|Bedside measurement of changes in lung impedance to monitor alveolar ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts by electrical impedance tomography during a positive end-expiratory pressure trial in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20509966 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|INTRODUCTION: As it becomes clear that mechanical ventilation can exaggerate lung injury, individual titration of ventilator settings is of special interest. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been proposed as a bedside, regional monitoring tool to guide these settings. In the present study we evaluate the use of ventilation distribution change maps (DeltafEIT maps) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with or without lung disorders during a standardized decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial.
METHODS: Functional EIT (fEIT) images and PaO2/FiO2 ratios were obtained at four PEEP levels (15 to 10 to 5 to 0 cm H2O) in 14 ICU patients with or without lung disorders. Patients were pressure-controlled ventilated with constant driving pressure. fEIT images made before each reduction in PEEP were subtracted from those recorded after each PEEP step to evaluate regional increase/decrease in tidal impedance in each EIT pixel (DeltafEIT maps).
RESULTS: The response of regional tidal impedance to PEEP showed a significant difference from 15 to 10 (P = 0.002) and from 10 to 5 (P = 0.001) between patients with and without lung disorders. Tidal impedance increased only in the non-dependent parts in patients without lung disorders after decreasing PEEP from 15 to 10 cm H2O, whereas it decreased at the other PEEP steps in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: During a decremental PEEP trial in ICU patients, EIT measurements performed just above the diaphragm clearly visualize improvement and loss of ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts, at the bedside in the individual patient.
|Ido G Bikker; Steffen Leonhardt; Dinis Reis Miranda; Jan Bakker; Diederik Gommers|
Related Documents :
|332446 - The pao2 response to changes in end expiratory pressure in the newborn respiratory dist...
15719856 - Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilat...
6749776 - Estimation of transmural cardiac pressures during ventilation with peep.
2666596 - Effect of peep on regional ventilation and perfusion in the mechanically ventilated pre...
332446 - The pao2 response to changes in end expiratory pressure in the newborn respiratory dist...
19682996 - Critical oxygen partial pressures and maximal tracheal conductances for drosophila mela...
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2010-05-30|
|Title: Critical care (London, England) Volume: 14 ISSN: 1466-609X ISO Abbreviation: Crit Care Publication Date: 2010|
|Created Date: 2010-07-29 Completed Date: 2011-01-06 Revised Date: -|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9801902 Medline TA: Crit Care Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: R100 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, 3015 GE, The Netherlands. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Intensive Care Units*
Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
Pulmonary Alveoli / physiology*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
|Crit Care. 2010;14(4):192
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Crit Care
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2010 Bikker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 26 Month: 11 Year: 2009
Revision Received Day: 14 Month: 2 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 30 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 30 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Volume: 14 Issue: 3
First Page: R100 Last Page: R100
Publisher Id: cc9036
PubMed Id: 20509966
|Bedside measurement of changes in lung impedance to monitor alveolar ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts by electrical impedance tomography during a positive end-expiratory pressure trial in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients|
|Ido G Bikker1||Email: email@example.com|
|Steffen Leonhardt2||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Dinis Reis Miranda1||Email: email@example.com|
|Jan Bakker1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Diederik Gommers1||Email: email@example.com|
1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, 3015 GE, The Netherlands
2Helmholz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 20, Aachen, D-52074, Germany
Mechanical ventilation is critical for the survival of most patients with respiratory failure admitted to the ICU, but it has become clear that it can exaggerate lung damage and may even be the primary factor in lung injury . Protective ventilatory strategies to minimize this lung injury include reduction of tidal volume and prevention or minimization of lung collapse and overdistension by adequate setting of the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) . Currently, PEEP setting is often guided by global lung parameters such as arterial oxygenation or global compliance, which are not specific for regional lung collapse or overdistension . If a regional monitoring tool for lung collapse and overdistension would be available at the bedside, this would aid optimization of ventilator settings in individual patients.
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive, real-time imaging method that provides a cross-sectional ventilation image of the lung [4-6]. It is based on the measurement of lung tissue impedance by injection of small currents and voltage measurements, using electrodes on the skin surface. Recently, different studies described ventilation distribution change maps to evaluate lung collapse or overdistension [7-9]. Costa et al. described the use of these ventilation distribution change maps in two ICU patients . They introduced an algorithm in which ventilation at a PEEP level is expressed as a percentage from maximal ventilation as seen after a lung recruitment maneuver. In lung-lavaged pigs, Meier et al. composed functional EIT images or ventilation distribution maps by subtracting the EIT images from two PEEP levels to show improvement or loss of regional ventilation between these two PEEP levels . As the clinically set PEEP is often guided by decremental PEEP trials, it would be of interest to evaluate the ventilation distribution change maps during this procedure.
In the present study we evaluate the use of ventilation distribution change maps in ICU patients with two distinct types of lung conditions: with or without lung disorders during a standardized decremental PEEP trial. Furthermore we investigated if the EIT measurements at the bedside may visualize alveolar recruitment and derecruitment in the dependent and non-dependent lung regions.
Following approval by the local institutional human investigations committee, patients were enrolled after providing informed consent from their legal representatives. The study population consisted of 14 mechanically ventilated patients on a mixed ICU. In eight of these patients, end-expiratory lung volume was also measured and these data have recently been published . For all 14 patients, chest x-rays and, if available, CT-scans were retrospectively evaluated and related to clinical history and data to divide these patients into two groups; without lung disorders (Group N) and with lung disorders (Group D). Patients were regarded to be without lung disorders when no clinical signs of respiratory failure, pneumonia or significant atelectasis were present. The group with lung disorders was defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 mmHg and proven pneumonia or abdominal sepsis. All patients were well sedated and ventilated in pressure-controlled mode, without spontaneous breathing activity. All patients were ventilated with constant driving pressures throughout the procedure, mean applied driving pressure was 12 cm H2O (range 9 to 18) in Group N and 16 cm H2O (range 12 to 21) in Group D. Exclusion criteria for participation in the study were: pneumothorax, severe airflow obstruction due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (defined as forced expired volume in 1 s or vital capacity below predicted value minus 2 SD), lung transplantation, thoracic deformations and severe cardiovascular instability.
In all patients, impedance measurements were performed during two minutes with a silicone belt with 16 integrated electrocardiographic electrodes placed around the thoracic cage at the fifth or sixth intercostal space (Figure 1), connected with an EIT device (EIT evaluation kit 2, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). EIT data were generated by application of a small alternating electrical current of 5 mA at 50 kHz. After baseline measurements at the clinical set ventilator settings (Table 1), PEEP was increased to 15 cm H2O. After a steady state of 15 minutes PEEP was decreased stepwise each 10 minutes to 10, then to 5 and, if clinically acceptable, to 0 cm H2O. The stability of each steady state was evaluated by a stable end-expiratory EIT signal and a stable arterial saturation. Before the end of each PEEP level, EIT was measured during two minutes and hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were recorded. Dynamic compliance was calculated by dividing expiratory tidal volume by the constant driving pressure set for each patient. In addition, arterial blood gas analysis was performed (ABL 700, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) in order to calculate the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
EIT data were stored and analyzed offline on a personal computer (Dell, P4, 2.4 GHz, Round Rock, Texas, USA). The EIT scans consist of images of impedance with a 32 × 32 color-coded matrix relative to the lowest impedance during the PEEP trial (rel. ΔZ). The difference between rel. ΔZ at the end of inspiration and expiration is defined as tidal impedance variation (TIV). This tidal impedance variation is visualized in the functional EIT (fEIT) image, which contains tidal impedance variation per pixel (32 × 32 matrix) averaged over one minute (Figure 1). For analysis of the regional distribution of ventilation, the EIT images were subdivided into two symmetrical non-overlapping ventral to dorsal oriented layers defined as dependent and non-dependent regions of interest (ROI). fEIT images before each PEEP step were subtracted from fEIT images at the end of the next PEEP step to obtain ventilation change maps or ΔfEIT images. This ΔfEIT image represents the change in tidal impedance per pixel. With pressure-controlled ventilation with constant driving pressure, the change in tidal impedance per pixel represents the change in tidal volume per pixel or pixel compliance . A weighted pixel count was used to evaluate total increase and decrease in TIV between PEEP steps in the ΔfEIT images and expressed as the percentage positive of total impedance change by equation 1. In this equation a value of 50% represents a balance between gain and loss of TIV at a given PEEP step.
Statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad software package (version 5.0, Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Due to the small number of patients, results are expressed as median and interquartile range. Regional compliance changes between each PEEP step were evaluated with the Wilcoxon matched pair test. EELV, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and dynamic compliance was evaluated using ANOVA for repeated measurements. The percentage positive of the total tidal impedance change during each PEEP step between both groups was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. For all comparisons, P <0.05 was considered significant.
Table 1 presents data on the 14 mechanically ventilated patients. Group N (n = 6) consisted of postoperative patients (two transhiatal esophagectomy, one liver transplantation and one kidney transplantation) without evidence of pulmonary complications (n = 4), and patients requiring ventilatory support after traumatic brain injury (n = 2). Group D (n = 8) consisted of patients with pneumonia (n = 5) and respiratory failure associated with abdominal sepsis (n = 3). Eight patients were measured at a PEEP of 15, 10 and 5 cm H2O and six patients at a PEEP of 15, 10, 5 and 0 cm H2O. Respiratory data during the PEEP steps are presented in Table 2. One patient in the group without lung disorders had a transient drop in blood pressure at PEEP 15 cm H2O and measurements were continued at 10 PEEP cm H2O. All other patients tolerated the PEEP trial well.
Figure 2 exemplarily shows the effect of PEEP on regional ventilation in a patient with lung disorder and in a patient without lung disorder. The ventilation distribution is presented as ventilation distribution maps (fEIT) at each PEEP level and ventilation distribution change maps (ΔfEIT) between PEEP levels. A clear difference can be seen in response to the change in PEEP in the non-dependent and dependent lung regions between these two patients (Figure 2).
In Figure 3, the tidal impedance per cm H2O driving pressure is presented for two ventral to dorsal ROIs at all PEEP levels. In both groups, tidal impedance decreased towards 0 cm H2O PEEP. However, this was different for the individual ROIs. In Group N, tidal impedance increased in the non-dependent ROI after decreasing PEEP from 15 to 10 cmH2O, whereas decreased in the dependent ROI during each PEEP step. In Group D, tidal impedance variation was significantly lower compared to Group N in both regions. Further, tidal impedance did not change in the non-dependent region between PEEP steps 15 to 10 and 5 to 0 and in the dependent region between PEEP step 5 to 0. Tidal impedance decreased significantly during the other PEEP changes.
The ΔfEIT images between PEEP steps for the individual patient are shown in Figure 4. In this figure, also the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and change in dynamic compliance during each PEEP step is presented.
In Figure 5 the total impedance change is shown for each PEEP step. Only during the PEEP step from 15 to 10 the increase was higher than the decrease whereas in all other step the decrease was more than the increase. In all patients, the response of regional tidal impedance to PEEP showed a significant difference from 15 to 10 cm H2O (P = 0.002) and from 10 to 5 cm H2O (P = 0.001) between patients with and without lung disorders (Figure 5).
This trial shows that EIT is suitable for bedside monitoring of tidal impedance or regional compliance during decremental PEEP steps and can differentiate between dependent and non-dependent lung regions. There was a significant difference in response to a stepwise decrease in PEEP between patients with and without lung disorders, indicating a different PEEP dependency between these two groups.
Using EIT, increase or decrease of tidal impedance variation becomes visible in ΔfEIT maps (Figure 4). During a decremental PEEP trial, as used in the present study, improvement in tidal impedance variation can be caused by recruitment of non-ventilated collapsed alveoli or increased ventilation in previously overdistended alveoli. To obtain an equal balance between derecruitment and overdistension, a value of 50% increase of the total tidal impedance change per ΔfEIT map could be used during decremental PEEP steps. If this value is above 50%, more reduction in overdistention compared to increase in derecruitment is present, whereas below 50%, derecruitment is predominant in the measured EIT slice. In the group without lung disorders, total tidal impedance increased after reducing the PEEP from 15 and from 10 cm H2O; this was due to increased tidal impedance variation in the ventral lung regions, with less loss in the dorsal lung regions (Figures 3 and 5). This indicates that during 15 cm H2O of PEEP alveoli in the ventral part were inflated throughout the ventilatory cycle or overdistended and after lowering the PEEP to 10 cm H2O ventilation increased in the non-dependent part. In this group, after further lowering the PEEP from 10 to 5 cm H2O, tidal impedance increase in the ventral part was exceeded by loss of the tidal impedance in the dorsal part; total impedance change was below 50% during this latter PEEP step (Figure 5). In the group with lung disorders, for each PEEP step there was less increase of tidal impedance in the ventral lung regions and more decrease in tidal impedance in the dorsal regions; total positive impedance change was below 50% for each PEEP step (Figure 5). Therefore, in order to prevent alveolar collapse in the dorsal part in this caudal thoracic EIT level, a higher PEEP level should be used in these patients with lung disorders compared to the group without lung disorders (Figures 3 and 5).
EIT is able to show the effect of PEEP on tidal impedance change in each pixel of the functional image matrix. If one accepts the proposed linear relationship between impedance and tidal volume [11-13], the Δimpedance per pixel reflects Δtidal volume in the individual pixel. During pressure-controlled ventilation, the volume change with constant driving pressure or by diving impedance by the driving pressure can be regarded as regional compliance change in each pixel .
In the present study, each patient showed an individual response in tidal impedance change during each stepwise decrease in PEEP, and the response differs between dependent and non-dependent lung regions (Figure 4). This is in accordance with the common understanding of gravity-dependent tidal volume distributions in acute lung injury and acute respiratory disease syndrome [14,15]. While the PEEP setting is often guided by global compliance measurements [16-18] or pressure-volume curve analysis [19,20], these global indicators cannot discriminate between the dependent and non-dependent lung regions. EIT is capable of monitoring regional ventilation distribution at the bedside [21-23]. Setting PEEP by the use of tidal impedance or regional compliance requires a definition of the 'optimal' PEEP with regard to the balance between decreased alveolar surface stress and increased alveolar collapse during stepwise decrease in PEEP. In order to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury , it is proposed that the lung should be opened by a recruitment maneuver and thereafter a relatively adequate PEEP should be used to keep the lung open, with the lowest inspiratory airway pressure to prevent alveolar overdistention . In the present study, we did not use a recruitment maneuver; however, we have shown that a compromise must be found between lowering alveolar overdistention in the non-dependent part and prevention of alveolar collapse in the dependent part. If optimal PEEP is defined as an equal balance between increase and decrease in tidal impedance, at this thoracic EIT level optimal PEEP would be in the studied patients around 10 cm H2O in patients without lung disorders, and at least 15 cm H2O in patients with lung disorders (Figure 5). Because EIT is now able to adequately visualize regional change in ventilation, a definition is needed if this method is used to set the optimal PEEP. In the future, three-dimensional EIT could help to monitor the entire lung.
A potential limitation of the present study is that EIT measures an eclipse with a central diameter of 5 to 10 cm. The individual pixel in the EIT matrix contains a vast number of alveoli; during tidal ventilation and/or stepwise change in PEEP, different alveoli might be included in the EIT pixel. However, because the individual pixel contains alveoli from the same lung region, it is unlikely to influence the results of this study. In the present study, we didn't compare our findings to another imaging technique like CT scanning. However, Meier et al. used the same method in an experimental animal study and showed good agreement between CT and regional ventilation . In addition, for future studies smaller decremental PEEP steps should be chosen in order to establish the optimum PEEP setting for each individual patient.
We conclude that during a decremental PEEP trial in ICU patients, EIT measurements performed just above the diaphragm clearly visualize improvement or loss of ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts, at the bedside in the individual patient. There was a significant difference in response to a stepwise decrease in PEEP between patients with and without lung disorders, indicating a different PEEP dependency between these two groups. However, the individual response to the decrease of PEEP within the groups was also different indicating that optimal PEEP should be titrated individually and can not be generalized for a group of patients. In addition, the response to the decrease of PEEP was different between dependent and non-dependent lung regions within a patient, suggesting that optimal PEEP may be defined as an equal balance between increase and decrease in tidal impedance. This definition of the optimal PEEP in order to minimize VILI needs further research to prove its benefit.
• EIT is suitable for bedside monitoring of tidal impedance or regional compliance during decremental PEEP steps and can differentiate between dependent and non-dependent lung regions.
• During a decremental PEEP trial in ICU patients, EIT measurements performed just above the diaphragm clearly visualize improvement and loss of ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts, at the bedside in the individual patient.
• Differences in response to decremental PEEP steps were found not only between patient groups, but also within groups indicating that the optimal PEEP should be titrated individually and can not be generalized for a group of patients.
• A definition of the optimal EIT PEEP is needed if this technique is going to be used in the clinical setting.
COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CT: computed tomography; EIT: Electrical Impedance Tomography; fEIT: functional EIT; ΔfEIT: functional EIT images subtracted pixelwise from each other; Group D: group with lung disorders; Group N: group without lung disorders; ICU: intensive care unit; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; ROI: region of interest; TIV: tidal impedance variation; ΔZ: mpedance change.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
IB carried out the data acquisition, analysis, statistical analysis and participated in drafting the manuscript. DRM participated in the statistical analysis and in drafting the manuscript. DG participated in the data acquisition and in drafting the manuscript. SL and JB participated in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The EIT equipment was supplied by Dräger Medical AG, Lübeck, Germany. The authors thank Laraine Visser-Isles for English language editing.
|Ricard JD,Dreyfuss D,Saumon G,Ventilator-induced lung injuryCurr Opin Crit CareYear: 20028122010.1097/00075198-200202000-0000312205401|
|ARDSnetVentilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome NetworkN Engl J MedYear: 20003421301130810.1056/NEJM20000504342180110793162|
|Cressoni M,Caironi P,Polli F,Carlesso E,Chiumello D,Cadringher P,Quintel M,Ranieri VM,Bugedo G,Gattinoni L,Anatomical and functional intrapulmonary shunt in acute respiratory distress syndromeCrit Care MedYear: 20083666967510.1097/01.CCM.0000300276.12074.E118091555|
|Frerichs I,Dargaville PA,Dudykevych T,Rimensberger PC,Electrical impedance tomography: a method for monitoring regional lung aeration and tidal volume distribution?Intensive Care MedYear: 2003292312231610.1007/s00134-003-2029-z14566457|
|Hedenstierna G,Using electric impedance tomography to assess regional ventilation at the bedsideAm J Respir Crit Care MedYear: 200416977777810.1164/rccm.240101015044216|
|Putensen C,Wrigge H,Zinserling J,Electrical impedance tomography guided ventilation therapyCurr Opin Crit CareYear: 20071334435010.1097/MCC.0b013e328136c1e217468569|
|Costa EL,Borges JB,Melo A,Suarez-Sipmann F,Toufen C Jr,Bohm SH,Amato MB,Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomographyIntensive Care MedYear: 2009351132113710.1007/s00134-009-1447-y19255741|
|Frerichs I,Hinz J,Herrmann P,Weisser G,Hahn G,Dudykevych T,Quintel M,Hellige G,Detection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CTJ Appl PhysiolYear: 20029366066612133877|
|Meier T,Luepschen H,Karsten J,Leibecke T,Grossherr M,Gehring H,Leonhardt S,Assessment of regional lung recruitment and derecruitment during a PEEP trial based on electrical impedance tomographyIntensive Care MedYear: 20083454355010.1007/s00134-007-0786-917653529|
|Bikker IG,van Bommel J,Reis Miranda D,Bakker J,Gommers D,End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison to reference values and the effect of PEEP in ICU patients with different lung conditionsCrit CareYear: 200812R14510.1186/cc712519021898|
|Adler A,Amyot R,Guardo R,Bates JH,Berthiaume Y,Monitoring changes in lung air and liquid volumes with electrical impedance tomographyJ Appl PhysiolYear: 199783176217679375349|
|Erlandsson K,Odenstedt H,Lundin S,Stenqvist O,Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization using electric impedance tomography in morbidly obese patients during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgeryActa Anaesthesiol ScandYear: 20065083383910.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01079.x16879466|
|Lindgren S,Odenstedt H,Olegard C,Sondergaard S,Lundin S,Stenqvist O,Regional lung derecruitment after endotracheal suction during volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation: a study using electric impedance tomographyIntensive Care MedYear: 20073317218010.1007/s00134-006-0425-x17072587|
|Gattinoni L,Pelosi P,Crotti S,Valenza F,Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional distribution of tidal volume and recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndromeAm J Respir Crit Care MedYear: 1995151180718147767524|
|Luecke T,Meinhardt JP,Herrmann P,Weiss A,Quintel M,Pelosi P,Oleic acid vs saline solution lung lavage-induced acute lung injury: effects on lung morphology, pressure-volume relationships, and response to positive end-expiratory pressureChestYear: 200613039240110.1378/chest.130.2.39216899837|
|Maisch S,Reissmann H,Fuellekrug B,Weismann D,Rutkowski T,Tusman G,Bohm SH,Compliance and dead space fraction indicate an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure after recruitment in anesthetized patientsAnesth AnalgYear: 20081061758110.1213/01.ane.0000287684.74505.4918165575|
|Suarez-Sipmann F,Bohm SH,Tusman G,Pesch T,Thamm O,Reissmann H,Reske A,Magnusson A,Hedenstierna G,Use of dynamic compliance for open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in an experimental studyCrit Care MedYear: 20073521422110.1097/01.CCM.0000251131.40301.E217110872|
|Suter PM,Fairley B,Isenberg MD,Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failureN Engl J MedYear: 1975292284289234174|
|Amato MB,Barbas CS,Medeiros DM,Magaldi RB,Schettino GP,Lorenzi-Filho G,Kairalla RA,Deheinzelin D,Munoz C,Oliveira R,Takagaki TY,Carvalho CR,Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndromeN Engl J MedYear: 199833834735410.1056/NEJM1998020533806029449727|
|Maggiore SM,Richard JC,Brochard L,What has been learnt from P/V curves in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndromeEur Respir J SupplYear: 20034222s26s10.1183/09031936.03.0000420412945997|
|Frerichs I,Schmitz G,Pulletz S,Schadler D,Zick G,Scholz J,Weiler N,Reproducibility of regional lung ventilation distribution determined by electrical impedance tomography during mechanical ventilationPhysiol MeasYear: 200728S261S26710.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S1917664640|
|Frerichs I,Dargaville PA,van Genderingen H,Morel DR,Rimensberger PC,Lung volume recruitment after surfactant administration modifies spatial distribution of ventilationAm J Respir Crit Care MedYear: 200617477277910.1164/rccm.200512-1942OC16840739|
|Victorino JA,Borges JB,Okamoto VN,Matos GF,Tucci MR,Caramez MP,Tanaka H,Sipmann FS,Santos DC,Barbas CS,Carvalho CR,Amato MB,Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomographyAm J Respir Crit Care MedYear: 200416979180010.1164/rccm.200301-133OC14693669|
|Pinhu L,Whitehead T,Evans T,Griffiths M,Ventilator-associated lung injuryLancetYear: 200336133234010.1016/S0140-6736(03)12329-X12559881|
|Lachmann B,Open up the lung and keep the lung openIntensive Care MedYear: 19921831932110.1007/BF016943581469157|
Data on patient characteristics
|Without lung disorders (group N)||With lung disorders
|Number of patients||6||8|
|Age (years)||57 (6)||56 (15)||ns|
|BMI||22.4 (1.8)||24.3 (5.5)||ns|
|Time of mechanical ventilation (hours)||18.0 (12.5)||8.0 (16.3)||ns|
|Baseline PEEP (cm H2O)||5.0 (0.0)||10.0 (1.0)||0.001|
|Baseline EELV (L)||1.65 (0.55)||1.2 (1.2)||ns|
|Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio, (kPa)||59.8 (8.4)||33.5 (6.7)||<0.01|
|Baseline FiO2||35.0 (3.8)||50.0 (10.0)||<0.01|
|Baseline dynamic compliance (ml/cm H2O)||40.1 (12.3)||34.7 (15.6)||ns|
|Reasons for mechanical ventilation||-Postoperative(n = 4)
-Neurological (n = 2)
|-Pneumonia (n = 5)
-Abdominal sepsis (n = 3)
Data are presented as median and (where appropriate) interquartile range. BMI, body mass index; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; EELV, end-expiratory lung volume; ns, nonsignificant.
Respiratory parameters during the decremental PEEP steps
|PEEP [cm H2O]||15||10||5||0||Significance between groups|
|EELV (L)||N||2.3 (0.3)||2.2 (0.2)||1.8 (0.2)*||1.5 (0.2)|
|D||1.9 (1.0)||1.6 (1.0)*||1.3 (0.8)*||1.2 (0.6)||P = NS|
|N||62.3 (1.9)||63.7 (9.4)*||58.3 (13.9)||50.3 (13.8)|
|D||37.9 (10.5)||39.0 (8.6)||33.5(15.2)||26.8 (5.1)||P <0.01|
|N||38.6 (7.4)||45.0 (4.5)||45.0 (4.6)||41.0 (1.2)|
|D||34.1 (11.0)||37.0 (12.6)*||35.0 (13.3)*||29.0 (7.1)||P = NS|
Data are presented as median and (where appropriate) interquartile range. N, without lung disorders, D, with lung disorders. PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; EELV, end-expiratory lung volume; Cdyn, dynamic compliance. Asterisk represents significance within groups vs. 15 cm H2O.
Previous Document: Smoking decreases the level of circulating CD34+ progenitor cells in young healthy women - a pilot s...
Next Document: Effect of obesity on constant workrate exercise in hyperinflated men with COPD.