's knowledge' and 'building networks'. The risks of participation are related to a lack of information and agreements, missing support and actual decision-making power. The analytical framework is applied to two case studies in Austria: an EU LIFE-Nature project and a Cultural Landscape Project of the Provincial Government of Lower Austria. Analysis of the effort-benefit-relations provides an indication for a more effective design of co-management. Although the processes are rated as quite adequate, there is a low willingness of participants to commit additional time to co-management processes. In contrast to the Cultural Landscape Project, in the LIFE-Nature project, professionally involved persons participate next to partly and full volunteers. These uneven conditions of participation and an unfair distribution of transaction costs, jeopardize the promising chances co-management bears for landscape governance.
Authors:
Barbara Enengel; Marianne Penker; Andreas Muhar; Rachael Williams
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-01-08
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of environmental management     Volume:  92     ISSN:  1095-8630     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Environ. Manage.     Publication Date:  2011 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-01     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401664     Medline TA:  J Environ Manage     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1256-67     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Doctoral School Sustainable Development, BOKU, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Application of the target fish community model to an urban river system.
Next Document:  Evaluation of hexavalent chromium removal in a continuous biological filter with the use of central ...